When a physicist gets too close

>too close
How can they ever get too close? First they have to get halfway to you, but before they can get halfway to you they have to get halfway to halfway to you, but first they have to get halfway to that point...

>when a physicist talks

When was the last time you or any of your colleagues discovered something useful?

Btw stay back at least ten feet

>helleniggers considered this a paradox

Hahaha nice try you brainlets

>mfw physicists think they're "people"

Have his devious flim flams caused you to relinquish your emotional well-being?

>Veeky Forums - Science & Math

This is the stupidest shit I've ever heard and I don't know why everyone seems to consider it """"""clever""""""

no one considers it clever
people post it here as a joke
it's ironic shitposting

I consider you a """""""""""""newfag"""""""""""""

But not like on history of Veeky Forums level
On history of mathematics level.

Yeah, but outside this site too

Google "Zeno's paradox is stupid" and all you get is a bunch of faggots debating it like it's a serious thing.

It's a stupid meme made up by a greek pederast

Real life doesn't work like that. It's a hypothetical scenario operating under hypothetical laws of physics with no point being made.

Meant to quote you

Wow what a quality thread my fellow Veeky Forumsentists XD. We really produce some of the best quality posts on this website LMAO, r/science has a hard time keeping up ROFL.

only sensible response

>physicist detected

>thousands of years old thought experiment which proves that time and space are not infinitely divisible through the phenomena of motion

>heh, *tips fedora*

BRAINLETS GET OUT

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>it doesn't make any sense! trust me!
you don't need to convince anyone on this, newfag
we know you don't know shit because you're making a big fuzz out of this nonsense

>proves that time and space are not infinitely divisible
It doesn't prove shit, there's no evidence involved

>i don't understand!

GET OUT

Go back to l3ddit then fag

Pascal's wager states that it's better to believe in God and have nothing happen than it is to not believe in Him and go to hell.

This proves the existence of God, and if you don't understand how you're a brainlet and need to get out.

>This is what you sound like

>buttmad physicist from normieville can't take the heat

>your thought experiment is wrong because someone said something stupid once!

>pascal's wager proves the existence of God and is not about the expected value of the belief in God which also values his possible non-existence

>this is literally you

>I like to pretend to be retarded in Veeky Forums
>this makes me better than retards

Get off my board fagtron, philosophy can't prove anything.

The Greeks sure tried it, and they ended up thinking that lambs grew from trees, that light came from the eye, that arteries carried air and that a woman's womb "wandered" around her body if she didn't get laid enough.

>heh, i'll just claim he's pretending to be retarded

pathetic

Is this the dumbest poster on Veeky Forums?

Look, if you're still going to troll or act retarded, that's fine.
- Swear
- Ad hominem; Call people names
- Don't provide counter-arguments
- Reject realism and the scientific consensus
That's ok.
Just don't loop.
Looping is cancer.

Personal incredulity and the argument from ignorance are fallacies. You're ignorant.
You imply you have no knowledge of the other kinds, therefore they don't exist.
That is wrong irrational.
:D

>straw-manning this hard

o i am laffin. so where is your refutation of zeno's, brainlet?

I take it you don't have high reading comprehension?
I can post a test to check your knowledge of scientific principles and you can share the link of your results, timestamped of course.
:D

You have offered zero counter-point, zero counter evidence.
Therefore I see no reason to continue with you if only I have something to intellectually contribute.

Your denialism is fallacious.

>still no rebuttal
>more adhom

equally embarrassing and hilarious

Veeky Forums is for 13-25 year olds.
Reddit is for 22-35 year olds.
Very rarely are there any top level graduates online in forums anymore.
They jump to conclusions, straw man and contradict well known consensus-based concepts, and in some areas, they even reject axioms.

They don't seem to understand the importance of coherency or source.

In this case, user straw mans and then refuses to point to a source, just dictating anons memory justifies anons emotional retort and denial.

Debate etiquette calls for references, which I posted, and logical arguments without presumptions, which I posted, but I doubt anyone will take LOGIC for what it's worth when people can try to rely on self-serving biases and interpretations.

close your copypasta folder, bro. no one cares

shhh he's retarded enough to eat it right up, look

>brainlet keeps copypasting

>I totally noticed he was baiting me
yeah bro

>still no rebuttal
>more adhom

equally embarrassing and hilarious

>when a non-physicist exists

>he doesn't have a career in astrophysics/propulsion engineering

>he hasn't memorized every post on Veeky Forums! LOL

i've actually only been replying with pasta desu

wew lads

>still no rebuttal
>more adhom

equally embarrassing and hilarious

>tfw everyone on earth except you is a brainlet

>tfw when neckbeards still asserting their superiority to dead pile of trolling

>when a physicist gets too close

>when a physicist gets too close