Is this guy right about being a billionaire?

Is this guy right about being a billionaire?

Yes.

No because the only way to change the world is to create wealth by starting a business, not by giving away money.
Giving away money literally wastes resources and makes people worse off.

The more you know.

Yeah, fuck all these parents with children that have rare diseases and require expensive treatment to cure, they shouldn't have accumulated at least half a million before having children, the irresponsible bastards!!
tldr you're an idiot that read one too many Ayn Rand quotes

Tough life, who cares if some kid dies? He probably wouldn't contribute to society anyway, so the world is better off without him.

So building schools, hospitals, and libraries would be a waste of resources and waste of money?

All my ideas of improving the world would fetch me a trial in Den Haag, so I wouldn't feel too bad about just enjoying my wealth as a billionaire.

Why should private person build that? Rich people pay super high taxes anyway that go into building such things.

>the exception is the rule

>Yeah, fuck all these parents with children that have rare diseases and require expensive treatment to cure
Why not start a business to mass produce these treatments so they aren't expensive anymore?
OH WAIT, THE GOVERNMENT MAKES IT ILLEGAL
Fuck you kid.
You'd help a lot more sick kids by dramatically decreasing the cost of medical care.

>Ayn Rand quotes
I am a libertarian like most people on this board, but fuck that dumb bitch.

holyshit are you memeing or are you this retarded? Only businesses can impact the world what the fuck am I reading

And why shouldn't I help, if I were a billionaire?

>So building schools, hospitals, and libraries

Libraries are already LITERALLY a waste of fucking money since we have the internet.
Schools should be completely privatized.
and hospitals should be privatized/free marketized as well.

Notice everything you're talking about, the government monopolizes in America.

When did I post this? This is me, right?

I live in a pretty small and not very rich country. No matter what business I start, going to France and staying there for a year in order to receive treatment will never become financially viable for a middle class family.

Business impact the world in a much more powerful and long lasting way.

Why would you spent millions to cure a few sick kids for a year when you could spend millions mass producing medical technology and get the price down so poor people can afford it forever.
Much greater impact.

>I live in a pretty small and not very rich country.
That's the fault of your shitty government then.

>No matter what business I start, going to France and staying there for a year in order to receive treatment will never become financially viable for a middle class family.
That sucks. Maybe both your government and France's government should stop destroying the economy and monopolizing medical care.

Sure, that's good too, but these are not mutually exclusive activities.

schools and hospitals should be privatized
lol
do you want us to go back to colonial america? are you dreaming of a time when only the aristocracy could send their children to school?

Medical care is not monopolized here or in France, what the fuck are you talking about?
I still don't see why I shouldn't help people if I could. The "le give fishing rod not fish" meme does not apply here.

>imagine thinking this small

give a man a fish he has 1 meal. teach a man to fish and he never goes hungry again

Altruism is cancer.
Read some Ayn Rand. Also this

Is building schools in deprived communities and shit like that not teaching a man to fish?

They somewhat are because if you spend it on the sick kids, money and resources that could have done to investing in medical technology are destroyed.

>schools and hospitals should be privatized
>lol
They absolutely fucking SHOULD BE and this isn't an argument.
>do you want us to go back to colonial america?
no lol
what the fuck is your point
you don't make sense
>are you dreaming of a time when only the aristocracy could send their children to school?
Holy fuck you are unbelievably brainwashed and stupid.
Do you know how much it costs to educate someone today?
The internet has made this basically fucking free. Back then access to knowledge was expensive, now it's at the touch of your fingers.
If it were privatized, the price would fall through the floor and it would look radically different from the system we have today.
Fuck public poison """""education"""".

Don't teach him shit. He's a grown ass man. Fishing isn't that hard.
Or
Kill the man and he will never go hungry again.

Completely wrong about it. I use my money to req havoc on bullies from my past.

Yes.
Human life is worth less and less and you're investing in it.
It's literally losing money.

yes, if you were going to have a child you should've prepared for it to be unhealthy just in case.
are people really this stupid?

>Medical care is not monopolized here or in France, what the fuck are you talking about?
Yes it is you gigantic idiot.
You're a liar.
France has socialized healthcare like the rest of the world.
If you want to be a doctor you have to go through the government monopoly.

>I still don't see why I shouldn't help people if I could. The "le give fishing rod not fish" meme does not apply here.
It absolutely does apply because mass producing medical care and getting the price down does much more to help people than simply giving them free healthcare.

>Being this much of brainlet and fall for Ayn Rand meme

You're the one thinking small.
My entire post was about thinking big.
Imagine projecting this hard.

Ayn Rand was a dumb bitch, but free markets are a good thing absolutely.

How would you feel that you helped some random sick kid and ignored other 100000 sick kids that will die. How would you choose which kid to help? This is just virtue signaling, such acts of "altruism" are hypocrisy.

>i.e africa

>having no argument

this is why Altruism does not make sense

Reminder that healthcare used to be cheap in the 50s/60s/70s in USA before the government intervened and started controlling everything.
The price should be coming DOWN, not up.

Socialized =/= monopolized, you mong.
Private clinics do exist.
I'd help kids of my nationality. Simple as. I can't help all these African kids, so I wouldn't bother.

This

Most of the civilized world has tried this for over a hundred years (literary giving money to Africa) and things never get better. 1. More money = 2. Africans live longer = 3. more children = 4. more problems = 5.more money needed = 6. repeat 1.

Start companies and create work for them. Free money = laziness and failure

>Socialized =/= monopolized
Socialized medicine is LITERALLY the government monopolizing medical services one way or another.
You literally can not refute this.
I mean it's incredible how stupid you are.

Do you know what the NHS is?

>Private clinics do exist.
Barely, they're also extremely regulated and controlled by the government.
Also these private clinics are expensive thanks to state involvement/lack of economies of scale due to government system taking most of the market share

Partly, giving away your money to charity is retarded, but using your influence to start a business that will change the world is the right thing to do.

Kek. Good one. The only people hurt when people get free things are business owners. The 99% are helped. Read about it.

>thinking big
>best comparison this brainlet can think of for profit driven progress is charity work vs medical research
>projecting this much

>Yeah, fuck all these parents with children that have rare diseases and require expensive treatment to cure, they shouldn't have accumulated at least half a million before having children, the irresponsible bastards!!
A very rare occurrence. Only a retard would create a worldview on something that happens so little. The irony is that rare diseases are often not curable anyway and throwing half a million at it only prolongs suffering. It's literally pointless.

thats the governments job. the individual helps other individuals through trickle down economics not hand outs. hand outs put people on the drip feed. business puts them to work and gives them the skills and money they need to build their own business

You are so right. The only solution is black genocide. Or starvation of black families. Why didn't I think of this.

Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

plenty of things you can donate to that will actually help the planet so you and everyone you know benefits as well as the general public / poor
>nuclear fusion
>lab grown meat
>medical research

You are so right. The only solution is black genocide. Or starvation of black families. Why didn't I think of this.

africas population is artificially propped up. they cant physically sustain that number of people wothout hand outs. if we let nature take its course they would revert back to a much more sustainable population size

not saying thats the right thing to do but it exemplifies the problems with handouts

africas population is artificially propped up. they cant physically sustain that number of people wothout hand outs. if we let nature take its course they would revert back to a much more sustainable population size

not saying thats the right thing to do but it exemplifies the problems with handouts

even if a billionaire just blows his money on yachts it's a good thing
>people build the yachts
>people maintain the yachts
>people supply the parts and resources

even if he just leaves it in a bank or cold storage its good
>in bank, collect interest and bank can loan out money to others
>in cold storage, drives up price as coins become more scarce, making everyone more wealthy

Meanwhile, stealing and distributing a billionaires money accomplishes nothing except satisfying some urges of some poorfag.
I recently talked to a leftist who was all about redistributing wealth and universal basic income.
If every person on earth gets $2k a month we would need $192,000,000,000,000 every year. Total cash in circulation is what, 50 trillion? Stock market is like 70 trillion.

Not curable yet is not the same thing as impossible to cure no matter what.

If I was a multi billionaire i would be an anti-soros

Is this /pol now.
Everyday we stray futher from biz.

Guess what. New technologies and businesses drive up the global population size as well. Why do you think we have 7 billion people and growing.

my end game with crypto is to be rich enough to set up some sort of business that allows NEETs to work from home

who cares, youll never be a millionaire with crypto so why even think about it

he's wrong

Waste of resources

Know what happens when people with rare diseases reproduce?

He is right.
I am soon to become a millionaire and then a billionaire.
When i become a billionaire i must dedicate my life into helping humanity.
People should be ashamed to die before achieving some victory to mankind.

>The only people hurt when people get free things are business owners
No, society is worse off because the scarce resources in society are temporarily consumed/wasted as economic production goes down. Prices are forced to rise because scarce resources have been consumed without anything to replace it.
What's needs to happen instead is increase economic production.

If you are stupid enough to be a socialist you need a free helicopter ride.

>Read about it.
>DUDE READ MARX LMAO

>>best comparison this brainlet can think of for profit driven progress is charity work vs medical research
There are countless other comparisons you brainlet.
How about giving away food instead of growing food on a farm or increasing farming technology.
Africa should learn that lesson.
You couldn't even refute my ONLY comparison. lol

>Is this guy right about being a billionaire?
yes

Nope. Yacht logic is retarded because that logic works better with distributing to poor fags. Poorfags would instantly re-inject that money into businesses and economy which creates jobs and businesses.

instant injections don't create businesses, slow constant injections does.

not in africa though. africas whole population lives or dies on the drip feed of western altruism. places like india and china may not be nice places but they can support their populations. africa can not and by pumping in endless hand outs were only making them more reliant because it kills business, whos gonna buy bread when the res cross hands it out for free?. if we pumped in jobs maybe they would have a chance. but then you gotta question how viable african workers are. china is trying well see how that goes

We are altright man. We can have socialism if we were a white country.

You mean renewable resources. Nothing that poor people need to survive is not renewable. When business owners receive invest ment money they spend that money on resources as well to sell to the poor families. No different.

Stop falling for Jewish bullshit

Wtf is with all the normies on my board? I unironically would not give away a dime if I was a billionaire and anyone who would is a literal cuck. When you get this romantic image of the poor family starving for a loaf of bread, realise that it is their circumstances which endears them to you, and if you take that away they are just as vile, shitty, and selfish as 99% of people. If you read enough literature you start to realise people are terrifying, poor people especially so, study non fiction and this will be reinforced. Most victims would happily play the role of victimiser, put a gun in the hand of a poor fisherman and see how long it takes for him to start looting.

Basically just donate some to an animal shelter and use the rest to preserve things that matter, like culture, buy Art, it will outlive any human currently alive. Human life is by and large, worthless.

>1000 poorfags buys 1000 cars
>Car factories hire more people
>More replacement parts
>Carshops have more business
>Insurance companies prosper
>etc etc
>1 or 2 rich fag buys crazy boat
>Doesn't create shit

>Donate trillions of dollars in food aid to Africa
>They're still poor, starving, and die of AIDS

it's pretty funny, the quickest way to get people to stop caring for the poor is having them work at a soup kitchen

So instead of the owner of the money directly spending it himself into businesses and economy which creates jobs and businesses, it works better to first pay a bunch of useless bureaucrats to distribute it to people who can't make their own money?

We are talking about helping people, not subhumans.

You're both wrong.
When rich people SAVE money it lowers the cost of capital and consumer goods so people can consume more and businesses have cheaper input costs.

They can either do this or invest that money in a business.

Either way society wins.

What makes people poor is reckless, wasteful spending and money printing.
Keynesians are fucking wrong.

Socialism doesn't even fucking work with white people.
>we can have poverty and economic stagnation if everyone was white

What is your argument?
You aren't making sense, retard.

>Car factories hire more people
>More replacement parts
>Carshops have more business
>Insurance companies prosper
>suddenly no one buys cars
>massive layoffs
>people have to sell their cars as they no longer have a salary
>car market gets flooded by practically new cars for half the price as the factory
>the factory actually have to lay off more people then they had before since the whole market is now second hand

>billionaire decides to buy $100m yacht
>shipyard building yacht employs 1000 people
>supplying industries get more business
>insurance for yacht costs a fuckton
>yacht sails to poor but nice country bringing spending power there
>businessmen can meet on yacht and make nice deals
>prostitutes can have a good time

>poorfags just drive their cars to mcdonalds

You need to go deeper. American businesses that are overstocked are the ones giving those handouts to Africa. The handouts they get are for cheap food and clothes. Sure irs harder on the few business owners producing the cheapo food and clothes but that's just natural selection. As a business creator you need to be fulfilling a need to society to stay in business. If basic soicietal needs are met then naturally new businesses will migrate towards selling goods and services that the society actually does need. If poor people get food and clothes then business owners naturally start producing non necessities for profit. While poor people don't starve. Its a win win in that sense.

Could be, I'm neither.

They should've aborted. Modern medicine can detect most of this shit in the womb now.

My argument is that your argument is flawed because the resources consumed are renewable.

You know that argument can be applied same for rich person buying a yacht?
top kek
made me laugh

In private society people will also run schools, hospital and libraries. Cause people want it and pay for it. And before you answer: You pay with taxes now. So you are already paying. But people in government decide what you will get.

>resources consumed are renewable.
no shit they are fucking renewable but it requires capital/time/effort/labour to produce them

your argument is pointless

He's right but he phrased it like a sperg. Consider someone like Bill Gates, he could either invest his resources in creating new technology that will impact everyone's life and serve as the foundation for innovation for the next 1000 years, or he could give everyone in Africa $100. This is an extreme example to illustrate the point.

no
>Poorfags would instantly re-inject that money
Rich people wouldn't

>Rich people wouldn't
Do you think rich people just hoard all of their money in some giant hidden vault and never spend anything?

so true. free market, fair trade, fair wealth.

unfortunately some people think its better to take the resources, instead of free market trade. you see the consequences with mass migration and a lot of more shit.

This. We keep giving niggers money, but they just stay niggers.

Nah, honestly they would dump a good chunk into off-shore accounts in tax-haven.

No. Rich people invest money in stocks. Bonds etc. That doesn't provide society anything.

that'showyoubecomeabillonaire.jpg

basically this

So then people who live in those countries will see massive improvements in their living standards.
We should just have low as fuck taxes here so rich people keep their money in this country.

bonds dont but that's governments fault for creating them

stock DO however, you invest in a company that is creating wealth for society.

How do you not know this? is this your first day on Veeky Forums?

Euthanasia should be legal for kids like that and ofc chemical castration and sterilisation for the parents, making sure they wont be able to create another abomination.

Its what's best for the child

rich person here. own no stocks, no bonds.

I'll put my money into this company that will use it to make stuff.
>that doesn't provide society anything
Oh, in that case, I'll give it to someone else who will just buy things for themselves instead.

99% of tge 1% The richest people on earth inherited their money. The richest people have so much money they couldn't even spend it if they wanted to. It's too much.

>OH WAIT, THE GOVERNMENT MAKES IT ILLEGAL
how is that? actually curious and not trolling. can u elobarete on that point?

That is my worry