Starting classes >Engineering: Rigor:8 Sociability:5 Bullshit Endurance:10 Job Security:10 Income:7 Versatility:5 Knowledgeability:8 Prestige:9 Luck:8 May advance in company position as an officer or businessman, but will likely become a project manager; more likely to end dead end as a senior engineer
>Physics: Rigor:10 Sociability:3 Bullshit Endurance:8 Job Security:6 Income:5 Versatility:8 Knowledgeability:10 Prestige:10 Luck:8 May end in suicide, Michio Kaku if lucky, or rarely form a new and practical idea
>Computer Science Rigor:4 Sociability:8 Bullshit Endurance:6 Job Security:2 Income:10 Versatility:10 Knowledgeability:6 Prestige:8 Luck:8 May advance into company officer positions/tech advisor, advocate, consultant, etc
Engineering is hard, but it is certainly not rigorous.
Gabriel Brown
>Update >Engineering: Luck:2 >Physics: Luck:1
Asher Stewart
>Mathematics: Rigor:10 Sociability:1 Bullshit Endurance:0 Job Security:0 Income:0 Versatility:0 Knowledgeability:10 Prestige:11 Luck:8 Any job ever with a substantial sum of dosh
Charles Nelson
> physics > Rigor: 10
Pick one, pal
Jonathan Howard
Starting classes >Gender Studies: Rigor:0 Sociability:8 Bullshit Endurance:10 Job Security:0 Income:0 Versatility:2 Knowledgeability:0 Prestige:0 Luck:10 May end up as top burger flipper at a famous american franchise company
Adam Evans
unemployed math/physics fag spotted
John Clark
>Job Security:10 Fucking kek.
Colton Edwards
>implying you don't have to be a faggot or working at the most obscure engineering form. Of course this doesn't apply for shit like Nuke Engy/Geo Engy where there are only three jobs
>Math Autism: 11 Rigor: Nigga it's math Job Security: -2
Alexander Ross
physics Rigor: lel were in the 7th dimension tho :^) Job security: I can always work at Starbucks Insecurity: hey don't make fun of science :^(
Landon Allen
All of my friends were going into the medical field. Keep kidding yourself
Asher Lopez
>>Physics: >Rigor:10 >Sociability:3 >Bullshit Endurance:8 >Job Security:6 >Income:5 >Versatility:8 >Knowledgeability:10 >Prestige:10 >Luck:8 >May end in suicide, Michio Kaku if lucky, or rarely form a new and practical idea
Physicist with PhD here. Your parameters are way off.
Job Security: 10 (We are trying to recruit people but it is hard to find people. Laws of nature is the same all over the globe so you can het a job many places. I did a couple of years in Japan.)
Income: 9 (Salary in research is dire of course but your career can change a lot. After academic research I did a fellowship (not too bad pay), electronics designer (rather good), programming (well paid but that involved insane amounts of overtime) and now consultant (partner status))
Versatility: 10 (or 11 even. I have moved effortlessly between physics, electronics, software and IPR.)
(I think I'll do an AMA this weekend)
Nolan Hill
>going into
Jaxson Bailey
We're talking bachelor's pham. A PhD in comp sci or engineering could fare just as well as you did perhaps better.
OP is a physics major. This isn't unbiased and therefore not worth taking seriously.
/thread
Joshua Rodriguez
>CompSci
>Rigor: 4
Only for codeniggers, a serious CS major need to take it to 10. Unfortunelly the majority is just braindead codeniggers, that's why you see stupid undergrad errors on big names of the industry.
