>im demonstrating
By asking me to formulate your argument for you? Are you joking? Segwit removes signatures from transactions that way the transaction can be completed by non-owners of the BTC used in that transaction. This type of Lightning is only necessary if you don't have any block space and your fees are already high.
BCH PUMP INCOMING
Dylan Harris
William Scott
by forcing you to demonstrate that you dont know what segwit does and you dont know how LN functions
thank you
Luke Roberts
All the hardcore BTC people have been with BCH since the fork
Easton Ross
seeAll Segwit does is remove digital signatures from the transaction and moves them to an "anyone can spend" address. This is the functionality of Segwit for LN that allows you to bridge channels (still doesn't work). Considering a blockchain is a decentralized ledger of sequencing digital signatures and Segwit removes signatures from transactions, its questionable if BTC even fits this definition.
Samuel Murphy
You still haven't made an argument yet.
Jason Brooks
Looks like he’s not going to
It’s official: BTC headed to 0 and BCH headed to 15k
James Cooper
i was waiting to see if this shitthread would get bumped again desu
anyways, ln requires the ability to refer to unsigned tx
i suggest you turds actually learn the tech instead of repeating catchphrases and lies
also i made six figures tonight on VEN and ARY
have fun with your shitcoin
Jace Lopez
This is not a discussion about what an end-user *can* do. It is about the top level of integration that the winning network will be capable of. Big blocks mean a chain had effectively removed itself as a contender for the title of most dominant network. If you are not already thinking on end game IoT integration, then you are a fucking normie in this game.
Adrian Carter
Lol, no you didnt
Joshua Phillips
investopedia.com
What the fuck are you talking about?