Srs question

How are economics and psychology still taken seriously?

How the fuck can economies be treated like black boxes and worthwhile results expected?

How the hell can psychologists run lab experiments and expect real world parallels? It seems every """result""" gets overturned.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luddite
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>It seems every """result""" gets overturned
Post 5

economics is indeed retarded.
guessing about imaginary numbers.
numbers, by themselves, are already inherently imaginary.
and these people try to predict things that haven't happened yet...im talking more than a two variable set of equations...like a retarded amount of retarded variables.
if there were no money, there would be no middle man
people could work for free
they could also take for free
there would be no greed
because there would be no need
everything is quality
nothing is built shoddily
if everyone was poor
wed be richer than ever before

Eliminate secondary motivators and people will focus on the more primary motivators.

Ego depletion
Stereotype threat
Priming
Implicit association tests
Embodied cognition

Step 1. Replace human labor with machines.
Step 2. Enjoy how economists commit sudokus.

How have these been "overturned"?

Economics is fairly broad.

No, social sciences are pseudoscience.

Ego depletion has been overturned because not even the ORIGINAL tests could be replicated and still have the same results. Many variations on making people tired, hungry or stressed before giving them situations even have the reverse effect.

People are just fucking weird.
[spoiler] This fills you with determination.