Does the hard problem of consciousness invalidate materialism, Veeky Forums?

Does the hard problem of consciousness invalidate materialism, Veeky Forums?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_problem_of_consciousness#Responses
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Von_Neumann–Wigner_interpretation
youtube.com/watch?v=wJ71SXGEOCE
youtube.com/watch?v=4F5dT2k4AQg
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergence
phys.org/news/2015-03-particle.html
twitter.com/AnonBabble

do you think consciousness is some none-material soul or something ?

nope

only if you define conciousness to be some meta-physical thing, which it's not

any half way intelligent person can deduce the mechanism that generate self aware behaving entities

nop

kinda does, don't listen to the p-zombies

yes

No, it's materialism that invalidates hard problem of consciousness.

Qualia are fundamentally material, since all examples of minds that we have are inseparable from material brains. Whether they are "illusions" or some sort of emerging property are mere word games; it makes little difference in this regard. But I've yet to come across a hypothesis that gives a reasonable explanation how dualism might function.
Unless one can be provided, the "hard problem" is a trivial footnote in the greater projects of neurology and cognitive sciences.

>"consciousness explained"
>merely describes a few selected phenomena while ignoring the hard questions
Daniel, I'm disappoint.