Yo whats the point of this coin when NEO and XLM exist??

Yo whats the point of this coin when NEO and XLM exist??

Other urls found in this thread:

stellar.org/developers/guides/concepts/fees.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

to maximize bagholders

that coin doesn't exist

> fees
> XLM inflationary
> smart contracts are a meme

do your own research, ape

NEO and XLM failed because they try to imitate Ethereum.
XRB on the other hand just specializes in fast and free transactions without a trade-off, which is a hole in the market.
It's easily going to take LTC's spot for transfers and might blow up if it gets adoption for payments.

Feeless transfers, near instant transfers, decentralized, exponentially more transfers per second possible.

Neither of those can check more than 2 of those boxes.

XRP and XLM both do this. Not technically free but you would have to make 10k transactions to = 1c USD. They both take 2-3 seconds to finish a transaction.

XRB is a pointless Reddit meme. It literally does nothing unique.

True

>crying about 1% inflation a year and virtually non existent fees

XRP's thing is bank adoption, which is a failure.
XLM tries to compete with Ethereum, which I already said, and that was one of the reasons for it failing.
Look at XRM, it's only saving grace is anonymity, but since it's specialized and has good support it thrives. Simplicity sells.

>SCAM ALERT!!!

XRP is centralized. Opposite of what this whole thing is about.

Exponential more transfers per second than either.

>XRP and XLM both do this. Not technically free but you would have to make 10k transactions to = 1c USD.
>Doesn't understand that XLM's fees aren't flat and will increase as adoption increases
>XRP, got me there
>Thinks that anyone would ever choose to pay fees, no matter how small they are, if they have the option not to

This

what's the point of any coin besides bitcoin? the answer is none. the market will realize this eventually.

>NEO failed
what

Assuming you're not a advocate of decentralization to the core, no coin compares to NEO and EOS.

Crowdfunding. There are over 1500 business upcoming on Ethereum alone in the next half year.

>There are over 1500 business upcoming on Ethereum alone in the next half year.
none of which need blockchain and would all be better suited using other technology.

But those are both centralized where one person owns 80% of the coins. Fuck that. Those are just high quality scan coins

>> why use the better coin instead of my shit bags?

I dont know why you fucks cant realize xrb is the logical trading pair. That alone gives it worth. Besides that, when you think in the long term its actually pioneering cryptoCURRENCY morons.

> muh smartcontracts
> muh dapps
> muh proof of stake
> muh partnerships

XRB does not care. A normie can understand if. Fast, no fees. That’s it.

The foundation only holds 5% of the coins and most of them are probably reserved for testing and their bug bounty program. Anons this shit is disruptive as fuck, and if you can’t realize this there is no hope for you.

Let these morons sleep. Litecoin was $3 exactly 1 year ago. Let that sink in. Xrb is 10 times better in every way. Just let them be retards

What's the point of Bitcoin when there's Nano? The answer is none. The market will realize this eventually.

Obviously you don't understand how our lizard brain works with money. Autism is likely.

XLM is already fast and free and also offers a stable network and ico's. Again, no reason to use some untested shitcoin that eventually does less. Enjoy your bags

Greed will do you in user.

How does it feel that XLM isnt even focusing on being a currency and already is a more stable and secure fast and free coin than your xrb memecoin? I swear the jokes write themselves ...

>free
Well there's no need to lie here user. No one in their right mind would say that XLM has no place in the market. But once again, if you think anyone in their right mind would choose to pay fees, no matter how small, over paying no fees for a simple transaction at a store or whatever, you're deluded.

> free

Ok

Fees are close to 0.
You get part of the 1% inflation if you join a pool
Also need smart contracts for icos.

Yeah that's exactly the problem.

I'm not sure what greed has to do with the topic but ok.

> ICO’s
More shitcoins that aren’t needed you mean?

I'm starting to grow seriously concerned that XLM users don't understand how the fees work with XLM. This is coming from an XLM holder.

The normies will also experience the downsides of fast and free memecoins when volume picks up. Enjoy your zero network security bags. Again, no reason to use it over XLM which is an actual battle tested fast and free coin that can do ico's and smartcontracts on top.

WTF I transfered Nano from Kucoin to binance and it says transaction complete but I still don't have anything in Binance!!! This fucking coin is a scam!!!

Then why is it taking forever?!?!?!?

Jesus bro we get it, those XLM bags are heavy as fuck.

>deluded

Coming from the cult who brainwashed themselves into thinking a non unique coin is unique. Thats rich

Was this coin unironically named after the Rai Stone, or was the developer a smart ass?

exchange problem not xrb

Unironically named after Rai.
It's literally how cryptocurrencys work.

rai is lightning in nip

>Tries to attack the legitimacy of the technology behind Nano by calling it a memecoin, but doesn't actually provide any arguments
>Doesn't seem to understand how XLM fees work
I guess there's no point in continuing this conversation. Don't worry, there is a future for XLM, I just don't think you clearly understand it. Good luck user

Pathetic. I guess that 90% of your portfolio is in
former "shitcoins" that you didn't see before it was too late
How many % does the marketcap have to go up before a tranaction is even 1 cent?

> I’m assuming you don’t understand the flood of ICOs are deligitimizing the reputation of this market

There are plenty of arguments, but the xrb cult is specialized into turning blind eyes to real issues. And lets start with how a legit argument in favor of XRB first, pro tip, you cant. You are as deluded as it gets.

As is Bitconnect's scam, Coincheck's hack, Ripple's centralisation, USDT's printing and shitton of other shady business in crypto.
You should preach against Ethereum

This

Nice ad hominem to an entire group without providing any logic

Just answer this simple question then, you walk into a coffee shop. You can seamlessly pay with two options: one option you pay with a very small micro fee, the second option you pay with no fee. Don't dodge this question, just answer it. Which do you choose?

stellar.org/developers/guides/concepts/fees.html
I'm not going to do the math for you, but answer my above question too if you will. Don't dance around the bush, just tell me which one you would choose. (Smart contracts, while having value, do not provide any value in this situation. Both options are totally seamless.)

Because Bitcoin is 10 years old and scales like shit. It fails in a scenario where the whole world adopts it, which is where crypto is trying to go.

You haven't asked me anything. Also you're a XRB acolyte posing as a XLM holder, you know next to nothing it seems.
When fees get to high they say it will get adjusted through a consensus, or in worst case a fork.

>You haven't asked me anything.
>You can seamlessly pay with two options: one option you pay with a very small micro fee, the second option you pay with no fee. Don't dodge this question, just answer it. Which do you choose?
I specifically said not to dodge the question.

The one that the coffee shop accepts
Pic related, it's you

people trust bitcoin, not nano.

...

>It fails in a scenario where the whole world adopts it
nano would fail if it even got the point of btc's current adaptation.

>Dodges question
>Forgets to attach picture
>Getting nervous

>The one that the coffee shop accepts
I specifically said that the coffee shop accepts both options. Now let's try this once more. One more chance buddy, you can do this.

You can seamlessly pay with two options for your coffee: one option you pay with a very small micro fee, the second option you pay with no fee. Which do you choose?

Feeless
Fast
Infinitely Scalable

No other coin has these three characteristics

>Personal attacks instead of using legitimate arguments
You're losing credibility, quickly, to the lurkers reading this user. Better shape up quickly before you lose all of your ground

Here’s the reason to test “an untested shitcoin”

Sure pays to do your research, the pic attached is literally Checkov’s gun.

It's going to disrupt Burstcoin hard.

Nice try soyboy. I wonder if you're such a weak cunt that you really think green texts have any effects on others because they do on you.

I would not care the slightest as long as the fee is under 50c. As won't 90% of the population. Therefore it's a stupid question. You'd pick the one that makes it easier for you. However if they're both JUST as easy and function in the exact same way you of course pick the free one.
Though; saying they're exactly the same is stupidity incarnate

For a company that processes thousands of transactions a day. Do you really think they will share your same sentiment that .50c means nothing. Or any fee for that matter

This.

As i've already said. it will have to go up by an incredible amount of market cap to even reach that... which it won't
AND the fees are adjustable

This. This. This. So much this. XRB will dump harder than bitconnect soon.

>More aggressive personal attacks
>Getting real upset at this point
Maybe stick to less name calling and try and present your case based on sound arguments and rationality, people will take you more seriously.

>Therefore it's a stupid question.
I didn't ignore your stupid questions, so humor mine buddy
>function in the exact same way you of course pick the free one.
Interesting
>Though; saying they're exactly the same is stupidity incarnate
So you're trying to tell me that XLM would process the transaction faster than XRB?

Assuming I owned both, obviously no fees. However, I wouldn't move my assets from the micro-fee platform to the no-fee platform if there was any other reason to stay on it.

You're right, which is why I never said XLM doesn't have a place on the market. In fact, I think XLM is a good investment. But ignoring the benefits of Nano because of an emotional attachment to a coin is just bad investing

...

There is no value in the coin that costs 0 to transact...why would u hold xrb of nobody gets a cut? your buying a free coin...

You accidentally hit the nail on the head.
Which one will the coffee shop have incentive to accept?
Feecoin that can do ICO's
Nofeecoin.

is it that hard to split your holdings between nano, xlm, xrp, eth and neo?

nobody knows which one of those will make it to the daily normie business, but chanes are high that its one of them, so holding them all is the safest bet in the long run

>However, I wouldn't move my assets from the micro-fee platform to the no-fee platform if there was any other reason to stay on it.
I should have been more direct in countering this point here. My point is that I think about 99% of the population will not care about the smart capabilities that XLM and ETH have. If you look at ETH right now, majority of crypto enthusiast use it purely as a currency in the same way that Nano is capable of doing. Hardly anyone uses it as gas to deploy a contract on the platform. While I do think as smart currencies gain in use cases the amount of people who take advantage of that functionality will increase, most people will still just use it as a currency. And at the moment, Nano is doing that the best right now.

I am open to arguments if anyone has any though, and don't worry, I won't stoop to calling you a faggot, deluded, etc etc if we don't agree on something. I don't need to, I'm confident enough in my opinions on the matter.

I feel an absurd amount of fedora tipping coming from this post.

That said; I've been on the fence on putting money into XRB. I even had a limit buy order waiting for it to dip more, but the rebrand fucked me. That said, XRB is a mid term investment. There'll probably be a blockchain 5.0 in half a year that makes nano less impressive

This.

No. The coin that is backed by banks so that the business is certain it can get the funds tranferred into fiat

So...fiat?

Smart contracts are crucial for finance instituations. It creates a trustless environment
In the end, yes. At least for many years

You are as deluded as it gets if you think your memecoin is better because it transacts in 2.5seconds instead of 3seconds. Especially if it achieves it by throwing its network security and stability out of the window.

Good question OP I was thinking the same thing. Unironically just bought more XMR.

Fiat it is, boys.
Zero fees and wideley acceptable with many onramps and offramps to banking.
Pack it up, it was a fun ride while it lasted.

>go to the casino
>place your money on black and red
>can't lose

>Zero fees in fiat
no

if i knew one of the options will 1000x my money, i have no problem losing a fraction of my initial investment. but yeah, why diversify a portfolio. only dumbasses do that right

it's actually not about the blockchain though... it's about avoiding venture-capital fundraising regulations via the blockchain.

for normal vc and crowdfunding for a publicly traded company for example you need to be an accredited investor and all sorts of nonsense that a startup can't really get in on. using neo/eth as a platform reduces the overhead significantly, and although this means there's plenty of amateur, shit-tier projects that will try to appear legitimate, it doesn't negate the fact that some will be absolutely killer.

stay poor something something pajeet yadda yadda

>I feel an absurd amount of fedora tipping coming from this post.
Why continue the name calling? Do we have to act like children to have a conversation?
>That said; I've been on the fence on putting money into XRB. I even had a limit buy order waiting for it to dip more, but the rebrand fucked me. That said, XRB is a mid term investment. There'll probably be a blockchain 5.0 in half a year that makes nano less impressive
If better technology comes out that makes Nano redundant you bet I'm moving my money there. But unless Nano runs into some serious issues I'm not sure how you can get much better than nearly instantaneous and fee-less by design. I am open minded though, maybe there is a better system that just hasn't been thought of yet.
Also, just to reiterate, I definitely do think there is a market for currencies with smart functionalities and I have money in them. I try not to get tunnel vision with these things.

I think in the future when cryptocurrencies become more adopted by merchants and whatnot, people will get to choose from a large list of options. Something like REQ (not necessarily them, but similar) will make it as easy as flipping a switch to start accepting a long list of currencies.

there are loads of Ethereum dapps going mainstream in the next few months brainlet. when the best argument for your coin is "smart contracts don't matter" you have already lost. this coin is a meme.

Accreditation is a good thing though, as it protects people from themselves. That is, unless you think these new shitcoins rolling out with no product deserve $300m market caps.

>stay poor
I'm an accredited investor.

Yup, like I said I see that they definitely have a use case.
>Name calling
>Network security and stability
This argument is used with every single new coin that does something different and hits the market. Only time will tell how secure it is. You have to take some risks to push the boundaries. Same arguments were made with Bitcoin, Litecoin, Ethereum, etc.

>Name calling
>Saying that I said "smart contracts don't matter"
You haven't actually read any of this conversation, have you?

It's fun because you're so taken aback every single time. Welcome to anonymity, don't waste so much effort in getting people to sing combaya together in the future...
Just know that we need the smart contracts more than people are aware of. People think it's a meme and that ICO's are all smart contracts are good for, but that's not true. You'd not be able to for example solve logistics problems without smart contracts.

If something feeless and infinitely scalable with smart contracts and other good shit appears I'd be the first one to go all in

>It's fun because you're so taken aback every single time.
I'm not taken back, I just don't get what you think it accomplishes beyond making you look like you're getting worked up over a simple discussion
>Just know that we need the smart contracts more than people are aware of.
Did you read that earlier I said that smart capabilities in cryptocurrencies absolutely have value and a future?
>If something feeless and infinitely scalable with smart contracts and other good shit appears I'd be the first one to go all in
You might want to look into IOTA if they ever get their head out of their asses

If that's the case you must think more than half of biz is worked up on every single thread
Hate the IOTA team. They seem like amateurs. But I'll keep my eyes open in case they actually manage to do fuck all.

I mean I get it, it is an anonymous board and people like to act like emotional animals because of it
Doesn't upset me when someone does, it just makes a potentially productive conversation into a pointless one
I hate the IOTA team too, I think David is a douche. I think they might be over their heads since they can't even get a decent wallet working. At the same time I don't write them off because they really are they only ones tackling the "feeless and infinitely scalable with smart contracts" market. If somehow they do pull it off, they're going to be in a very nice position in the long run