>"Mysterious bursts of energy coming from space align in a mathematical pattern, and so could be emanating from alien technology, according to scientists." >"All of the ten bursts that have been detected so far have dispersion measures that line up as multiples of a single number: 187.5. The chances of them doing so are 5 in 10,000" >While scientists have long considered that the bursts could be messages from aliens, the new finding could lend extra credence to that theory.
Oh yeah, because it's not like nature has ever produced mathematical patterns before. Yup, it's definitely gotta be aliens alright.
Justin Wood
I remember a few weeks ago you said you were going to stop making these threads. Also if this turns out to be legit you'd still be wrong, since you were basing your beliefs on shitty evidence, speaking of which:
>The chances of them doing so are 5 in 10,000
Nigga, that's fucking nothing.
Jose Richardson
> doesn't say which satellite dishes recieved the signal > doesn't say where it's heard from > doesn't say which star system or cluster the signal came from
seems legit...
Dominic Long
Spy sattelites confirmed!
>It could also be that the signals are not coming from space at all, but form much closer. The messages could be coming from a secret satellite that is hiding its messages so that they appear to come from much deeper in space.
Jeremiah Lopez
>independent >dailymail >not clickbait pick one
That said, this thread isn't even the article's fault as they even explained that "it could be" (as in a remote possibility) produced by ayys, it's you who said that it definitively is ayy lmaos. Kys.
Daniel Reed
Seriously trying to convert Veeky Forums to the cause, yes I've given up on that. This is just a bait thread because I'm bored. They said it came from another galaxy From another galaxy? Uh huh. How could it not be aliens? It's aliens.
Dylan Thompson
Also you spend wayyy too much time here.
Connor Sanchez
It's true, but I've got nothing to do until September.
Austin Cook
Revise.
Hudson Clark
>independent.co.uk >no source in sight >author appears to be a professional cock-slobbing clickbait whore
Well nigga, that explains it. OP sources tabloids as proof.
Jason Howard
>5 in 10,000
Josiah Long
You can only do so much revision mah nigga. Also I've been more interested in teaching myself some new shit, just this past couple of months I seem to have to "the wall".
Luis Sanders
You can always tell when gorilla is posting because he says the dumbest things possible.
Hey, gorrilla, "not confirmed" doesn't mean "proven" you fat retarded fuck.
It's good to take a break, waste time on Veeky Forums now then maybe August start to prepare yourself for September's material. Your brain will be nice and fresh. What has that one dish in Australia have to do with a decade long investigation on the other side of the world? Why do you dismiss this but believe in KIC?
Luis Gonzalez
They have put crystals into certain peoples eyes, somehow to harvest energy. There are parts of the EM spectrum off limits to some people also. Those CCTV cameras you see are also some form of projector/display, as is common glass.
We are being farmed for power.
Help is coming.
Aaron Jackson
> Researchers have been attempting to work out whether a message is encoded in the bursts — and it seems they might now have found one.
see name. Also, >5/10,000 Let's simplify that fraction >1/2,000 do you know how many fucking stars are in the milky way alone? We even have a testable hypothesis surrounding the wow signal now. Don't get your fucking panties shoved up your asshole until the data, which the article has yet to provide, has actually been peer reviewed and we can start hypothesizing.
Henry Peterson
AYYY
Gavin Powell
Wow, it's fucking nothing!
Jayden Martinez
Do you know how many alien civilizations are in the Milky Way alone?
Camden Ward
Currently all evidence points to there being none. This may need to be revised at a later date.
Kevin Perry
Unless they are sending plans for a warp drive they might aswell be sending a reptilian TDKR scene. "You're a big reptile"
Joseph Sanders
Lol what evidence? There is absolutely no evidence that we are alone in the galaxy. Every serious scientist believes that there are aliens out there, only 20 year olds who passed calc III and thus think they know everything say that we are alone
Dominic Cooper
>Currently all evidence points to there being none. We've only seriously studied one solar system, and we know of exactly one intelligent species.
Blake Mitchell
The latest ones aren't multiples of 187.5
Also, this is a load of horseshit because any amount of random numbers have a common multiple. But these aren't even exact multiples. It's arbitrary nonsense.
Gavin Davis
>Lol what evidence? The complete lack of evidence is pretty compelling evidence. Unless you're one of those that unironically thinks that until you've conducted a thorough survey of every planet, in every solar system in the galaxy. The lack of evidence is sufficient evidence for us to say that at present there is no evidence of life outside of earth. It's so obvious it's practically a tautology.
Mostly true, but see above. With a lack of evidence pointing towards your hypothesis, you can only conclude that your hypothesis is false. Certainly if more evidence becomes available then we update our views and revise our conclusions of the hypothesis. This is how science works.
Jordan Roberts
>"taking a scoop of water out of the ocean and observing no fish is proof that there are no fish in the sea"
Nicholas Cruz
That's partly fallacious, you already know the sea has fish in it. Better would be to say
>"you're on an alien planet, much like earth, you take a scoop of water out of its sea. There are no fish in this scoop. Can you conclude that there are no fish in this alien sea?"
The only sensible answer is to say that at present there no evidence to support the hypothesis that there are fish in the sea, but current surveys suffer from a poor sample size. To blindly assert that there are fish in our alien sea, and then to suggest that you can only be sure there is no fish if you survey every last millimeter of the sea, is pretty much the definition of pseudoscience.
What I'm trying to say is, you can only conclude what your evidence suggests, at present evidence suggests there is no life beyond earth (and maybe Mars).
Eli Allen
No thays a retarded conclusion from a retarded experiment. The only correct answer is "we dont know" there is no way to know that there are no aliens therefore aliens are a possibility just like fish in the sea is a possibility because FISH HAVE BEEN KNOWN TO LIVE IN SEAS JUST LIKE LIFE HAS BEEN KNOWN TO LIVE ON PLANETS >Maybe mars So you admit aliens exist?
Aiden Green
Sorry I didn't realise I was arguing with a literal retard.
>there is no way to know that there are no aliens therefore aliens are a possibility just like fish in the sea is a possibility.
Fucking kek, can we please get captcha to have logic puzzles or something to root out the morons?
>there is no way to know that there are no pink unicorns therefore pink unicorns are a possibility just like fish in the sea is a possibility
>there is no way to know that there are no giant flying dick suckling faggots therefore giant flying dick suckling faggots are a possibility just like fish in the sea is a possibility
Holy fuck, best laugh I've had today.
>So you admit aliens exist? Nope, I admit there's indirect evidence that might suggest that Mars either had life at one point in it's past or still has life today.
Andrew Long
>The chances of them doing so are 5 in 10,000
What you mean is 1 in 2000
That might as well be 100% even on Earth, let alone a universe scale
Jayden Ramirez
who is the fucking retard here? >Argues that there are no aliens in the galaxy >Admits that there may be aliens on mars
Ryder Ramirez
>Admits that there may be aliens on mars
Are you illiterate? I've literally said the opposite, but accepted the possibility that I might have to update my ideas on the hypothesis at some point in the future, but right now it requires further research before any definite updating can take place. Like I've said a couple of times now, this is literally how science works. Everything I've said is completely consistent.
This isn't a hard concept.
James Bennett
>all evidence points to there being none Is what you said then U turned on Mars implying that youre aware that NASA has evidence yhat there could be life there (water, methane, unexplored caves) And dont get me started on Enceladus and Europa. If it turns out that even barren rocks and frozen ponds can sustain life then its pretty guaranteed that Earth 2.0 Kepler or however many light years away is virtually guaranteedbto have life.
Aliens are real and they are 48 million miles away. Wake up sheeple.
Dominic Lewis
>dispersion wow, it's a statistic no one would ever reasonably transmit information in
Nolan Thomas
>are in the milky way alone >ARE No that's the fucking point
