How smart is he really?

How smart is he really?

I heard he got rich making an html phone book in notepad.exe and now everyone think's he's a genius.

smart, but definitely overrated.
he entered uni at 19 for one.

Smart enough to get rich and be a household name :^)

But, if you'd like, you can foster delusional feelings of superiority out of insecurity :^)

He has what psychologists refer to as "narrow intelligence"; meaning he's basically a high functioning autist.
Easiest way to detect an autist:
1.) Do they comprehend normal social rules
2.) Are there understandings and interests exceptionally narrow
3.) Do they have OCD behaviors
4.) Can they comprehend being incorrect

So he's basically an autist.
So was Howard Hughes [also had multiple other disorders], Bill Gates [also antisocial personality disorder], etc.

It's not uncommon for high functioning autists to corner a market normal people haven't thought to go in.

are their*

thats not a valid system of detection
you need descriptions
e.g.

easiest way to detect an autist:
does this
does that

you put questions in your criteria, which means you need to give a set of the correct answers (in order) so that we know this set of answers yields an autist

and no, you can't argue that [yes, yes, yes, yes] was made implicit by our own understanding of an autist

you are defining autists here, you can't use other's definition to help your definition

I did do just that.
But you're a fucking autist, aren't you?
Jesus fucking christ, talk about perfection in identification.
It says "are" and "do"; which are equivalences to "does" you autistic douche.
XD lolololol
I forgot your kind has extreme difficulty with language and communication as well.

this is not english and full of autistic apologetics

1.) Do they comprehend normal social rules (yes, no)
2.) Are their understandings and interests exceptionally narrow (yes, no)
3.) Do they have OCD behaviors (yes, no)
4.) Can they comprehend being incorrect (yes, no)

theres 16 sets of answers
you need to constraint it two just one set

but its still using implicit understanding of autism
you need to define it

it is english, and I didn't aplogize for autists

>Do they comprehend normal social rules
Evidence suggests not.

>Are their understandings and interests exceptionally narrow
Evidence suggests yes.

>Do they have OCD behaviors
Evidence suggests yes

>Can they comprehend being incorrect
Evidence suggests not

Congratulations, you have autism.

but you're defining autists
its still using implicit understanding of autism

you need to say

easiest way if someone is autistic:
1) they don't comprehend normal social rules
2) their interests and understandings are narrow
3) they have ocd behaviors
4) they can't comprehend being incorrect

and then say that evidence suggest this set of answers

you did none of that, and its a bad way to define autism, because it uses implicit understanding of understanding

admit you're wrong

University is pretty pointless and boring desu, if I had the choice of entering at 19 instead of 18 I would've done that instead.

I'd rather sit and study than go to pointless lectures which I can just get online for free, plus save tuition money.

No, you're wrong.
The idea that you BELIEVE people have to restructure sentences so YOU LIKE THEM is completely baseless and irrational.

I listed symptoms.
He fit the symptoms, and so do you.
Now you're samefagging on Veeky Forums.

I couldn't be laughing any harder than I am right now.
I'm about to have a heart attack.

>implicit understanding of understanding
your personal incredulity is never anyone else's problem, no matter what you retard!
LOLOLOLOL

def the best measure of intelligence

im not talking about restructuring
im tlaking about meaning

im not samefagging, how can I be samfaggit
nobody that's replied to me has agreed with me
makes no sense

you sound a normie btw

>implicing undertanding of understanding
that was a typo
i meant to say implicit understanding of autism

also, go back to rebbit lease

Oh, so you're trying to play a game of tautological fallacies?
Ok, keep using tautological fallacies then.
Not only do you not even grasp basic English and grammar, but your understanding of tautologies is hysterically in the gutter.

It's like you never graduated from college at all.

Stop using fancy words.
I don't need college for logic.
You never addressed my points.
Admit it, you know that you have lost.

>I listed symptoms.

No you didn't. You listed questions. You did not list which answers were symptoms of autism.

He knows where the money is and how to get it.

paypal
>internet shopping was in its infancy and needed secure payments.

tesla
>price of oil was going up. consumer electronics made batters immensely better since the ev1. government was handing out cash for alternate fuel vehicles.

spacex
>nasa needed new rockets with the shuttle program ending. developing countries and mobile communications in the west needed more launches.

solar city
>china flooded the market with solar panels and made them cheap. government money to put solar on your roof.

I hope you admired the structure of my post.

He's a battie boy but at least he's spending his fortune wisely.

Dude, you're fucking wrong. Admit it and stop trying to damage control.

This is fucking Veeky Forums, not your stupid personal blog. Grow up.

>I heard he got rich making an html phone book in notepad.exe and now everyone think's he's a genius.
What? Any twelve year-old can do this shit.
Fuck, I was doing this shit when I was twelve years old.

>Bill Gates
>antisocial personality disorder

Are you fucking retarded? Even if you think he stole windows, he doesn't demonstrate a level of disregard beyond that of your average CEO.

>posting on a science board
>getting this upset when someone uses rigor

you don't have to hang out here bro

The autism is right on this one normie, sorry. You didn't constrain your definition to a set of answers but only asked questions.

It's sort of autistic to point it out, but it's true nonetheless. Didn't even notice it myself actually but I know what you mean because I assumed the answers you were implying. The other dude is just trolling the shit out of you

>he entered uni at 19 for one
what the fuck does that even mean

He was accepted into a College University at the age of 19.
Which is normalish, if not late.

>paypal
He didn't invent that system, that was invented by a whole other group of guys. He had an online banking site which was like your run-of-the-mill online banking site, and saw what the Paypal guys were up to and realized it would benefit them both if they merged together and pooled resources.

>tesla
tesla is hemorrhaging money like a broken faucet because he focused on competing with automobile designers/manufacturers like Aston Martin and Mercedes-Benz without realizing that rich people buy those cars because they are luxurious, not because they use state-of-the-art tech.

>solar city
solar city is hemorrhaging even more money than tesla because it costs more for you to allow the government to subsidize solar power than to use something like hydroelectric or nuclear. The government, conspiracy theories aside, would rather you pay less money to use these energy techniques than to make everyone collectively pay more money for a technique that would only be viable for certain regions of the country to use.

He definitely knows how to get you to pay money, if that's what you mean

>Smart enough to get rich and be a household name :^)

*lucky enough to be born rich

Add a 5th one for restating the same thing over and over, Captain Spock.

It means you're in the brainlet board where we all pretend to be savants and look down on non-savants.

I fucking hate you people.