Male and Female IQ

>Males are no smarter than females!

When will this meme die?

>Most IQ tests are constructed so that there are no overall score differences between females and males.[7][121] Popular IQ batteries such as the WAIS and the WISC-R are also constructed in order to eliminate sex differences.[122] In a paper presented at the International Society for Intelligence Research in 2002, it was pointed out that because test constructors and the Educational Testing Service (which developed the SAT) often eliminate items showing marked sex differences in order to reduce the perception of bias, the "true sex" difference is masked. Items like the MRT and RT tests, which show a male advantage in IQ, are often removed.

Other urls found in this thread:

sciencevsfeminism.com/the-myth-of-equality/sex-differences-general-intelligence/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disparate_impact
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Do they do this with different races too?

Yes you are bright.
it is natural for men like you to crave the validation of their existence and get depressed if they fail to feel relevant, responsible.
The best way for a man to cater his need for approval is to serve some woman (and some of her children) through emotional&financial support.
Men are pleased to contribute to someone else life, to support their family.

Why women are a good way to feel relevant? Because women love to be provided for and each woman will always find a man ready to please her.
[for most men, the best feeling of feeling real is when the girl moans from your cock in her pussy]

THe problem for men is that they are disposable in the eyes of each woman, since all men wish to serve the few women who talk to them.
Men must thus invent several ways to please women, invention and creativity which strengthen their feeling of being worthy, relevant, in touch with reality.
Men are too impotent to find other way to feel real.
Once that the a woman replaces a man by another provider, the man gets very upset and depressed.
THis leads men to think that they are better than women, stronger, smarter and that they must built a life outside women. Some men manage to indeed built an empire, but they will always loos it for some women.
Women give meaning to men and betas, no matter how successful outside women, will always give up everything for some relationship with some woman who claim to fancy them.

males control the world and females control males.

is this really a surprise? just look at chess, there's literally no conceivable reason for why a board-game should be gender split, but it is, and ELO ratings clearly show a massive skill gap

In this perspective, what's a relevant way to act or goal to work towards?

population sizes

there are far, far more males that play chess competitively and so naturally they have the more outliers

I'd assume they would if they could figure out a way to.

>the "true sex" difference is masked. Items like the MRT and RT tests, which show a male advantage in IQ, are often removed


Wait wait... Am I deeply stupid or did I just read that just because a certain part of the test is performed better by men than women its removed because the results would be sexist?

Why... why? What about the other way around?

Why are people who believe shit like this always illiterate retards? (rhetorical question)

Not even good copypasta.

It's also true that there are more men at the high (and low) extremes of IQ than females, so competition in a game like chess is obviously going to be tougher among men.

Detailed article on the topic: sciencevsfeminism.com/the-myth-of-equality/sex-differences-general-intelligence/

Get with the times.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disparate_impact

Difference in outcome is ipso facto proof of discrimination.

That doesn't have anything to do with intelligence testing, though.

It's a general social more put into legislation.

Do YOU want to lose your academic post for being sexist? Tim Hunt did.

That has nothing to do with the facts of the matter.

Sure it does. Researchers are not immune to social pressure and violating them has very nasty consequences for them.

Facts are still facts.

This is... madness, a pure form of statism where law becomes arbitrary but yet strict because it could someones feelings.

But still... I don't see the relationship with this, unless it falls under the interpretation that is just a sympton of our society but to say that you should have expanded a little more your post.

Facts can be cherry-picked.

The fact that men or women perform better at particular tests or questions is considered sufficient reason to exclude them (e.g. the cube analysis test where men score significantly better) from IQ testing and it has been so for decades. The lack of significant differences in IQ between sexes is an ASSUMPTION of the IQ model, not a conclusion based on IQ testing. Comparing sexes is simply outside the domain of IQ testing, because that factor is corrected for from the start.

But of course IQ tests still end up being cited as proof of the lack of differences in the variable which has been corrected for, because social scientists are sloppy and their fields highly politicised. This sort of circular reasoning and citation incest is par for the course in many fields in any case.

This is why IQ is a bad measure of general intelligence. See:

hey, thats great. still not going to hire you.

But it succeeds at what it was created for which is detecting various degrees of mental retardation.

Nice square brackets matey. Too bad they don't mean anything untill you add a source ;)

There is literally nothing on this planet a woman can do better than a man.

>In this perspective, what's a relevant way to act or goal to work towards?
MGTOW

>there are far, far more males that play chess competitively and so naturally they have the more outliers
>there are far, far more males that play chess competitively because they have the more outliers
FTFY

The artificial womb is coming.
The end of the ancestral parasite is at hand.
No more shall we succumb to the historical cycle of rise and fall.

Giving birth to the most children, largest period flow, biggest breasts...

I meant useful things.

Being promiscuous, illoyal, irresponsible, remorseless, egotistic, unempathetic, envious, entitled, ...

Should I go on?

>When will this meme die?
Never.