>There is a 12 percent chance of a super solar storm the size of the Carrington event hitting Earth in the next 10 years, according to physicist Pete Riley, who published a paper in the journal Space Weather earlier this year on the topic. phys.org/news/2014-07-earth-survived-near-miss-solar-storm.html
It would be bad if it hit something like a nuclear power plant.
I've lived through hurricanes and the proceeding two weeks of no electricity.
I think people are frightened by this because the electrical grid will be down where the CME hits hardest. If you are really worried, just keep extra food, water and some way to boil water with gas or propane.
Isaac Rogers
>"..big enough to "knock modern civilization back to the 18th century," NASA said. That's a euphemism because they conceal the existence of nuclear installations. A few will fukushima within a week and not a single one will survive going 'island' for more than a month.
Easton Scott
How much you want to bet they actually have contingency plans for such things to prevent meltdown?
Brayden Cook
CMEs have do not affect nuclear power plants.
Jacob Hughes
No, they have a probabilistic risk assessment. Such a scenario is excluded because there is no possible remedy with current designs. The only contingency plan is the Nationwide Sacrifice Zone. Self-calming illusions based on technical ignorance do not help here.
Joshua Wright
If you're so sure how do they affect nuclear plants?
The 12% number was for the sizes equal to and larger than the carrington event. The "superflares" only would obviously be rarer. Not even sure what you're trying to say with that statement.
Nolan Green
only god knows how many cables are in a nuclear plant
point is that they don't have a clue about how big, when, why, and what will be the damage they are good at random numbers and muh chances 12% means 88% that nothing happen, so they'll call it a victory of their prediction? bullshit but muh rings told me... bullshit record 3 superflares with modern instruments, than we talk numbers
Tyler King
If you're going to be a fucking retard and not read any of the sources linked, just leave the thread.
Landon Ortiz
CMEs don't just melt all cables. A geomagnetic storm induces currents in huge conductors like power grids, telegraph wires and pipelines. Small electronics like the wiring in a nuclear plant are not affected because they don't enclose much magnetic flux. Unless they are in space nuclear plants will be fine. The only problems that may occur are loss of mains electricity for which they have generators to run the cooling after the reactor has been shut down.
As suspected you don't know what you're talking about. Please take your ignorant scaremongering elsewhere.
Logan Thomas
I'm sure if the experts with PhD in NASA and some other countries would take it seriously and take measures if they thought this was a noteworthy threat.
Nathaniel Williams
The problem is to do anything about it you would need massive upgrades in the electric infrastructure, and the power companies are lobbying heavily against that to save money, and since politicians are mostly retards, nothing is being done.
Jeremiah Cox
>CMEs have do not affect nuclear power plants. All nuke plants need electricity to operate without melting down. Coolant pumps, control rod actuators, tons of sensor and control systems. I HOPE there's enough of a Faraday cage design to keep most things safe. But the basic problem at Chernobyl began with a simulated power outage. [shitstorm incoming]
Christopher Foster
They have back up generators.
Mason Scott
which will probably fail
Robert Jackson
so did Fukushima
Leo Russell
Because they flooded. Geomagnetic storms don't cause tsunamis and lessons have been learnt.
Generators and small equipment are unaffected. Please don't talk out your ass.