Boomers

So, how exactly did boomers fuck up the economy, and how bad did they do it?
Genuinely curious.

The biggest fuck up was the housing market.

Houses in the US were meant to be cheap and affordable-- something that was meant to be your own.

Now it has become an investment tool, that the greedy mother fuckers severley took advantage of, right to the point of fucking over their offspring. Here's how it workes:

>Deregulate housing loans, so anyone can get it
>create an expensive supply of housing
>bubble pops, and banks are pretty much close to going under with loans that can't get paid back
>US government bails them out, WHILE THEY COLLECT THE NOTES ON ALL THE FORECLOSED HOMES
>current situation: housing supply is low causing housing prices to skyrocket over 200% in the last two years

They didn't. They had an easier time succeeding in life because far more conservative policies were in place and the entire country wasn't infested with tens of millions of Mexicans willing to work labor jobs for a dollar an hour. Grandpa worked at a factory as a high school dropout and paid for two kids to go to college, a car, a house, and a stay-at-home wife.

Then liberals and jews decided women needed to be in the workforce. (Aw, sorry goyim... the number of people competing for the same number of jobs just doubled! Maybe both of you should get jobs so you can pay your mortgage... to our banks.) Then unchecked immigration flooded the labor force with millions more fighting for the same scraps.

The constant race to the bottom (something we've written about since the 20s... "Grapes of Wrath." Good read. That's why goyimlings aren't required to read it in their Public Edjewcation any more) has left a permanent underclass, of which the modern liberals are a part of. Their own policies, which they keep voting for more of, destroyed their own chances to actually work hard and succeed in life, to be happy and start a family (Processor Shekelberg in our Feminist Studies class says women should fuck at least 200 people before they get out of college and not consider settling down until they are in their late 30s!) to succeed... all stolen from them by their own hands. And of course no liberal has ever, once, ever been able to even consider that they are at fault for any of their own woes, or that they may have made a mistake... so we have entire generations so convinced that "those old people..." are at fault for every mistake they made.

Also we need to vote for Hillary and let another hundred million mexicans and arabs into the US. Because more people means more jobs for everyone! Isn't that right, goyim?

>>Deregulate housing loans, so anyone can get it
Liberal policies to force banks to give money to niggers and spics to "help the disadvantaged."

Liberals blaming others for their own fuckups, again. It's all you can really do.

...

Who is goyim

Lurk more you cancerous newfag

lost.

>>Deregulate housing loans, so anyone can get it

was actually the opposite, regulated required quotas to "underprivileged" minorities during the Clinton era. basically mortgages that never had a chance of being paid back but banks were forced to loan out due to govt mandate. subprime loan crisis, the rest is history.

but please don't blame deregulation when it was in fact over regulation that caused it.

>don't blame deregulation when it was in fact over regulation
Meaningless words: In certain kinds of writing, particularly in art criticism and literary criticism, it is normal to come across long passages which are almost completely lacking in meaning. Words like romantic, plastic, values, human, dead, sentimental, natural, vitality, as used in art criticism, are strictly meaningless, in the sense that they not only do not point to any discoverable object, but are hardly even expected to do so by the reader. When one critic writes, “The outstanding feature of Mr. X’s work is its living quality,” while another writes, “The immediately striking thing about Mr. X’s work is its peculiar deadness,” the reader accepts this as a simple difference of opinion. If words like black and white were involved, instead of the jargon words dead and living, he would see at once that language was being used in an improper way. Many political words are similarly abused. The word fascism has now no meaning except in so far as it signifies “something not desirable.” The words democracy, socialism, freedom, patriotic, realistic, justice, have each of them several different meanings which cannot be reconciled with one another. In the case of a word like democracy, not only is there no agreed definition, but the attempt to make one is resisted from all sides. It is almost universally felt that when we call a country democratic we are praising it: Consequently the defenders of every kind of regime claim that it is a democracy, and fear that they might have to stop using the word if it were tied down to any one meaning. Words of this kind are often used in a consciously dishonest way. That is, the person who uses them has his own private definition, but allows his hearer to think he means something quite different. Statements like Marshal Pétain was a true patriot. The Soviet Press is the freest in the world. The Catholic Church is opposed to persecution,