Last warning to get out of BCC

I'm all in on BCH for the moon that begins in the hours when Weiss rates it higher than BTC

>believing a con man who who literally reused one of satoshi's old public signatures

Good and fine and all, I'm more excited about the internet-less, app free way of sending transactions over texts. It might not cause hype right away, but it will have a huge effect on exponential adoption, especially in shithole countries.

Classic low effort FUD
I love you biz

Don't say you weren't warned.

OP you don't make any sense... Although I do agree, hodling BCH is perhaps the riskiest top 10 crypto you can hodl. Most likely to lose and shrink out for SEVERAL reasons.

Unfortunately BCH hodlers like to echo chamber themselves with comfy BTC fud and aren't making themselves aware of how much of a slanted gamble they're making.

What gamble? That pushing the global transaction volume through a 1mb second pipe is a fucking retarded idea? That lightning network after many years still has not solved the fundamental problem that guarantees it's centralised? That corecucks chose the wrong side of a brain burningly obvious fork and are now desperately trying to perform posthoc damage control as the market dominance bleeds out all over the place and king fucking neckbeard resigns in abject disgrace?
If anyone on the planet was least qualified to be talking about delusion it would be people trying to make the inverse case

How is this news coming this week? Their private beta isn't even starting this week I believe

Anyone knows who is behind CounterMarkets? Calvin Ayre?

Satoshi said big news coming this January but we're still waiting...

Such as constant bleeding. Or 45 dollar transaction fees? Or 24 hour wait periods? Or perhaps being taken over by the banks.

Man with all these great things going for BTC, you would think it would be 50k by now.

>he thinks craig wright is satoshi
You know he forged the signature right, you fucking idiot?

Delusional cashie.

Begone, Blockstream™ hired shill, how much do they pay you per post, 0.00000001 btc?

this coin has nothing to offer. They struggle with adoption. Roger posting stupid posters on twitter disproving himself in every stupid tweet like trump. This is new era of conspiracy coin 2018. News like fork blocksize to 32MB while they cant utilize even 1MB are not helping either.

You people really have no clue

>BCH is perhaps the riskiest top 10 crypto you can hodl

not if you got them for free lol
what news are we talking about here?

You can check it yourself if you know python, fucking idiot.

FWIW Im 80% Bitcoin but I think its fucking garbage and has no future at this point.
Not really sold on BCH enough to make the move yet just yet though.

The proof it was forged is flawed. He deliberately didn't prove without a doubt that he is Satoshi for reasons that go above your head

Bch is not competing with btc only, it's competing with all other cryptos. How is bch supposed to get more use than eth while being technically inferior in literally every aspect?

Your post is a good example of what meant by an echochamber

You do realize what's on the roadmap right. Smart contracts and tokenization so it matches with Ethereum. Zk-snarks through extension blocks so it has the best privacy of any coin without any of the risk of hyper-inflation like ZCash. These will all be coming in 2018. Even if that was the end of the upgrades to this coin it would still be the best on the market.

explain for a brainlet like me please?
I wanna learn more but there is so much fud in the whole BTC/BCH drama. please gib some good podcast or whatever where they explain this to a retard like me.

You know he posted a quote from Jean Paul Sarte with that hash, the man who declined a nobel prize in literature. The whole point of the hash he posted publicly was to say he wasn't going to prove he was Satoshi. (A smart move considering the UK was going to try and imprison Satoshi for ties to terrorism). Also the two people that Craig showed real hashes for believed him meaning he must have shown them something legit. Gavin Andresen even built a computer in order to make sure when Craig verified who he was there couldn't have been any funny business.

>Bch is not competing with btc only, it's competing with all other cryptos. How is bch supposed to get more use than eth while being technically inferior in literally every aspect?
Bitcoin Cash will have smart contracts, a larger blockchain (meaning you can do more smart contracts on it), and lower fees. It's true that Ethereum is the only coin that competes with BCH, but BCH is far more secure and you can do more on it.

>They struggle with adoption
BCH has been averaging triple the daily transactions Ethereum had at its age. How is that struggling with adoption?

There is value in the oldest and longest chain with the thickest armour in itself, as long as it's not a completely and utterly useless chain subject to sabotage. That is what BCH is, in light of what has happened to BTC. It's not at all accurate to say that ETH is flatly superior to BCH. They are different things with different advantages and disadvantages, and thus they can coexist quite happily. BCH is very simply what BTC should be, and BTC is dead and useless, a shambling disgrace which is weighing down the entire ecosystem. That is really all there is to it. None of that says all the other cryptocurrencies are worthless, just that BTC is and BCH is not.

And if it remains POW, it will still be worthwhile to people who have not yet made it.

Im getting a little sick of all these POS coins coming out.

Because it's devs actually want to be #1most used coin in the world not unlike most coins that just want to reach $0.10

If bch has equivalent functionality to ethereum it means it has the exact same scaling problems while being unable to switch to pos and having way less and way less talented developers.

>a larger blockchain

Eth has a dynamic gas limit, scalability problems are due to the execution speed of smart contracts, not block size...

>It's true that Ethereum is the only coin that competes with BCH

Eos, cardano, qtum?

>but BCH is far more secure
It has way less hashpower if that's what you meant.

>and you can do more on it.

Are you serious?

...

>If bch has equivalent functionality to ethereum it means it has the exact same scaling problems
Ethereum has a complicated programming language, BCH will do it in a far simpler and elegant way

>while being unable to switch to pos
Misses the role of miners in securing the chain

>having way less and way less talented developers.
Have a look at nChain and their patents, that they will apply exclusively to BCH

BCH might have scaling problems in a few years.
For now they can simply buy more harddrives fucking LMAO.

Do you think bitmain or calvin ayre or any other large miner gives a signle fuck whether they need to store a couple hundred more gigabytes?

How deluded are core shills?

The innovation coming to BCH in 2018 will be unprecedented. And you faggots will still be waiting for LN in 2019.

WHO DO YOU THINK WILL IMPLEMENT LN BRAINLET? BITPAY? COINBASE?

AHAHAHAHAH ALL, LITERALLY ALL BIG BTC COMPANIES HATE BCORE YOU DUMB FAGGOTS: CORE BURNED ALL THEIR BRIDGES

THEY WILL NEVER TRUST BCORE AGAIN

LOL nothing like this is on roadmap. bitcoinunlimited.info/cash-development-plan

reactivation OPcodes clears the way for everything he said.
Didnt you know Bitcoin could have had all that years ago if it hadn't been cucked by Bcore?

>Ethereum has a complicated programming language, BCH will do it in a far simpler and elegant way

Ethereum has EVM and other languages are compiled to it. Also now you're not arguing based on facts but dreams. Is there even a draft of that bch's language?

>Misses the role of miners in securing the chain

The goal is to secure the chain. If pos works it performs the same function while being orders of magnitude cheaper and more scalable.

>Have a look at nChain and their patents, that they will apply exclusively to BCH

Are you suggesting wright is going to patent troll ethereum?

lol BCH has dozen of teams developing for it. You have forgotten the power of open source after living with Core/Vitalik for so long

Ok, you fail to understand these coins tackle smart contracts in far different ways, but Gas is the pricing of running smart contracts in Eth. With BCH there will negligible fees as the blocksize allows for far more space for smart contracts. You can't say that block size doesn't limit smart contracts in Eth when Gas is literally the pricing paid for a miner to include your smart contract (that's another way of saying if you don't pay a high enough fee it won't be put on the blockchain). With BCH the size of the blockchain makes this a non-issue. When I say you can do more on BCH its because they plan on 1GB blocks. Vitalik is completely opposed to this and he will do anything to ensure average computers are still full nodes. If your average computer is a full node then the gas limits imposed will make you unable to any large scale smart contracts. At 1GB blocks you can do an immense amount of smart contracts. You people fail to realize it is the blockchain that makes a crypto-currency and with a blockchain that is going to be exponentially larger than all other cryptos then BCH will be exponentially more capable than all cryptos. Please explain to me how Ethereum can compete with the amount of smart contracts BCH can offer if BCH has block sizes orders of magnitude bigger than Eth? This isn't that hard.

There are six teams working on BCH each with an independent roadmap you fucking retard. You chose one and thought it was all. Congrats, you ate too much lead paint as a kid.

yours.org/content/adding-zero-knowledge-to-bitcoin-cash-95a2a022a387/
Here's what you were looking for.

No thank you i don't listen to conspiracy theories, i verify. Maybe you should onbaord Alex Jones to help you spread your core propaganda.

POS takes value away from a coin. Crypto was meant to be a thing that people could them selves mine. Proof of Stake makes any coin more centralized by nature.

If you are poor living in a poor place you have no hope of mining Stellar. But if you happen to get your hands on some electricity you can mine Bitcoin.

If you are living under communism and your currency just inflated 1,000,000% in a month, you have no hope of securing your wealth in 2018 Ethereum but if your fellow capitalist pig friends can get some PCs together, you can mine bitcoin.

I love how rich liberals living in 1st world countries are the only people bitching about the costs to mine crypto. Those bleeding heart champions of the poor and impoverished.

>The goal is to secure the chain. If pos works it performs the same function while being orders of magnitude cheaper and more scalable.
Think about this logically. If I want to perform a 51% on a POW coin I have to invest billions in mining gear. I will lose all those billions in mining gear due to the attack. The only coins I can double spend during the attack are my own coins so I need to spend more billions on coins. Now for POS all you need to own is coins. So with POS there is a much lower barrier to entry for a 51% attack. It's not that hard. Don't get me wrong POS is alright, but its just not as good.

who told you this bullshit ? its not true. If so it will be published.

>Is there even a draft of that bch's language?
nchain.com/en/blog/nchain-innovation-computational-flexibility-using-the-blockchain/
nchain.com/en/blog/bitcoin-cash-development-testing-accord/

>The goal is to secure the chain. If pos works it performs the same function while being orders of magnitude cheaper and more scalable.
nchain.com/app/uploads/2017/07/Proof-of-Work-and-the-Firm.pdf

>Are you suggesting wright is going to patent troll ethereum?
Vitalik would have built smart contracts on Bitcoin had Core not prevented him to do so

>For now they can simply buy more harddrives fucking LMAO.
>but Gas is the pricing of running smart contracts in Eth. With BCH there will negligible fees as the blocksize allows for far more space for smart contracts

Eth scalability problems are due to propagation and verification time, not block size limit.

>Vitalik is completely opposed to this and he will do anything to ensure average computers are still full nodes.
>Please explain to me how Ethereum can compete with the amount of smart contracts BCH can offer if BCH has block sizes orders of magnitude bigger than Eth? This isn't that hard.

Gas limits are set dynamically by the miners (stakers in the future). There's no hard coded limit.

>If you are poor living in a poor place you have no hope of mining Stellar. But if you happen to get your hands on some electricity you can mine Bitcoin.

Are you fucking serious? A poor person is going to buy a bunch of antminers and mine profitably?

>Now for POS all you need to own is coins. So with POS there is a much lower barrier to entry for a 51% attack.

Non sequitur, it depends on how much these coins are worth compared to how much a mining equipment is worth.
The problem with mining is that the cost of an attack is a function of burned energy which can't go up indefinitely and depresses prices. With proof of stake there's no theoretical limit.

MUH FULL NODES

This is the "proof" signature that Wright provided proving he's Satoshi:

MEUCIQDBKn1Uly8m0UyzETObUSL4wYdBfd4ejvtoQfVcNCIK4AIgZmMsXNQWHvo6KDd2Tu6euEl13VTC3ihl6XUlhcU+fM4=

Pic related you can see the command to decode it from base64 and encode it as hex.

Now look at
blockchain.info/tx/828ef3b079f9c23829c56fe86e85b4a69d9e06e5b54ea597eef5fb3ffef509fe?

and

blockchain.info/tx/828ef3b079f9c23829c56fe86e85b4a69d9e06e5b54ea597eef5fb3ffef509fe?format=hex

If you put the content on the second page into blockchain.info/decode-tx you can see it's just the public signature on Satoshi's transaction.

Literally all he did is take a publicly available signature from Satoshi and encode it in base 64. Craig Wright is a fraud and anyone who believes in BCH is being taken for a ride.

They already do that in shithole countries you fucking ignorant liberal. Pull your head out of Stalin's ass sometime and expand your mind. They are counties with actual use cases of crypto, because you need a truck load of your own counties currency to buy the gas it took to get to the gas station. But bleeding heart liberals will donate solar panels and shitskins will sometimes figure out how to make them work.

>corecucks truly are this dense
He was exposed as satoshi, or part of the satoshi teamn via his email getting hacked.
Only after that he produced fake evidence in order to get the press and coiners off his back and it worked.
Do you realize the ramifications he would face if he actually proved it?

Being known as fraud by a bunch of brainlets that cant put 1+1 together is far comfier than being known as Satoshi Nakamoto.

If you think Bitmain and Ver and Ayres and Gavin would work with him if they thought he was a fraud is maximum retard. He prroved it in private to all of them newfriend.

Kek Corecucks absolutely shitting themselves, they just cannot stop talking about Cash Chad

I haven't even claimed my coins, not about to now

>guess I'll just pay those fees.

>nchain.com/en/blog/nchain-innovation-computational-flexibility-using-the-blockchain/

That's not a draft, that patent tries to patent a general idea of turing complete scripting without any implementation details. It's also worthless because it would apply to ethereum which was the first. Pure patent trolling.
It's also laughably incorrect: "The Ethereum blockchain platform approaches this is
sue by incorporating a “built in”
Turing complete language called Solidity". That's not a claim so it doesn't invalidate the patent in itself but it shows what a fucking clown Wright is.

>nchain.com/app/uploads/2017/07/Proof-of-Work-and-the-Firm.pdf

Are you just going to dump random articles by this faggot? You are in effect trying to DOS me. Summarize the argument.

>If you are poor living in a poor place
>They already do that in shithole countries

???
Not everyone who lives in a poor country is poor.

>Eth scalability problems are due to propagation and verification time, not block size limit.
Look, I said from the beginning there are really only two coins in crypto. Ethereum and BCH. I like BCH you prefer Eth, cool beans. No other coins have developers like these two and no other coins are capable of things like these two. As a final point block propogation is less of an issue when you don't expect home computers to run your full nodes. That's why I like BCH, it expects industrial capacity machines to run its system. I don't think home computers can match industrial machines.

When do you plan to cash out of bitcoin?

This is the final redpill.
BCH/ETH split it the only 100% viable long term hold with guaranteed gains right now.

BCH faggot

BCC = bitconnect

How can you be so pathetic ? do you support BCH ? You are arguments are pure joke.

>You are arguments
Illiterate corecucks. No surprises ITT

Why didn't you post the full text you tard.

>“If I sign myself Jean-Paul Sartre it is not the same thing as if I sign myself Jean-Paul Sartre, Nobel Prizewinner” – Jean-Paul Sartre, 1964
I remember reading that quote many years ago, and I have carried it with me uncomfortably ever since. However, after many years, and having experienced the ebb and flow of life those years have brought, I think I am finally at peace with what he meant. If I sign Craig Wright, it is not the same as if I sign Craig Wright, Satoshi.

This is what Craig posted. Unless you are a retard you would realize he is saying he doesn't want to be known as Satoshi, so he won't prove it. What makes you think he would quote a man who turned down a nobel prize and say how it applies to him unless he was turning down something of extreme significance? Why can't any of you think? I'm not saying he is Satoshi, but only a complete brainlet would assume he was trying to prove he was Satoshi with this post.

I did not format that correctly. Craig's full post is what follows.

"If I sign myself Jean-Paul Sartre it is not the same thing as if I sign myself Jean-Paul Sartre, Nobel Prizewinner” – Jean-Paul Sartre, 1964
I remember reading that quote many years ago, and I have carried it with me uncomfortably ever since. However, after many years, and having experienced the ebb and flow of life those years have brought, I think I am finally at peace with what he meant. If I sign Craig Wright, it is not the same as if I sign Craig Wright, Satoshi.

Read blog.erratasec.com/2016/05/satoshi-how-craig-wrights-deception.html instead of falling for a bunch of damage-controlling BS.

He's a fraud and you're falling for it by pulling on the ambiguous and non-falsifiable threads he's leaving for you. Classic con artist trick

You're joking right. The hash you posted was literally posted with this text and statement. What do you want from me? I literally completed the partial evidence you provided. They are both the same piece of evidence. Everyone knows what he provided wasn't proof. The only people Craig showed real proof to were Gavin Andresen and Jon Matonis. Gavin built a new computer before Craig proved who he was through his private keys so we know Craig didn't hack Gavin's computer. We don't know for sure whether Gavin saw legitimate evidence as we weren't there, but Gavin has never backtracked on his claim Craig is Satoshi. All I'm saying is there are only two people in the world (other than Craig) who know whether or not Craig is Satoshi and they both say Craig is Satoshi. Please stop with this entry level bullshit you are doing. I know Craig didn't provide public evidence, but he literally tells you in the post you are providing that he wasn't going to provide public evidence and you are acting like its some big fraud. If the guy tells you flat out he won't prove it and then he doesn't prove it why would you be surprised?

Obviously the dictators and warlords are well fed. Try leaving your comfy boarders and visiting a less polished country.

I like you anons. April 2018. It is known

bitsonline.com/matonis-wright-linked-firm-nchain/
Also why would Jon Matonis immediately go and work for Craig if he knew Craig was a fraud. Remember, Jon knows for a fact whether or not Craig is Satoshi and he immediately became Craig's employee. Again I'm not saying I know if Craig is Satoshi, because I don't. But those who do trust him.

Did you even try to replicate the steps in the blog?

You, too, can prove you're satoshi.

>Please stop with this entry level bullshit you are doing.
Your argument is literally "he quoted Sartre and Sartre and Sartre turned down public recognition, therefore Craig Wright is Satoshi!!!"

I think I will choose cryptography as evidence over pretentious references to dead existentialist philosophers.

bitcoin core will go the way of the dodo when they realise just how mongoloid LN is. That is, if they ever even get it out of the door.

It's a pajeet attempting to seem normal as you see with the overdone meme bullshit and blatant Ver attack

>Also why would Jon Matonis immediately go and work for Craig if he knew Craig was a fraud. Remember, Jon knows for a fact whether or not Craig is Satoshi and he immediately became Craig's employee
This is an appeal to authority. We don't know Jon Matonis' motivations so why speculate about them?

>Obviously the dictators and warlords are well fed. Try leaving your comfy boarders and visiting a less polished country.

How is that an answer to:
>A poor person is going to buy a bunch of antminers and mine profitably?

Are you finally agreeing that no, poor people in poor countries aren't going to buy an antminer s9 and mine profitably?

You are probably replying to Craig himself. All he does all day every day is post diatribes online claiming he doesn't care what people think about him. He hasn't demonstrated yet that he has any valuable technical or organisational skills to offer anybody, except defrauding the Australian government of $30m AUD. Even without that cunt bch is needed. You can't even transact on btc anymore.

That never happened. Gavin paid for a laptop to be bought from a store in London but it was an underling of Craig who bought it. Gavin also claimed after the fact that he didn't attempt to verify the signatures in depth. He just watched Craig do it on a machine provided by his assistant and believed him. He even said after the fact that he was way to trusting. He was tricked.

I despise Craig's writing style. It shows how he isn't technically proficient at all and can only speak in buzzwords. Every one of his patent applications are total garbage rehashing existing work in his own shitty writing style. Is there anyone from the community officially objecting to these trash patents?

BCH is superior.
Nobody knows whether Craig is Satoshi but he probably is.

Copelets will be FOMOing into BCH soon.

>Your argument is literally "he quoted Sartre and Sartre and Sartre turned down public recognition, therefore Craig Wright is Satoshi!!!
No my argument is that you are saying he tried to prove he was Satoshi while using as evidence a post where Craig said he would never prove he was Satoshi. I keep telling you I don't know if he is Satoshi. How do you not understand? Why do you keep saying Craig was trying to prove he was Satoshi with that hash when he was blatantly saying he would never prove he was Satoshi? What has you confused?

>Nobody knows whether Craig is Satoshi but he probably is.

>No my argument is that you are saying he tried to prove he was Satoshi while using as evidence a post where Craig said he would never prove he was Satoshi
So your argument is literally non-falsifiable? Nice, good to know you believe in bullshit.

>That never happened. Gavin paid for a laptop to be bought from a store in London but it was an underling of Craig who bought it. Gavin also claimed after the fact that he didn't attempt to verify the signatures in depth. He just watched Craig do it on a machine provided by his assistant and believed him. He even said after the fact that he was way to trusting. He was tricked.
Redoing my homework you are right it was a laptop and he didn't build a desktop. But it was not a Craig underling who bought it and it hadn't been tampered with before Gavin turned it on (not sure if Gavin bought it himself, but if it wasn't he went with whoever bought it). Also Gavin still says he wasn't tricked and he would know as that is his profession.
ccn.com/gavin-andersen-craig-wright-blog-mistake/

>We don't know Jon Matonis' motivations so why speculate about them?
We don't know Craig Wrights motivations so why speculate about them?

Real SN didn't come forward to disprove Craig. Or maybe CW killed the real SN or knows the real SN is dead?
Now thats speculation, brainlet.

Him being an angry unlikeable australian diesnt mean he isnt Satoshi.
Even if he proves it 100% many reditors wont accept it because they want SN to be an utopian cyber-communist. Not a full on libertarian capitalist.

>So your argument is literally non-falsifiable?
No, my argument is that you are a dumbass for continuing to say that Craig was trying to prove he was Satoshi while using as evidence a post where Craig says he will never prove he was Satoshi. How do you still not understand? Craig never tried to publicly prove he was Satoshi. That means each time in this thread you repeated that Craig's public proof was invalid you were simply relaying to the rest of us you are retarded as no such event ever occurred. What you keep using as evidence for your point is literally evidence that Craig never tried to publicly prove he was Satoshi. Why is this so hard for you? Just say you were wrong guy. It's not that hard. I'm not asking you to say Craig is Satoshi, I'm asking you to say that Craig publicly admitted he would never prove it.

Ill definitely take profits after the next pump.
And I do believe BTC has some juice left in it profits-wise. Just dont think the coin has any future longterm. But Im certainly not selling now after it has crashed like this.

>Him being an angry unlikeable australian diesnt mean he isnt Satoshi.
So do you believe him forging a signature on some random text is proof that he's satoshi? Serious question.

>So do you believe him forging a signature on some random text is proof that he's satoshi?
And now we have more retards? Do you not understand that entire post was him saying he would never prove he was Satoshi? How are you idiots so dense? I don't understand how Craig Wright can come out and say "I will never prove I am Satoshi." and then you idiots say 'Oh look at that his proof he is Satoshi is invalid'. Of course it is you dimwit, the so-called "proof" you are alluding to is him saying he would never prove it.

>Craig says he will never prove he was Satoshi
So it literally can't be verified or proven incorrect that he's satoshi. aka non-falsifiable. Any claims to him being Satoshi are pure bullshit, just as valid as me claiming I'm satoshi (but I'll never prove it!)

Kinda convenient that when he has to provide real cryptographic evidence he suddenly welches out on his retarded claims, huh? And then all his retarded fanboys claim "oh well he said he'd never prove it so clearly that means it's him! look, he quoted Sartre!".

Pseuds worshipping a pseud fraud.

No I believe I don't know whether he is satoshi.
But I think its very likely he fucked up the proof on purpose since outing himself for real would destroy his and his families life.

He only came forward with the fake proof after there was a raid on his home with "satoshi nakamoto" on the warrant and after someone leaked a dump of his emailacc to some newspaper.

Being known as fraud is easier than being known as the creator of bitcoin who holds 1 million BTC, BCH, BTG.

Imagine the amount of media attention and hacking attempts and kidnapping attempts he would get if it was 100% proven he was SN.

>Do you not understand that entire post was him saying he would never prove he was Satoshi
Because it's bullshit.

I'll never prove I'm Satoshi either. I guess according to your brainlet logic that means I'm Satoshi.

You know the reason public-key crypto exists is to ensure trustless verification and communication right? You believing blindly that he's satoshi is almost in complete contradiction to that.

Gavin's quotes in that article are open to interpretation. He never said as a fact that Craig verified his identity, only that he was convinced on a personal level, and that he expected proof to be forthcoming. The prevailing theory among security professionals at the time is based on analysis of the timeline leading up to Craig's "big reveal":

Satoshi's old email, forum, and other online accounts were hacked by an outside party, no information in them had been deleted. The accounts were likely initially hacked on behalf of Craig wright, who used the information to trick Gavin and others to build a profile of him being satoshi, since he had all of satoshi and Gavin's old communications. Separately, Craig also made a trust in a tax haven claiming to own all of the satoshi coins totalling about half a billion at the time, then used that as evidence to the Australian government that he had financial reserves to pay them in case of him being convicted for fraud by the aus gov. There is a bunch more evidence that supports this hypothesis.

Why would Craig spend 6 years defrauding the Australian government of research grants if he was really satoshi, had access to the satoshi coins, and intended to set up an offshore trust to make the funds accessible either directly or to lend against? Craight wright stinks of shit to high heaven. He is almost certainly a conman and everything he has done since the reveal has supported that, including patenting existing block chain technology as his own IP, and making massive grandiose claims about what he is doing in regards to development of BCH. There is no evidence he himself or anyone who works for him is doing any substantial work on ANY crypto technology.

>You can only mine bitcoin on ant miners

And you once again show how fucking ignorant you are.

Why not support both coins? Unless you're a newfag that didn't hold any during the fork?

BTC has dropped 70% market share in the past year. It won't be long before we hear the death rattle.

whoa i'm convinced, btc is worthless

If you try mining bch on a non-asic all you are going is waste money for electricity. You would be way better just buying coins for that money. The key word is profitable. Stop trolling.

All mining does is incentivize the creation of giant mining farms owned by rich people.