REQ

What is a realistic price for EOY?

$5?

Impossible to tell. But expect this by summer:

Daily reminder

REQ is going to use LINK's oracles. There is no point in holding REQ over LINK right now.

LINK has to be adopted and moon before REQ can be adopted and moon.

$100

crypto.youcollect.co/#/marketplace/request-network

Both will moon; adopt both

You understand both REQ and KNC are planning to use LINK's oracles?

Investing in REQ is like investing in KIA.

Investing in LINK is like investing in oil.

REQ doesn't depend on LINK. It's not like they're waiting for LINK to finish their product before rolling out REQ.

REQ has a broader use-case (e-commerce). LINK is more like financial infrastructure.

REQ is only releasing the crypto management part Q1.

The fiat part is planned to deploy AFTER Link's mainnet release. This is not a coincidence.

How is REQ going to handle fiat liquidity, by the way?

REQ cannot function without LINK

If you believe this you don't understand what LINK does.

LINK will allow any 3rd party data on smart-contracts. REQ using LINK's oracles to convert fiat is just one potential use case. (Theoretically there could be thousands).

Though Kyber's DEX and liquidity pool, I believe.

You don't have to sell me on the concept behind LINK, but I think their team is small and weak, and there are bigger players lurking.

I'm not trying to sell you. I'm trying to make you understand holding REQ is over LINK is stupid because LINK literally has to be adopted and moon first.

They're using LINK. It's the number one solution on the page, and we got confirmation yesterday LINK is nearly finished ahead of schedule. Hence the LINK mini moon yesterday.

Kyber handles fiat? Interdasting, gotta read the whitepaper.

LINK doesn't provide fiat liquidity.

will it go lower? I have like 200 REQ I got at the bottom of the last crash, but now that I actually checked the coin in more detail it seems worth putting alot more. I want to get the best out of it tho

120K REQ at .04. Fucking best purchase ever.

>open kyber whitepaper
>ctrl+f "fiat"
>0 results

No. See my comment below.

No. Only ETH tokens.

REQ is using LINK for fiat.

You'll do well buying before the main net release, no matter the price.

Does not answer my question, brainlet.

Only have 5k REQ

Still hopeful

Sorry lad, Kyber is crypto-crypto conversions only. I guess an Oracle will be needed for fiat, so LINK is the obvious choice.

Might be $25k EOY user.

I answered your question as clear as possible.

Are you retarded?

There ya go. Dubs 88.

You know what that means... the prophecy is real.

How does LINK handle fiat liquidity, brianlet? Describe the process step by step, you brain dead moron.

You think it's worth selling omg for req? I've held both but prefer req, as it could work with other block chains. Is omg just for Eth?

Considering they have Vitalik's dick up their esophagus, yes, I'd say OMG is for ETH only.

OMG is one of the most over-valued projects in all of crypto. I think they made some very ambitious promises and they will not be able to deliver. Their Github is *crickets*, they've already postponed their prototype launch, and at 1.5 billion market cap, I think everything that they promised is already priced in.

Basically boils down to this: what has the higher upside:

A 1.5 billion White Paper project with no code yet and a heavy reliance on Plasma network which appears in chaos, and is based in Thailand known for fraud, prostitution and corruption and with signs that they lied about the credentials of their core team.

A 200 million White Paper with a working prototype, timely updates, 100% delivery on every promise so far, made by conscientious White Europeans, and based in Berlin, an area of the world known for almost no corruption and innovation.

This. I'd maybe consider OMG a cautious buy at

Just bought some REQ. Feels good being a millionaire soon.

Yeah, would like to know as well. Not too technical on LINK.

Said. And checkd.

That's because it doesn't. LINK 'only' handles the oracle. The pajeet with purple ID went suddenly silent.. hmm

Guaranteed most of you faggots haven't read this shitcoins technical paper (or have the brain to understand this and see if it even is a viable solution to the problem it lays out)

Fucking retarded neets

REQ doesn't need LINK you fucking stupid cunt. LINK is just one available option for them, and that's assuming that Sergey actually gets his fat ass into gear and makes LINK operational.

So really, LINK depends more on REQ. REQ is actually trying to be nice and seems to be showing some sympathy for stinky linkies but LINK really has to step up their game or REQ will lose patience and move on.

Thanks, just sold 100k.

uh it seemed vague enough that it is probably viable? tell us about it senpai

It is shift change time in Lahore and Rajesh just finished after a 20 hour fud shift whereby he earned $1. Give him a break.

Nigga.

I have shit to do other than help random ass people get rich.

The entire purpose of LINK is to allow 3rd party data on the block chain.

FIAT information is 3rd party data.

Right now REQ can only do tokens because tokens are already blockchain data.

I can't make this more clear than this. It's also pitiful none of you have zero idea what LINK and REQ are or how they work.

literally no one is accumulating
thats why its been bleeding out since the ATH

Still didn't answer my question. Nice try, pranjesh. Fuck off to red*it.

Holy fuck it's retarded.

link will have lots of oracle competitors in the future while request is built to have the lowest possible fees to deter competition

>can't even reply properly
>red*it spacing
>is retarded

ok, so REQ will moon when Mainnet come out? when is that supposed to happen? its at like 30 something cents right now, go in or sit out?

>fiat liquidity
a paypal like app will need to be built that holds fiat.
that project will most likely be backed by a bank

honestly I wouldnt hold my breath unless a legit bank seriously wants to get in the crypto game

Depends what you want. If you want a lambo then you should go in now.

yeah i totally want a lambo

This is basically what I thought. That's concerning.

They have a partnership with ING that they cant announce.

why would it have to be backed by a bank

>So really, LINK depends more on REQ. REQ is actually trying to be nice and seems to be showing some sympathy for stinky linkies but LINK really has to step up their game or REQ will lose patience and move on.
this is retarded. neither is contingent apon the other because neither exist yet in full functionality. If all goes according to plan, they would equally support each other's use cases.

Damn, you're gonna be a millionaire in a couple months.

Ah, thanks. I completely forgot about that one. They basically did announce it, but IGN asked them to remove their logo because, as I extrapolated, of unclear ICO regulations in EU. Or something along those lines, anyway.

Cant tell how far the omg fud is stretching tho

Dang, some of you guys are making my stack look like nothing.

50k Req right here.

>that project will most likely be backed by a bank
it would most likely use a 3rd party for initial fiat transactions, whixc means fees on top of fees. Technically it could still be useful without fiat, but I'm selling this shit as soon as i can get my roi back anyway. regrets.

Yes, legal reasons from the bank.

I think a lot of people forget about the ING thing.

Fiat vs no fiat boils down to $100 vs $10 REQ. I'm honestly fine with either scenario.

the money has to come from somewhere
I suppose it could be VC backed but a bank would be the cheapest option in terms of fees
definitely fiat fees comparable to paypal at first. request can still be extremely profitable with bitcoin/eth/token payments though

You don't *need* a *decentralized* oracle to handle Kyber's fiat liquidity user... Oracles already exist, LINK is only making them decentralized
This aspect of LINK is only a must for big players none if which will adopt REQ on release.

I'm bullish AF on LINK, but don't get confused, and remember this market is all about hype, and like another user said, REQ use case is easier to grasp by normies, I fully expect REQ to pull a TRX before LINK hits singularity, then I'll sell some for the other
>still holding a healthy amount of stinkies mind you, I'm no prophet

>easier to grasp by normies
I'm betting on this as well.
>I fully expect REQ to pull a TRX before LINK hits singularity, then I'll sell some for the other
This is basically my plan. I didn't expect LINK to moon so early though, much less a week after I sold 6k stinkies for REQ. Holding 10k stinkies, let's see if the prophecy is fulfilled.

>Kyber's fiat liquidity
what are you considering fiat liquidity?
kyber can only deal with USDT at best

800 REQfag here, lets hope

absolutely retarded lmao

80/20
LINK/REQ good, lads?

they can use another oracle
iExec is partnered with REQ and has oracle codes in their github

Those are all legitimate points. I challenge you to defend the valuation of OMG token.

Just like the
Prophecy?

Lad, try to get at least 5,000 REQ.

If it goes big, you want to at least have a six digit dollar balance.

2k req
3k link
how do I look

There's at least two anons one with 400K and the other 500K. One cunt also flashed 700K briefly. They held even when it was $1.25

That's fucking hard. I only have 2k in my portfolio.

I have seen people on here with over 1 mil REQ on their binance

Wagecuck harder or trade your way up lad, no other way.

Bastards.

I have 13k in savings but too pussy to put it into coins.
Fuck my TSP and IRA too right.

I work an extra Saturday job in sales, which go strictly to my crypto stack.

that's my ratio right now. but it is like this because i have a lot of faith in link.