My dog ate the private keys for my 1,100,000 bitcoins and my log ins but check out this cool math scribble!

>mfw newfags don't know about the Tulip Trust

see

This "evidence" was brought out by Wired and Gizmodo. Not by Craig Wright. So why are you claiming that Craig scammed everyone when he didn't publicly release this and even tried not to verify himself as Satoshi. Ever watched the GQ interview where they try and get him to verify he is Satoshi? He was pissed off. It's not Craig's fault that reporters got their information wrong so why are you blaming him?

no thanks faggot, I've made my bets

There's no point reading the articles anyway, all they say is that reporters from the Wired and Gizmodo magazines got their information wrong. It has nothing to do with Craig whatsoever but this idiot can't even read.

You

Did you read the article? All of this evidence was from the reporters of the magazines and never released by Craig. Yet you are saying Craig is scamming people when he never came out to prove he was Satoshi to anyone but Andresen and Matonis. If you can't understand that I can't help you. I'm just saying all Craig has ever done publicly is say he will never prove publicly that he is Satoshi. I'm not sure how you make the leap in logic to say he is scamming people into believing he is Satoshi when it was others who tried to prove he was and then Craig declined to prove it himself.

ccn.com/gavin-andersen-craig-wright-blog-mistake/

Can you even read?
>Bitcoin core developer Gavin Andresen has expressed regret in publishing his blog backing Craig Wright’s claim that he is, Satoshi Nakamoto. More specifically, Andresen claims it was a mistake to publish his post before the much-scrutinized post published by Craig Wright.
All he said was it was a mistake to blog about it before Craig proved it as it put Gavin in a weird spot.

>Still, Andresen believes that Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto citing Wright’s possession of the private key from the first bitcoin block as cryptographic proof. He added: It’s possible that I’m wrong [about Craig Wright], but I don’t think I am.
Gavin never backtracked that he thinks Craig is Satoshi. He says its possible Craig is not, but he thinks Craig is. How dumb do you have to be to post an article that directly contradicts yourself.

seebitcoin.com/2016/05/heres-how-craig-wright-probably-tricked-gavin-andresen/

>There’s a bit of a smoking gun here. A factory seal doesn’t prove something hasn’t been tampered with any more than writing ‘this is genuine’ on a CD makes it genuine. Instead of buying a laptop himself, he allowed one of Wright’s representatives to source the laptop. This means the laptop can no longer be considered ‘clean’. It could have been preloaded with modified software, either to trick the computer into downloading a modified version of Electrum, or by modifying a legitimately downloaded version of Electrum during or after installation.

>It is also very suspect that Wright insisted on keeping the laptop and USB stick without a compelling reason after the demonstration as that would have allowed Andresen to verify the test.

youtube.com/watch?v=2qLI3VIHuKU

I don't think anyone alive says Craig is Satoshi unless you are talking about Gavin and Jon. Everyone else just says it could be. The only person who can prove it either way is Craig and he said publicly he won't do it. So why make an issue out of this when you won't make any progress either way?

Is there any reason to NOT believe he is Satoshi? He is pretty much a genius after all.