Guys

guys

>Being a libertarian

lolololol I'll bet that "journalist" knows all kinds of shit about economics and what libertarians don't know about it. lol

>the washington post

whats a librarian?

(((WaPo)))

>The first thing they don't understand is that money isn't just a store of value. It's also a medium of exchange,
Wrong.
Something can be a form of currency AND be a store of value, while something can be a store of value and not a currency (and vice versa)
>Which, if it ever did replace the dollar, would bring the economy to a halt while everyone stopped buying anything other than the essentials and waited to become bitcoin millionaires.
no evidence of this happening in history ever
>To stop that from happening, you'd need to be able to increase the supply of bitcoins as the demand for them did. This is more or less what is known as “printing money,”
the infamous "well lets just print more money!!! the economy will collapse unless we print print print"
>they don't get is that trust makes economies more and not less efficient.
no one trust the governments you retards thats why crypto exists in the first place

and then the article goes on to shill for increasing the block size
there is no fucking escape from the jews, rich, rulers, powerful or whatever else you want to call them
we are going to be slave for eternity

This was retarded he said like one thing out libertarian economic theory and spent the rest of the article talking about the negatives of Bitcoin itself like that wasn’t already known.

Not to mention he said that money can’t be a store of value. I could use gold as a store of value or currency. This article is retarded

typical wapo
take a shot at people who dont want government? check
take a shot at the biggest threat in human history to the central banking system? check

The real slaves are the ones that dance like puppets. I like your summery.