PRESS S TO SPIT ON ITS GRAVE

It's just sending 0 back and forth. Someone explain.

stay mad and poor you filthy coin nigger

you fell for the scam, now you eat your losses

it's an overflow bug. if you send 0.0000000001 xrb it shows as zero, but credits you with 2x that amount every transaction.

Really? Can anyone demonstrate with a video?

I'm not writing you off as FUD btw, it would just be nice to see a video demonstration. Explorer alone doesn't provide the evidence you speak of.

relax faggot, you wouldent be able to use it unless you can script

FUCK THE XRB DEVS

BUY THE DIP

Then why is the "receiving address" also 0?
https:// www.nanode.co/account/xrb_31337cwbxe6and3zo68qn4p1aeb94hz38eyctsaxib6tsp4awrux8ieod59o

>actually believing it's an overflow bug

Someone is thinking they can hide their earlier scam activity by flooding the ledger with 0 entries. What they do not realize is that the Nano team can unlock these to show more transactions and that by doing this, its only highlighting these fraudulent accounts even more.

Further investigation;
https:// github.com/clemahieu/raiblocks/commit/c42d669769692ddacfca38ef4d5153b8d94de1b4
https:// github.com/clemahieu/raiblocks/pull/603
https:// github.com/clemahieu/raiblocks/issues/602
Kinda looks like these transactions segfault nodes, so this is actually an attack? Doesn't seem at all like a double spend. Either way, they pushed a fix three hours ago to address exactly this zero transaction issue that you can see at the top there.

I'm not believing anything until the math works out. As far as I can see it's just a segfault provocation from a bad hash validation being exploited to attack nodes.
It sure does seem like someone is trying to push this down hard to buy up as much as they can cheap.

Bitgrail's owner is really fucked. He's doing whatever he can to deflect to the devs. You can tell from bots that post the same thread over and over and the paid FUD on here. Like legit the FUD is low quality. Not even discussing the coin, just really silly comments and shit.

All this FUD I'm seeing about XRB makes me want to buy some.

It does appear to be this desu, but it could also be a clever campaign by someone to get us to buy their bags by appearing to be low quality fud spewed en masse when it actually makes a sidelong reference to real problems.

Careful, this is god-tier FUD, this coin is going down a lot further first

Remember /pol/ has come in here so it could easily be 1 guy manipulating dozens of brainlets into repeating what he says.

Binance Rep only has 9.2 Million Nano, two heavy dumps already about one million each on NANOBTC @ Binance. Can indeed happen a few more times though.

Yeah, the amount of muh BTC braindead fuckwits around here these days that will parrot anything that makes the BTC price go up makes this worryingly possible.

>https:// github.com/clemahieu/raiblocks/pull/603

"Also, now that I think about it, there's still a possible race condition with elections, where a block can be removed from the ledger. Fixing that will be much harder."

>BLOCK CAN BE REMOVED FROM THE LEDGER

That's _literally_ double spending.

They aren't actually zero transactions. They are just transactions with very low amounts of NANO.

Elections in Nano are equivalent to mining in a traditional blockchain, so that observation boils down to "If you could withhold blocks you could double spend". Well, yes, but you need control of the mining power to do it in a blockchain, or the representatives in Nano.
That said, given the distribution of Nano is all fucked up due to the whole Bitgrail fiasco, it's not worth discounting that entirely, and proof of stake is still not a proven concept in a large market cap coin, period, so there may be something to this.

Do you have a single fact to back that up?

S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S

that explorer is garbage
nanowat.ch/account/xrb_1btcfoodhhw3arbpw1rnq1jzgetcue9askzfar947ry5dtqsyhnk6f8tuc3g

Zero transactions are not possible for Nano. Check the whitepaper. These transactions are just extremely small and the explorer rounds it up to zero.

NANO is extremely divisible and there is no point showing dozens of places after comma on the explorer.
github.com/clemahieu/raiblocks/wiki/Distribution,-Mining-and-Units

Yeah this is what it was as the nanowat.ch explorer makes obvious. What that explorer also makes obvious though is that no amount is being fabricated or accrued anywhere, it's just a bunch of accounts all passing tiny amounts between each other to make it look like zero length transactions in the explorer with insufficient precision to show the lower denominations in those transactions.

These inputs there at github have nothing to do with zero transactions. Zero transactions can't be done in NANO.

Pretty faggoty of you to spread FUD like that.

But it seems you got rekt already. Some user proved that the transactions aren't actually zero.

Yes, does indeed appear to be unrelated, it was purely on the basis of the is_zero call in the code and the coincidental appearance of the pseudo-zeroes in the blockchain explorer with inadequate precision that drew me to that false conclusion. That race condition appears to be something else entirely.

WTF?? More FUD?

DAG based coins can send 0 value txns. Even IOTA can do that

This is some shit grade FUD from people who do not understant shit.

Kucoin issue is resolved and it was a kucoin error that they sent coins when someone was not confirming the first email and tried to withdraw twice

IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH NANO, but an exchange bug

And its not even a zero value txn

nanowat.ch/account/xrb_1btcfoodhhw3arbpw1rnq1jzgetcue9askzfar947ry5dtqsyhnk6f8tuc3g

Its 0.00000000004126750779 NANO

For the record we should make it clear you actually *can't* send zero value transactions, just try it with the wallet to verify this. Doesn't work at all.

reddit.com/r/bitgrail/comments/7wi75w/how_francesco_firano_killed_nano/

FUCK FRANCESCO FIRANO AND FUCK ZACK SHAPIRO THE KIKE DEV

...