Solution to inflation

Give me ONE (1) good reason why the U.S. couldn't fix a lot of its econimoic problems by printing more money and, WITHOUT ANNOUNCING IT, covertly feed it into the economy?

Inflation only goes up when people know that there are more dollars in circulation, yes?

>fuck man bread costs 10k wtf is going on. It can't be inflation they wouldve told us

How do you think money is fed into the economy

I laughed out loud jesus christ

Because that would be lying, and the government would never lie.

holy fuck being this level of retard

>Print more money
>Feed it into the economy
>Everything is super expensive now
>????
>Pay debts

What's step 3?

It's known as Helicopter money and it's more of a safety net. I guarantee you they did that after '08, it's ineffective if you do it all the time and then worth shit when you need it.

They don't just magically float the shit in, what the fuck do you think the fed does? tip toe into banks and give secret bonuses to businesses - dumb fuck

Raze duh minermum wage

...

>>Everything is super expensive now
Somehow threaten, cajole, or otherwise persuade a SMALL pool of top employees at giants like Amazon, Wal-Mart, Alphabet etc (who have surely commited crimes of some kind) to keep prices the same while we pay down our debts.

Idk man.

it would create hyperinflation

your $1 only has the buying power of $1 in relation to all USD in circulation

so if you double the amount of USD in circulation for example, your $1 becomes worth half as much relatively. That's why cost of living keeps going up year by year, because the value of the dollar keeps decreasing, and people require more of them. it's an unsustainable long term economy, which is why crypto is almost certain to gain mainstream adoption eventually

Thanks for the meme op

I was asking the OP a question not posing a rhetorical question affirming his post

>whites,black,latinos become rich
>no work or produce is made because no incentive
>people in voluntary military leave
>us becomes defenseless
>no farms to feed population since walmarts, starbucks, and malls destroyed land
>whites blame minorities for commercialization of things even though it was whites who did it

How would you "covertly" feed it into the economy?

something like this maybe

>really makes me think
It's an interesting philosophical question guys. Like the old adage, "if a tree falls in the forest and nobody is around, does it make a noise?"
If the government doesn't tell us about new money being printed, does it actually exist?

Pumping money into the economy covertly completely defeats the purpose of increasing the money supply. The point of increasing the money supply (Quantitative Easing) is to spur spending by increasing inflationary expectations. People find out that the fed is printing money so the spend their money on stuff before that stuff becomes more expensive. By doing it covertly, the fed fails to stoke inflationary expectations.

Even when the fed signaled to the economy that it would be increasing the money supply through QE, they still failed to stoke inflation or inflationary expectations. The reason is something called a liquidity trap, which Japan also experienced in the late 90's though today. The mechanism by which the fed injects cash into the system is by buying treasuries from primary dealers right after the auction with freshly minted cash. The fed then holds the treasuries on its balance shit. The idea is that the banks will then lend up to %1000 of the money out (fractional reserve banking) thus boosting business spending, which in turn stokes hiring, wage inflation, increase aggregate demand, and most importantly, inflationary expectations. The problem the fed ran in to is that the economy was already so overleveraged that there were very few credit worthy borrowers, and those that were credit worthy didn't need the credit as it wasn't a good environment for business expansion and there were few opportunites to earn positive ROI. The result is that all the freshly injected cash sat on bank balance sheets and did not make it into the real economy. Banks then used that money for the only profitable activity they could find: trading (ie blowing bubbles)

hope that answers your question

Setup and fund fake business with fake cash flow to invest into assets. The only people that would notice are smart enough to keep their mouth shut and drink in the free money

So the problem they should be trying to solve is finding a new way to inject cash, then.

But wouldn't it be more valuable to have your printed money be worth more since it hasn't spurred inflation yet? Then you can start QE and what was have been a pitiful growth rate looks higher due to all the new money floating around no ones knows was free?

Pumping money into the economy covertly completely defeats the entire purpose of the token.

Bypassing the banks and giving the money directly to the people would probably have been much more effective. However, if people used the money to pay down debt or save, it still wouldn't have the desired effect. That being said, the fed would never do that as they are a private bank owned by it's member banks, so any solution will involve giving the banksters money and fucking the people. People are waking up to this and that is one reason why crypto is blowing up.

Imagine you had 1 trillion XLM.
now try selling it on the market without lowering the price.

Same shit with printing trillions of USD.

This only works if banks lend the money and the people spend the money. Otherwise it just sits on bank balance sheets and has no impact on the real economy.

Not really. The fed doesn't sell the USD on the forex market, it buys treasuries from banks. If you look at the US dollar index chart it actually appreciated in value for most of quantitative easing.

babby's first monetary policy

you could also look at CPI, but it ends up the same at the end. If QE hadn't been done, the dollar would have appreciated even further.
Banks lend more freely when treasury purchases spike, correct?
Freer loans means people are willing to borrow more for a house.

Theoretically yes, however after the housing bubble the government drastically tightened lending standards and a lot of people had just had their credit ruined in a foreclusure so there weren't very many credit worthy borrowers. Those that were credit worthy already had houses. The money really went into asset markets. Look at the ratio of homes purchased in cash vs mortgage before QE and after.

where do i look up such stats?

Do you think Venezuela or Imbalance is like hey we're going to print a quadrillion dollars ahead of time?

yes

lmao

lol nigga like how are poor people real just print some more money lmao

kek