Smoking General

express.co.uk/life-style/health/675389/Babies-higher-risk-ADHD-mother-smoking

They just won't fucking stop linking smoking to as many unrelated diseases and conditions as they can, won't they?

When will the scientific community finally snap out of it and realize correlation =/= causation?

sott.net/article/268159-The-myth-of-smoking-during-pregnancy-being-harmful

dailymail.co.uk/health/article-514330/Smoking-months-pregnancy-does-harm-baby.html

Other urls found in this thread:

members.iinet.net.au/~ray/TSSOASb.html
sci.med.diseases.cancer.narkive.com/6qNYNZIZ/the-dishonesty-of-antismoking
wsws.org/en/articles/2007/01/doll-j09.html?view=article_mobile
fightantismokertyranny.blogspot.com/2009/06/japanese-smoking-paradox.html?m=1
islaslab.blogspot.com/2011/05/safer-cigarette.html?m=1
smokingaloud.com/death.html
nytimes.com/2006/12/01/opinion/01proctor.html?_r=0
sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/02/140227091247.htm
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

why are you pro-smoking and making these dumb threads you cancerbag retard ? do you enjoy misinforming people ? did marlboro put you on payroll or something ?

>shill gambit

Come on, why stoop that low?

I think it's pretty clear there is far more to the "smoking is bad" story than what people are accepting as fact. Far too many times, other factors are involved. Far too many times the "science" is just shirty surveys like the ones in the 1950's that were manipulated to get the desired results of the researchers (and I'm pretty sure THAT is pseudoscience).

If there is a genetic reason, or another cause behind these supposed smoking-related problems altogether, then people have a right to know and understand all of the facts involved.

So they're printing these just for the fuck of it ?

>Marlboro

Christ, you kidding me? Marlboro is a brand. The company is Philip Morris and I'm not being paid a dime. I just think that the smoking hysteria is exclusive to the U.S. and much of the west. The east and most other countries don't give a shit.

Wait, are you suggesting that one of the symptoms of lung disease, cancer and cardiovascular disease is that
IT MAKES YOU GO BACK IN TIME AND START SMOKING?

fucking brilliant, man. I think you're on to something here.

No, because the government and surgeon general demanded it. If they had the opportunity they wouldn't post it and for good reason, seeing as how most smokers don't even get cancer.

>most smokers don't even get cancer.
that's funny right there.

If I have a taxi company that kills 1/3 of its customers and say "most people that use our company won't even die," would you ride?

Because China and India are so well known for their health care policies.

They can't unfuck all the borderline propaganda they have produced thus leaving them to only double down.