There hasn't really been a huge pump, so i'm not expecting a dump to happen either. Perhaps just a small dump

I can't believe people still eat this kids shit up.

he's probably the greatest LARPER on this board, but a LARPER nonetheless.

Apologies for the spelling errors, I haven't had much sleep, had to fly on a red-eye.

Most people here are idiots you know

you seem more and more credible to me by the way you talk and the words that you use. Not because of you shilling link. You talk like you have the mindset of one of them. And this is why im pretty much going all in on link then ehtirum.

So the people that matter are only taking ethereum seriously and none of the so-called eth killers?

>pastebin.com/nXwZzDi2
NOOOOOO
MY LINKKKKKKKKK
THEY'RE ALL GONE AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Great call on this weeks accumulation
Thoughts on yesterday's pump?

tl;dr

Correct, you see this is all a new revolutionary paradigm to the hoi poloi, but 'disruptive' technology is not as disruptive as it's marketed. It all plays out rather predictably for the serious money, granted crypto has taken them for a bigger turn than most new technologies (they don't even try to hide this anymore) but the general thought it: establish the most suitable infrastructure candidate first and foremost, acquire control of this, then start developing and investing in 'products'. Ethereum is the only thing that can be likened to 'infrastructure' right now, and legacy investors are going to focus mostly on that and then things that are actual services/products. ChainLINK would also fall into the category of infrastructure.

well theres more money to be made with eth. It's cheaper so they can scoop up more.

I read someplace to that vitalik was given money from peter thiel l to. So essential its pretty much been controlled from the start and the fact the plebs got a piece of it makes them nervous

>legacy corporations
what do you mean by this exactly?

What is this shit dumping at and when is all I want to know. It's been stuck around the same price for about 24 hours now. Somewhat annoying.

oh and this is why they hate btc too i'd assume right?

becasue some guy or guys made it

A few weeks ago you said this document was 1 of 2 documents that confirmed that SWIFT is actually pushing for an open banking inititiative and explicitly states that they want to achieve this via “community driven decentralised networks”

swiftinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/SIWP-2016-001-Impact-Open-APIs-FINAL.pdf

What was that second document? I don't think anyone has found it yet.

when is link reaching a million

god dam. Hes dropping more important shit then link going to 1 milly

and what i already read it, stuff that people already knew if they were smart, dumb AB worshipper

This user is asking the right questions. Written by the same guy as the one you linked.

swiftinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Markos-Pinar-Damian-Open-APIs.pdf

Slides 7-9 are particularly important.

And this isn't even everything but the other documents are not publicly available on the internet.

What's happening with permissioned blockchains? SWIFT itself ran the poc on hyperledger, and project ubin (rumors about chainlink implementation) seemed to test Quorum, corda, and hyperledger. Will they really say fuck it them and use a public blockchain?

TY AB As always a pleasure

They will absolutely not use a public blockchain, the LINK token is built on Ethereum which acts as a contract administrator to ensure node payments, the LINK Node NETWORK itself will handle datat processing and will do so for public and private blockchains. This is clear to anyone who has read the whitepaper or even understands what the point of ERC20 is, stop thinking that the token is the product, it's the deed to the product, the product is the network.

we.trade (formerly digital trade chain consortium) is also launching their test product in february allegedly, any truth to that being a chainlink implementation? Project ubin phase 3 is happening this quarter and it's running tests on Singapore Exchange bond payments.

Doubt it. That's why I think AB is a LARPer. HyperLedger is being worked on by a multitude of corporations. I doubt they will ever actually use Ethereum. HyperLedger is built FROM Ethereum. Why use the public chain when you can just use the private chain instead and not deal with those "mined Bitcoin a decade ago" millionaires? He's definitely a LARPer.

So BLZ, RLC, STORJ fall into infrastructure as well?

a few threads back you said you had "leaked" chainlink documents on your laptop you intended to share. when do you plan on posting them?

>posts literally days before the huge crash saying big institutional.money is going to pump the price up
>no word from him for weeks while everything goes to shit
>suddenly reapears when everything is nice and calm and the market is pumping
>Insider here ! P-please believe me
yeah fuck off

I don't mean for chainlink itself I was just asking about the future of smart contract deployment and the potential future value of ether. Would they choose ethereum or permissioned blockchains was the question really. You seem to see a lot of stuff saying corporations don't find a public blockchain suitable for their use because of privacy issues.

Are you retarded, he posted to tell us that there would be a crash, baka.

I posted right before ChainLINK increased saying it would increase that same week. Also right before the crash I told everyone to get out of any shitcoins, I didn't know the extent of the crash, no one can predict that, but any anons who followed my advice saved and made a lot of money. Not that past performance is a future indicator, always DYOR but don't spread baseless accusations in my threads.

Also another document some anons should go through for clues:

www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_future__of_financial_services.pdf

Notice the guy who works for SWIFT as well, he'll be important later.

That was really my question but I think he misunderstood.

>new revolutionary paradigm

Seriously shut up or kill yourself
He told us the exact mechanism of the crash and when those accounts being held would then be opened
If you were literate in English you could have realistically timed the market for the last few months off AB posts

Why do you even live?

do you think chian link will dump a little after the talks?

Because corporations see Ethereum as the legislative branch of the growing data economy. See the nature of legislation is that it is decentralised, or must at least partially be, your question is sort of like saying 'why would corporations donate to presidential campaigns instead of just forcing their own president on the American people', Ethereum derives its value from being public and decentralised. It's disruptive but legacy corporations have more to gain adapting and adopting than fighting. Fighting has never worked.

What about bitcoin? How deep are they in btc?

you're missing your trips AB

I wish I did. I didn't believe him until after the crash. There's no way he predicted the three predictions I've seen come true without inside knowledge. He's not LARPing.

Go put more XMR on you're trezor faggot. You're completely full of shit but it doesn't matter either way really, you won't have any effect on its success/failure. Go home.

etherium is the one ring basically

>but legacy corporations have more to gain adapting and adopting than fighting.
Ah okay, that's sort of what i've been tumbling over in my head. Whether they'd shoehorn what they've been doing into permissioned blockchains as long as they could or if a real revolution would happen. We had a bitcoin frenzy this winter, we'll have an ethereum frenzy as the mainstream media begins focusing on what it means for society in the coming months I think. After they've accumulated I'm sure.

>I asked about ChainLINK

To the trash it goes

Don't know. Also Hyperledger will see growth and adoption, but there must be a point of interface between Hyperledger and Ethereum, because there is no value in a truly centralised ledger precisely because blockchain ledgers are actually extremely inefficient. If they were revolutionary technology they would have been adopted two decades ago, the entire point of blockchain is it is community driven and decentralised. If you do even a little bit of digging into bank research this has been a hot topic for literally several years. You are blinded by this cynical assumption that they'll never co-operate with a bunch of 'loser' early adopter NEETs, etc. but this is facile reasoning. It's a bit like saying corporations will make their own private internet and they would never allow for a bunch of losers to have access to all the media in the world and for university students to program websites and become billionaires. Then in retrospect it all seems so inevitable.

Change is the only constant.

Link will never be over $10 despite what assblaster says. Screencap this.

He won't. He's fucking LARPing hard man. I can't believe people fall for this shit. Is everyone in here a fucking teenager?

Sure, AB could be working in the financial industry. But so far his love to ChainLink doesn't come from it's popularity in that industry but because he PERSONALLY thinks it's a good investment. That's it. So far he has mentioned he talked to two people about ChainLink and none of them have a clue about it according to him.

Then we also uncovered IBM papers talking about Oracles and they never once mention ChainLink.

Then we found out that the ChainLink contract between Sony AXA was actually a test done in a hackathon by Sergey and it has nothing to do with Sony and AXA.

So really, the only connection to the financial industry I see is the SWIFT PoC. But just because they did a PoC it doesn't mean it will really be used. In fact, the IBM papers tells us they're building an in house oracle.

Then you have SmartContract.com front page saying they're working directly with SWIFT to create their own "Smart Oracles".

Then you have SWIFT gpi releasing this quarter. How can SWIFT be really using ChainLink if the actual full main net of ChainLink won't be live until later this year or early next year? It's obvious that swift is not going to use ChainLink from all those hints.

ChainLink is not trash though. I myself own 60k LINKs because I know it's functionality is beyond SWIFT. But seriously, AB is a LARPer. Literally every he comes on there is a pump followed by a dump. IMO he could be from a circle of pump and dumpers and they're fooling everyone on Veeky Forums because of it. I know it's hard to admit but that's the reality. And unlike plebbit harsh truth are always realized here.

Anyone who believes this closet homosexual named AssBlaster is a complete retard.

Hi AB, what do you think about the unilever "insider"? Eventually he rick rolled everyone and never posted the PDF.

Link: archived.moe/biz/thread/S7589929

biz is a magical fucking place
there have been insiders with years of trading knowledge giving tips worth thousands of dollars on an almost daily basis
half of the responses are FUK U WHICH WAY TA SEZ BTC GO?!?!?!?
fucking. delicious.

This. He's a larper from discord that's made some lucky guesses and also reinforced some common sense shit about the token

Is there any news on the state of chainlink? Are more firms and data providers committing to setting up nodes and selling APIs to node operators? Is there more evidence than last time you were here that Sergey has been succsful with finding data providers and smart contract writers for launch? Several of the larpers have seemed to focus on that aspect, Swisscom in particular is supposed to have been busy.

i dont know what to ask you but i thanks for being here. IS there anything we should be asking or you want to say that we are missing?

>Then we found out that the ChainLink contract between Sony AXA was actually a test done in a hackathon by Sergey and it has nothing to do with Sony and AXA.

very interested in a source for this

Seriously AB? You're using WEF as an example to back ChainLink?? WEF is literally working directly with Ripple. Wtf are you on about?!??

>Then we also uncovered IBM papers talking about Oracles and they never once mention ChainLink.
this is literally certifiably false my friend. Everyone disregard this post because he's arguing in bad faith, regardless of what you think of AB.

It sounds like we'll be hitting 10k Ethereum at some point based on what you're saying. Is that accurate, or am I thinking too big or small?

XMR may be a bit different since there's a reason for it to work as the currency itself inside its own network.

Thanks!

Should I sell my stake in chain link now and buy back in after the conference?

I believe skepticism is healthy and you honestly shouldn't trust anything I say because you want it to be true, nor anyones. Instead evaluate what I say based on it's intuitive logic and the leads I present based on what the content of those leads are.

Follow people more than terms. I see too many people looking through documents for the exact word 'ChainLINK' instead look for names popping up across documents. This is a much harder web to untangle but it yields better answers.

WEF is a forum where many ideas and developments are discussed and exchanged, I'm telling you to try and piece together a picture several years in the making, look for trends and terms and people across industries. Not to even mention Ripple and ChainLINK aren't actually competitors.

What's your estimated cut of smart contract value for the chainlink network? If you're writing a smart contract for 1 million and using the chainlink network, what percentage of that is being paid out to the network? 1%? .1%?

>Not to even mention Ripple and ChainLINK

just diffrent peices to the same puzzle?

and again thank you for your time. Even if you are shit posting.

Ripple and Chainlink do two completely different things. Don't see how they're related.
What's your opinion on the interledger project?

>That is why Sergey has been working so hard and communicating so little, there is a very real race against the clock right now, if LINK successfully deploys a fundamentally useable product, it’s not only going to cement itself and increase in price, it is literally going to suck the life and value out of every vapourware ERC20 out there. It is interesting, and surely no coincidence, that the deployment timeline for LINK is right on schedule for the entrance of legacy corporations.

This is fucking intense. Are we effectively on a make-or-break path now?

>Follow people more than terms. I see too many people looking through documents for the exact word 'ChainLINK' instead look for names popping up across documents. This is a much harder web to untangle but it yields better answers.

Also, anons are starting to dig into any potential persons/people involved, but this looks very speculative:
>Guys. I have provided pieces of a larger puzzle. I ask that you respect these peoples privacy while at the same time figure out how involved they are with link.
>Is there another project that has so many large company / dev connections with 0 communication? WHY? The answer should come 3/20

Looks like it could a lot of wild goose-chasing
But is there any clues by doing this: >PDFS (cloudstorage) and docusign will play a huge role in smart contracts.

Are we looking in the right places, or do we need to go back to square one?

Are there any factors in your opinion that could cause Link to fail either before or after mainnet launch?

I'm so happy with my linkies

>but you always had the resolve and fortitude to not sell at 1/10/100 USD
Well I was in a hospital for several months and my gf left me and during that time I just forgot about ETH. I would have sold it ALL at 10-100 USD. Guess getting into a car accident was the luckiest moment of my life. I do not even know what to do now. Should I just market sell it all and crash the ship with no survivors? Nah. If what you say is true, I want to be important with all my ETH. They can come to me and ask nicely.

nvm im an idoit.

Been accumulating for months :)

How is this false? Prove it! I've read through the entire thread when it was happening. I've read through ever link that was posted that day. And literally there was ZERO mention of ChainLink even though they were talking abiut Oracles and the sentiment that I got from the papers is that they are working on an in house oracle.

If you think I'm lying, then prove to that ChainLink was actually mentioned in those papers. Go ahead. Post a screenshot. Post a link. Show me. But you won't because you can't.

I'm invested in ChainLink myself. Im all in. But there is a huge fetish here over finding new information about ChainLink since there is never news. Veeky Forums is essentially hallucinating at this point trying to see "hints" everywhere when there are none.

Docusign will be huge, don't know about PDFS, but perhaps the biggest source of clues is PSD2, start reading through documents planning and discussing PSD2 and look for names and then try to trace them back to LINK. I'm not trying to be deliberately vague, it's just I know of a few very specific examples that I absolutely cannot divulge, but I suspect there are more.

Mr. Assblaster, is it Tokia exchange?

yeah i was curous about this too. I think the ico closed so you should be good to talk abou tit right

yes go all in sir very good exchange sir

...

Anyone who isn't retarded knows it's Coinmetro

What is this. Why are there different fonts (calibri and helvetica) and also a typo right in the first word. No way this is some corporate document. This is embarassing.

It was Globitex. The ICO is closed, the tokens aren't for sale and the subreddit is full of literal pajeets

That document is false and anyone who fell for it is a retard, the cons don't even make sense. That does not mean IBM isn't involved with ChainLINK, however if you're looking at IBM as a sign of value, don't. They have serious cashflow issues and the corporation is basically whoring itself out to any remotely new tech to excite investors. This is why Stellar Lumens got blown out despite the IBM 'connections'.

For the lazy linkies, this is the SWIFT employee acknowledged in the weforum pdf.

Thank you based AssBlaster

Good LARP you fucking weirdo

I know you cant possible know the EOY price for link but im just wondering what you think is possible?

Alright thanks, we really need to start discussing PSD2 and the documents more. There were only a handful of such threads in the past two weeks. Telegram groups and even LINKTrader and the slack is becoming easier to discuss shit.
What is this pronounced FUD and derailing that we're seeing now? It can't just be bagholders and trolls, can it? Are we seeing literal psyops happening here, or has this board just become more shit. Anyways, let me know if you guys wanna discuss this shit on the telegram groups or slack.

I didnt ask for your opinion, bro. Was talking to OP

i def do but i dont hace acces to either. Im a NEET. This has been the highlight of my life the past year.

I actually think there are so many people trying to buy the dip after the conference that the price might actually never dip. Remember SIBOS? That time everybody expected the price to soar and it dumped. Now it's the other way around.

Are these people afraid that they are going to be left behind by technology ? Are they afraid they will be replaced by programmers in the long therm ?

Why are you guys so eager to fight it out about ChainLink? If you like the coin, invest. If not, dont. Why are you arguing like retarded children. All you say does not matter anyway

this is old news there have been enough people already turned on it that so far it doesn't get much more concrete than the sort of stuff assblaster just posted and I doubt there's a smoking gun out there or it would have been outed. Even the swift institute open api document was known if not discussed that much before it got shared in the assblaster thread. At this point all we can do is wait for something new to come out.

0x32cfA4420cc04A54e06e103474Cb3AB1Dc5ccc6f

1 ETH FOR THE TRUTH!!

>I met with a certain Swiss banker of a Dutch background
>google
> Friedrich Gutmann

That niggas been dead for like 70 year you retard.

Y'all should dump this fucken LINK as soon as y'all can or y'all are gonna get y'all's AssBLASTED haha

why has no one called out this isn't the real AB. this is coordinated as fuck