Any of you following the work the Bitcoin Cash dev teams are doing?

Any of you following the work the Bitcoin Cash dev teams are doing?

>researching bottlenecks preventing transaction throughput, with the goal of a visa network-level of transaction capacity
>restoring old opcodes, enabling more programmable functions (think Rootstock, Ethereum-lite)
>Graphene scaling technology
>adaptive blocksize
>fast block propagation

They are for real with this shit. Bitcoin ABC and Bitcoin Unlimited are pumping out some good code in the next year.

On-chain scaling is how this is designed to work. The worries about censorship that have been regurgitated over the last 3 years by trolls are nonsense, and you are seeing the result.

Get on the train to the future.

How will they transfer 8Mb faster than 1Mb?

Complete shit Bitcoin ripoff. Will never be anything but 2nd rate garbage.

That's impossible. The whole point is, why the fuck would you want to only transfer 1MB?

8MB isn't a problem at all with tech from 2005. It isn't a problem now, and it sure as fuck won't be a problem in the future.

"Oh noes a farmer won't be able to run a Rpi node" means jack shit when

>a farmer can, in fact, download blocks just fine over a 3G (outdated) wireless connection
>a farmer can't use Bitcoin anyway
>"node count" doesn't mean shit by itself, anyway. Only miners really count.

I bet you sold at $300 like a good blockstream goy.

You people are consistently 100% wrong about this. It show time and time again. Sit down and stop polluting the discussion with your ignorant shit.

32mb propagation is trivial, then we have graphene. Feasibility of 1tb blocks is confirmed

...

I don't buy trash, and like most do with trash I dump it

>That's impossible.
Exactly. So under all the same circumstances you could complete eight 1Mb Bitcoin blocks in the same time you could one 8Mb BCH block.

So what's the point of increasing the block size if it eventually leads to the same thing?

It's literally just "MUH BLOCKSIZE" marketing at this point.

new levels of retarded here. The block time for both forks is 10min

10min is engineered to ensure a non skewed block reward distribution to all miners unlike a 1mb block size which is based on nothing

Brainwashed flunkies, everyone.

It only took half a year for their sophistry and bullshit to get blown the fuck out now that BCH didn't just not crash and burn, but is now gaining on the rotten corpse of Core.

It's poetic.

>under the same circumstances

NO, not at all.

1. You've have to lower the block time by a massive amount for 8 1MB blocks to "count the same" as 1 8MB block. This introduces a whole new set of problems and arguments.

2. Even then, fees would naturally have to rise. We are seeing this in live action, right now. The proof is already out there. BCH payments are fast as fuck and CHEAP. BTC payments are incredibly expensive (more expensive on average to make a Bitcoin payment then to buy a Rpi node). It's already proven.

What dev team. lmao

You mean the 3 pajeets working on it?

>1GB blocks are not possible without running a datacenter. VISA level scaling is far out of reach.
>old OP codes were taken out for a reason which was it increased the attack surface of bitcoin. Re-enabling them will most likely cause the same thing that happened with eth's multisig.
>Graphene meme is as much of a meme as silicon being replaced with graphene
>Adaptive block size. What? this doesn't make sense. You might as well not even set a block size.
>Fast block propagation.. literally stolen techniques from core devs

Face

>>fucking enter.

Face it cash cucks. Your shit coin is going to die much faster than you think. You only hope is to pay devs to work on your shitcoin project, as well as kicking out your cancer leaders to gain some of real bitcoin investors.
And if what is said will be done. Why not just fork bitcoin to make another shitcoin to refresh the entire series and call it bcash.

All the advantages of Bitcoin Cash are provided by Bitcoin Private plus BTCP will have faster block times, privacy, better miner decentralization, fees that are just as low (if not lower), and a team that doesn't rely on shady marketing tactics. So, why should we use BCH?

>to gain some of real bitcoin investors.

LOL no

Great rebuttal, typical Bcasher

not sure how any of the things you mention make it a good idea to make blocks 1mb. Even the ethereal lightning network would require over 100mb

>What dev team. lmao

Idk, any of the 6 dev teams.

Bitcoin ABC
Bitcoin Unlimited
Bitcoin XT
and more that I can't remember right now

>1GB blocks are not possible without running a datacenter. VISA level scaling is far out of reach.

Already disproven.

>>old OP codes were taken out for a reason which was it increased the attack surface of bitcoin. Re-enabling them will most likely cause the same thing that happened with eth's multisig.

You don't know what you are talking about. That was not a problem with ETH's code, just like the DAO.

It's not ETH's or any other coin's problem if wallet maintainers can't code.

>Graphene meme is as much of a meme as silicon being replaced with graphene

You base this on.........?

>>Adaptive block size. What? this doesn't make sense. You might as well not even set a block size.

This just proves without a doubt that you have zero idea what you are talking about. One of the best and most successful coins out there, Monero, uses an adaptive block size.

Sit the fuck down until you learn something, goddamn.

>Fast block propagation.. literally stolen techniques from core devs

Except it's different tech and it works better than the bullshit core uses.....

>Your shit coin is going to die much faster than you think.

Oh? I thought it was going to die in August

Then September

Then October

Then November

Then December

So you're saying you're going to be right this time around? Why? What credibility do you people have left at all to justify another round of this bullshit?

You don't. You've been exposed and humiliated at every turn.

>what is adaptive blocksize hurr durr

I can't believe I bothered replying to that shit. Fuck.

because segwit is cancer

You do realize that all those dev teams are basically the same central team? And on top of that, all 3 all consist of less than 10 people max. No primary researchers, nor recognised programmers.

p rizun is probably your only good researcher, and even him alone wont be enough to peer review all the shit development ideas coming out from the other pajeets.

>Already disproven.
What you mean disproven? For 1GB to be successful you need long term SSD RAID 10 setup, in order to sync blocks fast enough. New ssds will need to be bought every single week in order to keep up with the blockchain size. Eventually causing an outage on ssds. Also let alone the constant 30Mb/s internet connection for both dl and ul each node will need. That alone rules out households. Maybe 0.001% the population of earth will even give up 30Mb of their bandwidth for free.

>You don't know what you are talking about. That was not a problem with ETH's code, just like the DAO. It's not ETH's or any other coin's problem if wallet maintainers can't code.

??? pajeet. Re-read. The OP codes increases attack surface thus a wallet wipe or even any-one can spend situation will most likely occur. Let alone the fact that node destruction might as well happen before that. Go read the OP-codes that were added in 0.1 client by satoshi. You will realise that satoshi had no clue what he was adding. Not to be demeaning either, 0.1 was still an idea let a lone a final production client.

>Except it's different tech and it works better than the bullshit core uses.....

Are you ver? by any chance. you are just as dumb as him. if you are referring to xthin. jesus you must be delusional then.

Just think to yourself. All these "dev" updates have been in the works longer than segwit. Yet none of them have been added after bcash fork? Is it because the lack of proper peer review or just the fact that all these ideas are bullshit and are pulling the "blocksize is what is pulling us down" string.

>bitcoin's code is owned by Blockstream Core! Whatever they say is law!

2018 will be the Wojaking for Blockstream Corefags.

Dude, you were BTFO in the last thread making these arguments. You're either an actual retard or doing this on purpose.

Your list of benefits was just as shitty. Better miner decentralization? Through what, the asic resistant meme? Good luck getting sufficient hashpower for reasonably quick transactions that way. Further, BCH doesn’t rely on shady market tactics, but whatever.

BTCP dev team is shallow, they are doing this as a marketing gimmick for their dead ZCL. Brilliant marketing move, but don’t mistake this as legit tech. It’s not even BTC, it’s a ZCL fork that’s getting airdropped to BTC holders.

BCH is going to reign supreme in 2018, and BTCP is vastly inferior to XMR, as all ZeroCoin or whatever forks are.

>Adaptive block size. What? this doesn't make sense

lol people attack BCH because they are financially invested in BTC. They know b-legacy is already dead and their only hope is name calling the true bitcoin. Anyone (not paid off by mastercard) that was into bitcoin pre-2013 knows that BCH is the real deal. BCH back to 90% market dominance in a year.

Don't listen to bcash retards. When it comes to logic, they might as well be black.