LINK white paper

What the fuck is this? You guys told me to read the white paper and it's just a bunch of nonsense bullshit?


Does anyone here even understand what this is saying?

uh if you don't understand that you are literally nigger tier IQ

its saids that 9/11 was an inside job.

>maths and algorithms, proof of concept
>no buzzwords and get rich quick bait

buy mobius pajeet

>whitepaper in LaTeX with equations you dont understand
BUY BUY BUY BUY BUY

>only had singings and clappings back in school
there, there, user. Can you swim at least?

>I cant understand this so therefore its nonsense bullshit

white stupid shoo mobius not bag am not lie mobius win big try stink link

that would be really funny, we'ren't it way too fucking true and epidemic.

>Mathematics is nonsense bullshit

LITERALLY the language of the universe, the language of God.

Brainlets don't deserve this beautiful piece of art from the LINK team

and then it hit me. Like a diamond bullet to my forhead

OP here I read the raibocks white paper it's way better and makes way more sense I'm going all in.

>ITT people pretend they understand it

They are just trying to trick you, buy mobius. Simple and good whitepaper

>reading the white paper

LinkConnect wrote a pretty good LaTeX whitepaper back in 2014.

It’s just unfortunate that they don’t know how to program what they’ve theorized.

You gave academic daydreamers $30mm even though they aren’t old school, elite, tested programmers.

You got owned.

That's the point, they told that if you don't understand the whitepaper it means that it's a great project.

But the whitepaper is full of random stuff without any sense that no one can understand, so, while they're scamming you, they also let you think that you're retarded.

Lol ok fag by all means do that

yes white no good mobius big try india no lie stupid stink link

Nice

Did people really fall for this? I have a degree in applied mathematics and working on my phD, and this doesnt account for a lot of things. I finally looked through the white paper and it's as if the person writing it picked up a mathbook and cut and pasted things into this paper. Huge sell signal. Shouldve never listened to you biz

i understood all of it, and i have to say... big if true

that equation looks like shit, dc if its latex or not

It's a logical parameter. If you got a math major, CS major, or like me dabbled in some of it for engineering, then you know what's going on.

desu that proves link is a scam

I had this two years ago in my system modeling class. You aren’t a low IQ nigger or are you?

>scoffs at you in superior genius

literally learned this shit in high school, were you raised in a village OP?

...

discord.gg
/2Hyz8Nj

I might ask on a math forum what that means, 100% it's bullshit

I just translated the equation for you fucking idiots! You're welcome

In all seriousness, what does that formula mean?

Please do and post results I'll send you like .05 ETH

it's the solution to the big mac problem

Here is a decryption for brainlets

...

...

it doesn't mean anything at all unless the symbols and functions in it are defined

Fuck that. The equation would made that car black and LINKblue.
You made a mistake somewhere bro.

>whole point of a whitepaper is to be understandable
>include arbitrary nonsense equations to look smart

>You made a mistake somewhere bro.
Nah i applied it to the shadow link token.

The white paper is peer-reviewed.
Not to mention co-authored by Ari Juels.
Pretty sure it makes sense.

Go cry in the corner.

You'd think the whitepaper would put some text around such a formula, explaining a bit what it's good for and what it's supposed to do...

Stay impoverished. I’m coming for you retard.

is right. Everyone around here acts all smart and smug yet no Linkie scum has been able to provide an explanation on what any of this means. Literally random math-looking mumbo jumbo to make idiots think it's all complex and intellectual. Kind of like those stock images, where someone writes on a whiteboard and when you look closer, none of it means anything.

very poorly done latex equations

Doesn't look that complicated. It's just notation, I mean, how am I supposed to know what sigma_att, etc is supposed to mean?

as if you have even seen the white paper. for all you know the explanation could be cut off.

The guy you're quoting was being sarcastic you dunce.
Everything in the formula is accounted for in the body of the whitepaper.

shhh just let him feel important

Looks like shitty latex skills.