What's the expectation abd variable of the stochstic process giveb by
[math] dX_t = (X_t \, (1-X_t))^r \, dW_t [/math]
?
I'm mostly interested in r equals 1/2 or 1.
What's the expectation abd variable of the stochstic process giveb by
[math] dX_t = (X_t \, (1-X_t))^r \, dW_t [/math]
?
I'm mostly interested in r equals 1/2 or 1.
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
axiomsofchoice.org
math.stackexchange.com
twitter.com
I could add that it came up in modeling a distribution that can't take values outside of [0,1]. For r=1/2 it's a variation of the stochastic term in the "CIR model" and respecta the bounds I want
bump
senpaitachi
no takers at all?
I rewards with chocolate
explain briefly the theory behind this (only studied stuff like AR MA and ARMA kind of thing)
The ARMA model looks like a recurrence scheme where each new term is the previpus one, weighted by a phi and an independent/standalone fluctuation.
A stochastic differential equation scheme has x_i being x_{i-1} plus some function (set zero in the case I ask about) of that point, plus some function weigh multiplied by a fluctuation (dW)
I have 'a' equal zero and 'b' the quadratic function of X in the OP.
I wonder how the path of X will typically go. The function is not among the basic ones discussed in the books I now looked at.
Sorry for the crappy screenshots
ok tell me if this is bullshit for r=1:
separate variables
dXt/(Xt(1-Xt)) = dWt
when integarated, you get something like ln(Xt/(Xt-1)) = integral(dWt). Is this where you say it follows a normal distribution with std equal to sqrt(t) so N(0,t)
does that make any sense to you?
Such manipulations don't get you to an exact solution as (when thinking of a discretization) dW_t is not just a small positive quantity like in calculus, but instead a random value (normally distrubuted here, pic related).
I might use your rewriting in an algorithm to solve for X_t, but the stochastic Euler method sure is a more straight forward way to go and I did that (see third pic with the graph).
It's very unlikely that this equation has an exact silution, since I think to know that less complicated equations don't have one.
However, I'm only interested in the variance (or a similar meausre for the typical drift) of X_t anyway!