Just wait until this sleeping Giant finally wakes up.
We will see a bullrun never seen before on Veeky Forums even ETH and Antshares(NEO) will pale in comparison to what REQ will pull off in 2018.
Delete blockfolio. Block coinmarketcap in your browser and don't go on Veeky Forums for a year.
Don't worry you will still know when it's time to look because you'll hear about REQ on national news plenty this year.
Sit tight and await the glory.
Other urls found in this thread:
blog.chango.tech
twitter.com
I have 2k REQ and just sold some Nano and link to fomo into XLM and have some 5k XLM.
Not sure if I should have split more of that money I put into XLM into more REQ
REQ makes up at least 30% of my portfolio. The biz obsession with this coin sometimes makes me wonder if it's not actually my smartest hold.
I'm just tired of Veeky Forums, man.
You own XLM
XLM is an overvalued shitcoin. Enjoy your 5x gains EOY, while REQ does 100x.
I'm tired of living near feral pavement apes. So if biz helps me move then it's all worth it
I actually believe you
Reqqies are so deluded lmao they held through a pump and dumped back to the prices before the bull run lmao
I don't even hate niggers that much. I hate white people who love them
>t. deluded venfag
I came from /pol too, for pretty much the same reason.
$10 EOY, $100 end of 2019
The prophecy is real
You all realize that REQ requires LINK to work.
So you might as well invest in LINK instead.
Could use alternatives
like what?
The only oracle service with fiat paring at the moment is chainlink, Request also say in their latest project update that they are in talks with chainlink for their oracles and they do not mention any other solution.
T. 10k REQ holder. Not trying to FUD, just discussion
They said they had 4 alternatives outside of LINK that they could use but due to a large overlap between REQ and LINK holders they are giving priority to LINK.
They haven't gone in-depth into what the alternatives would be so nobody besides the Request Network team themselves know.
However I personally also hold a bit of LINK so I don't mind them using LINK. Still this does not make them dependent on LINK. Just that it's a mutually beneficial relationship due to holder overlap.
Not sure. I have 50k REQ. All in.
I have 10k since .07 - i dont plan to sell. Am i gonna make it?
Kinda tired of the endless threads, but I legit think it's absurd that a project like this is at number fucking 90 on the crypto charts. There is literally no reason it should be below 50. What the hell even is Aeternity.
...
Its still a young project. Its actually pretty high up on CMC considering how old it is.
If you hodl till 2020
China will get involved and there willl be a huge crash in November. I'm from the future
What worries me is that they are being dependent on link working before they seriously consider backup solutions. And if link works then there is no doubt that the price climb will be much higher and faster than req. Makes me wonder if holding req is worth it.
What will REQ be worth EOY then?
What price can we realistically aspect eoy? 2$?
They only need LINK for oracle services such as tokenized fiat. Not their entire product hinges on it and they still got 3 months to figure it out. I'm sure they have a backup that they could always use if LINK doesn't work out. Again they specify that they have 5 different options for oracles somewhere in the whitepaper or updates (forgot where I read it).
$100 when?
How can you believe in a project that outsources it's promises to pajeet developers ? 30 million for something thats suppose to compete with Venmo and Paypal top kek
I unironically rationally think we'll reach $2 within the next couple of months. They have a bunch of partnerships with big firms that they still haven't announced and they will announce at least one of them this month.
They say it's a YCombinator company. People are speculating Coinbase trading app uses the Request Network protocol or AirBnB starts adding the "pay with Request Network" button as an paypal alternative.
Because those "pajeets" already finished some apps and turned out they weren't pajeets but German software engineers:
blog.chango.tech
They have 42 other companies making apps for them now.
But enough shilling for now. Just here to make other REQ holders realize that they just need a bit of patience.
Shit will take off if any of that happens
yeah i think he is back
Who is?
I think holding both REQ and LINK is a good idea. Both are going to be top cryptos in the next year or two. Just look at the absolute shitcoins in the top 50, some even top 25. There's no way these projects dont make it.
It has gotten to the point where I start to worry about my holdings if I see it shilled here.
Shilling on biz = FUD.
My portfolio right now. I love Req, but I am not certain enough to convert my btc into req. Grandpa might go on a huge bull run and wreck all alts. What do?
>We will see a bullrun never seen before on Veeky Forums even ETH and Antshares(NEO) will pale in comparison to what REQ will pull off in 2018.
Hmmmm where have i seen this before
O yea.... Ven as well as with 10 different coins shilled on Biz
>Massive sell walls finally go away on Ven
>No bull run
Never trust a shill on biz folks, DYOR
If the shill matches your research invest, other wise you will be left holding bags
This is sensible
But pls buy REQ sirs
not to be that guy. but vechain DID go on an ETH/ANS-level bull run. did almost 100x over the last six months.
REQ is less than 10x from the very bottom (post-listing, sub-ICO prices). it definitely has room to pull a 10x from here. even if it just goes back to its ATH it's already 4x
You stop trying to time the market and just hold the projects you seriously believe in after doing research and not care about small movements.
True but by the time VEN was shilled on biz daily it was already over $4 and we were all waiting for a 20x
I have since sold Ven for a profit, i got in at $2.50
We were all waiting for it to moon like crazy but every time it would get blocked by sell walls from VEN partners them selves
Now Ven is just bleeding
Req is a good project, i've done some reading on it. Problem is , it is really hard to get in the space. It will take a long time before something like that is implemented as 'paypal' 2.0
Fact is , there are so many projects today solving issue A , B , C, D , E
Some promising to solve all those issues
They cannot all do a 20x It just doesn't work like that.
Is 100K enough to make it?
This is exactly the type of comment that makes me think link and req are a scam
so you're saying Not everything can pull a 20x (this is obviously true) but you were fully expecting VEN to pull a 2000x? what?
ppl on biz see REQ consistently in the 90-100 range on coinmarketcap. they rightly see this as undervalued, at least in relation to the rest of the market, given the strength of the team, the quality of the roadmap and partners, the opportunities presented by the request fund, and the mainnet burning mechanism that has yet to be priced in.
it's less about "this has to go 20x just because" and more about "this really ought to be valued higher than a bunch of projects with currently a higher marketcap than REQ"
Holy shit you're a fucking retard, do you have any idea what XLM needs to do to even reach $1.50?
kek let him dream
He will be supporting Negroids in Africa dumping their 10 xlm bags on him in the masses
REQ should hit $10 before Link, thoughts?
I always see this being shilled here and my research leads me to believe this project has no reason to be adopted. It's not really trying to be PayPal 2.0.
The FUD on req has evolved immensely from actual concern and dumb questions from brainlets to meme questions, then to funny memes. Now that the project is about to take off it's regularly shilled and now getting hit with the classic "oh it's shilled on Veeky Forums obvious scam". Amazing to watch and see on a week to week basis
It's very similar to how OMG was fudded like fuck last year, but now you really don't see any of that and most people on Veeky Forums are bullish about it.
Besides the rare strangler that brings up >lmao vaporware no product
when they just finished releasing their wallet SDK. Before, it was >scam, skateboards, chinks, fucking Thailand lmao, Mcdonalds.
I feel like most people on Veeky Forums are bullish on REQ now. All it takes is a team consistently delivering good updates, transparency and communication, and deliverables to shut down most FUD since there's honestly nothing left but memes at this point.
I'd say my all-time favorite meme FUD is the
>With my luck, they'll pick my tokens to burn most of the time
absolutely brilliant, subtle and hilarious
>It has gotten to the point where I start to worry about my holdings if I see it shilled here.
I feel the same way.
Hey.
It's not about whether LINK fails, REQ fails, or if REQ switches to backup, because right now mostly likely LINK will provide fiat for REQ, and they'll both be sucessful.
What matters is LINK would need to be adopted before REQ, so there's no point in holding REQ.
I'm not saying REQ is shit just that LINK's price will explode first.
By the time you get absolute official confirmation REQ is accessing fiat through LINK.
LINK's price will have already exploded.
Disagree. Request Network's "Pay with Request Network" button will release this month and already be used by the companies they have a partnership with.
LINK will only be used for oracles of fiat pairs. Fiat pairs will only be introduced between Q2 and Q3 2018. Meanwhile REQ price is already rising since it's already being used. Just not all features will be ready.
I don't doubt REQ will go up.
REQ may 4x, but LINK may 40x.
The fiat conversion is what is gonna make REQ do it's own 40x.
>but LINK may 40x
On what fucking basis?
no they don't, they use escrow