I'm raging against the failure of Veeky Forums cunts to differentiate between a hypothesis and a theory, as well as being anti-speculation for no apparent reason.
I don't care about that particular hypothesis/theory.
I didn't even bring it up.
I just came in autist raging out of the blue.
BECAUSE I HAVE MENTAL PROBLEMS!
...
I literally just got diagnosed this morning.
>Doesn't understand chemistry
Ayyy lmao
nice retort faggot
I guess Veeky Forums really as retarded as Veeky Forums. You all pretend to understand this world yet can't defend your beliefs. It's fucking pathetic.
It's not worth retorting when it's clear you have little understanding of basic chemistry. I'm not going to go over all of introductory chemistry just for you so I'll just leave you with a hint as to why it's an accepted theory: Energy, Thermodynamics and Redox Reactions. That's generalizing a whole lot but just apply it to the theory.
Stop bitching about Veeky Forums not entertaining your shitposts. Veeky Forums is not a replacement for entire university courses. Stop thinking we will dump entire lectures on you. It won't kill you to read a book, retard.
Holy shit you are beyond mad.
There is no way possible that warm soup can create life. Single celled organisms can not be birthed by stagnant dna.
Unless you would like to prove me otherwise.
Retard.
The point he was making was that Veeky Forums believes in a terrible theory without any sort of evidence to back it. By your empty response you proved him right.
You have heard of Miller-Urey experiment and later variations of the experiment, right? We were able to create biomolecules from that necessarily for life. We also see that in some formations of compounds that they replicate the structures of DNA. That's not the whole story though but it's pretty simple to see why people believe in abiogenesis for those reasons, among others.
I'm not saying I blindly believe in it but my issue with you is that you understand none of the concepts with it/ arguments for it other than taking it at face value. You also do nothing but provide empty responses because people disagree with you. In my opinion, I see you no different from the "if evolution still exists, why we got monkeys" type of people.
>accepted as truth
no scientist claims to know how exactly life started.