how great is the difference between the human races really ?
and biologically speaking is it even plausible to differentiate the ethnic groups into "races" ?
and is it true that reseach which points into the direction of important differences like in intelligence etc is so politically incorrect that publishers or universities reject the funding or publication ?
inb4 SJWtards flood the thread.
Yes, genetic differences exist no matter how much some ignorant braindead retards try to deny biology
They're the same type of diversity you'd find in chimps, but less so. Bear in mind, we share quite a bit DNA with one another, as well as extinct subspecies.
>how great is the difference between the human races really ?
Infinitesimally small amount of change in the phenotype. Everything else is pretty much the same.
>Yes, genetic differences exist no matter how much some ignorant braindead retards try to deny biology
See
No there are tons of genetic variances. Get genetics 101 before attempting another post please.
Obviously you haven't met an abo
Divide the changes by the total amount of genes.
Tell me that is not infinitesimally small.
Not an argument.
That's certainly an interesting question. It seems obvious that if we can vary so much in physical appearance between races that it would be quite plausible that we can differ intellectually and psychologically between them. It's probably pretty difficult to actually measure though, as race and culture are so closely entwined that you might not be able to tell which is the predominant factor.
There's also the issue of what societies might do with such information. One one hand, while they could explain why we don't see equal outcomes/performance/etc for certain things, on the other there's always the fear that the information will be used as a basis for discrimination.
1 extra chromosome is infinitestimally small when divided by the total amount of chromosomes.
Tell me that is insignificant.