Boys btfo

Boys btfo

Other urls found in this thread:

cnn.com/2013/02/01/world/africa/nigeria-jews-igbo/
cleveland.com/metro/index.ssf/2012/10/cleveland_schools_spending_per.html
businessinsider.com/the-income-gap-between-blacks-and-whites-2013-8
jnci.oxfordjournals.org/content/89/3/188.full
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>If the genetic hypothesis is correct, children of elite African blacks will tend to have lower IQs than children of native black Americans, and perhaps even lower than children of low IQ blacks, the same phenomenon observed between American blacks and whites since native blacks are basically “more white” than African (or Caribbean) immigrants.

This is a complete falsehood, as even if white people are used by comparison, to 130 IQ parents tend to produce a child of around 115. To expect children of exceptional foreign blacks to end up lower than the average American black is ridiculous. Even if someone was half-black half-white, their IQ would be closer to something like 95, wheras 90 IQ +15 up would still put them around 105 (if two black foreigners had an IQ around 120 and mean African is 90).

>The stubborn refusal of their children to conspicuously regress to the much lower African genetic mean IQ (and not even to the African American mean IQ) predicted by hereditarians is simply inexplicable under their racial genetic hierarchy.
High IQ predicts scholastic achievement, but it is not excessively correlated. However, when you limit your high IQ population to those who did excel in school, you will get a significant selective bias for those who have multiple traits which predispose them to success in school. To elaborate, there are high IQ blacks that were not obtaining enough wealth to move countries because they were not as academically pre-disposed, and those results in high IQ and academically pre-disposed individuals leaving the country, so their children get a double-dose of academic genes.

> england
lmao

>Many bloggers and commentators came up with countless explanations for the unexpected trend among blacks from Africa who were expected to be around two standard deviations (30 IQ points) below whites in average IQ scores, but were only half a standard deviation below. Almost all the guesses on what could be causing this unexpected trend assumed that the upward trend would not continue in future to the point of actually equaling white scores, an event that could cause a crisis in the hereditarian camp.
Even since the creation of IQ, blacks were tested at 85. There is literally no scientific evidence they were any lower, and as the article even admits, the IQ's they reference were estimates. Not the IQ results that have been around for over 50 years. Half a standard deviation is 7.5 points, so saying blacks are at 92.5 IQ is actually quite good, and means they have gotten more intelligent since the past. If we only sampled natives, this could easily be explained by the removal of lead and improved standard of living for most blacks (School House Rock has the rice and beans song for example, which can be found as a dish in many old black-themed novels).

The article goes on to talk about how immigrants from thousands of miles away can be higher than UK average. That's not surprising in the least considering how much money and influence you'd have to have to get that far.

>Africans and athletics
Literally they have clear and overwhelming evidence the immigrants come from substantially better genetic background, yet won't admit it.

>Finally, it has to be noted that even if hereditarians can somehow manage to convincingly argue that the Nigerian (or Igbo) children in the UK do in fact have a lower IQ than average white children, as their biological model predicts (despite our evidence), they also have to show that these West African children even have a lower IQ than average black American children (since the latter have more white admixture)! At the very least, they should show that these children of “elite” Africans actually have a lower IQ than the children of equally elite native black Americans: the same elite black Americans whose children already score lower than poor whites, according to Jensen. That is by no means the most enviable task in academic history.
There are so many fallacies in here it's amazing. No "heredetarian" would argue that selective breeding produces worse offspring. Majority of Africans DO have lower IQ than white-country nationals. Literally it's a stupidly strawman argument to not make a discrepancy between unrestricted or otherwise non-intelligent selected migration vs selective migration.

>Chanda Chisala, originally from Zambia
BROWN STACYS REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Article so stupid that OP's pic is presented as evidence with no mention of dropout rates prior to the GCSE, selective immigration policy, or heritable low intelligence of parents being a causative factor in poverty.

On top of that, the rate of getting 5 C or better scores on the GCSE is a lousy proxy for IQ, as you can see from the significant gap between girls and boys.

Garbage argument is garbage.

BTFO

Holy shit the Igbo (Ibo) Africans are fuckin Jews.

cnn.com/2013/02/01/world/africa/nigeria-jews-igbo/

>Igbo immigrants are literally the best performing African immigrants
>Igbos are descended from Jews
You can't make this shit up.

Black jews? Veeky Forums's worst enemy.

Whiteys absolutely fucking destroyed holy shit

First dick size, and now brain size. It's over.

>tfw Yoruba

>IQ meme

>Article so stupid that OP's pic is presented as evidence with no mention of dropout rates prior to the GCSE, selective immigration policy, or heritable low intelligence of parents being a causative factor in poverty.
It's funny that whenever whites get BTFO by IQ stats suddenly the "muh socioeconomics!" argument is suddenly valid again
>On top of that, the rate of getting 5 C or better scores on the GCSE is a lousy proxy for IQ, as you can see from the significant gap between girls and boys.
Ahahaha so evidence that shows IQ fails to predict actual school performance should be thrown out simply because it makes IQ look bad? 10/10 scientific method. And lmao @ saying a 19th century online puzzle test is more valid than official school exam results. Lucy BTFO you in a maths test but you connect random dots better than her so that makes you smarter right?

>Super smart
>Jewish
>Black athleticism
>BBC
CAN WHITES EVEN COMPETE?

can you piss off with these bait threads?

I guess it's time to stop the welfare checks, remove affirmative action and shut the borders for good :^)

About that, the areas in England with the most welfare recipients are all majority white. No black areas even make the list.

im ok with this. I hate the chavs and pikeys as much as I hate niggers. (excluding decent, hard working black people)

> they have effectively nullified any arguments for a racial evolutionary explanation of the well-known IQ test score gap between blacks and whites.
Actually this is proof that eugenics works.

Our chav & pikey borough, Barking & Dagenham happens to be the one with the highest unemployment rate. None of the black boroughs even make the top five. The Asian ones do though.

The explanation is that the chav and pikey boroughs are outer London which no-one gives a shit about to fund, the Asian boroughs are full of people who can't speak English and the black boroughs have mostly integrated into British culture by now. Also they are the "traditional" run down areas hence they now get a lot of funding because they've been shit for so long.

So in short it's all socioeconomics.

What about Native American tribes?

It's really funny that in this thread where IQ gets BTFO it has died at 22 replies whereas all the pro-IQ circlejerks regularly get to 300 replies. I presume a butthurt racist mod will now come and delete the thread.

This place is a massive echo chamber.

I agree. I believe racism is irrational discrimination against a race. Saying certain races or groups have lower IQs is a fact and is not racism.

Stating facts about populations aren't even a discussion of racism. racism is judging an individual based on their race.

Strawman. You and I both know the real argument is whether it means certain races are less intelligent or not. According to this thread the answer is no. Veeky Forums doesn't like this so they hide the thread.

Well, some populations suffer from chronic malnutrition which in turn causes mental impairment. So not all Indians or Africans are dumb, but a large portion are.

>Veeky Forums doesn't like this
It's the /pol/ crossposters. They're continually getting BTFO in race/IQ threads, but keep returning with the same threads and flawed arguments.

> same template bullshit shitposting
how to stop a butthurt SJWtard 101. The only brainlets getting BTFO is you.

> same template bullshit shitposting
how to spot a butthurt SJWtard 101. The only brainlets getting BTFO is you lol

Really rude

quite racist

>Veeky Forums BTFO
wat

BTFO's BTFO

I am discriminating you as an individual for profound stupidity and violent tendencies.

Holy shit

/pol/'s worst enemy

They literally, figuratively cannot compete

> you get BTFO in IQ threads and whites/asians are always better
> you're stupid and violent.
SJWtard logic everyone.

"person
>no coherent train of thought
Just like, kill yourself. It will be better for you in the long run.

Kek, you're that same assblasted /pol/tard from previous IQ threads

You post that same webm with the same filename, every single time. It's on the archive. What motivates you?

/pol/ BTFO, sure, but why is all of Veeky Forums btfo? That's what I'm asking.

>Even since the creation of IQ, blacks were tested at 85
There is a difference between blacks in the US, who have significant white admixture, along with dumb blacks dropping out of school at young ages/going untested
And actual full blooded african blacks

Blacks are not really better at athletics, its more that there are a hell of a lot more of them, than there are of us. And we bring in the good athletes to play sports.

Along with the fact that very few whites attempt to play sports professionally, regardless of their capabilities.
As well as an unspoken anti-white bias throughout the sports community, half the population are liberals after all.

yeah yeah white race should go extinct I know sjwtard. too bad Bernie lost amirite ? It's okay though you love being in the losing team.

I found this webm from /tv/ where some butthurt whiner was crying about seeing a girl with a nice body on tv and thought it was sexist, and as you should know by now that everyone ridicules your delusional pathetic asses. People don't need a special reason to see you cry lol, you do it by yourself all the time anyway

Now go cry more about IQ you brainlet.

Kek
>same webm
Double kek
This guy never learns.

>is a retarded /pol/tard
>is american and automatically assumes everyone else is american
oh wow

> sjwtard is trying logic for the first time
don't try so hard you're gonna burn whatever braincells you got left in your tiny brain.

>brainlet.
>attempting to use Veeky Forums memes to fit in
lel, you're not fooling anyone

If you look at their IQ chart
It shows IQ's for children tested at age 11

Comparing IQ's by race among children is SCIENTIFICALLY FLAWED.
As blacks will develop slightly faster, leading to an inflated IQ score at a given age, which falsely overpresents their intelligence.

> SJWtard
> posting on Veeky Forums
the irony...

For started GCSEs are taken at 16, second of all this should mean that black kids in American high school should outperform the white kids

Hey, I'm not the one who claims to love freedom of speech. Last I checked, it was a /pol/ack that said that about Veeky Forums. Ironic that a /pol/ack tells me I don't belong here. One could say almost contradictory... but that can't be, it's /pol/ after all.

At any rate, newfags like you have to go back to the designated newfag boards, and .

> I support free speech
> Except when I don't like it, then its pol
and then you actually wonder why people call you a SJWtard...
When are you gonna learn that you're globally hated for your self-righteous deluded asses who are just as racist, intolerant and stubborn ? You don't have any place on the internet except for your safe space blogs. Otherwise, you're gonna have to accept that people can have opinions other than yours anywhere.

What does GCSE's matter about anything?

What sort of idiot actually believes subjective school performance has anything to do with IQ? The huge gap between white boys/girls is definitive proof that other things are going on.

>you're gonna have to accept that people can have opinions other than yours anywhere.
>was called out on doing this exact thing
>"no u" response

take your pills and get out of here schizo

Do you think people who score A at their math, physics, chemistry tests magically can't deal with IQ tests ? And people who suck at their grades can magically ace IQ tests ?

Are you fucking retarded ?

I don't support free speech. I think Veeky Forums should be for science.
Also stormfront fags come in with their memes, and make it impossible to discuss anything about human biology.

?
If you don't do homework, if you don't show up to class, if you don't study, you will get a low mark
Doesn't say anything about your IQ or intelligence, or ability to succeed in life.

Vast majority of teachers are liberal women, they are biased as fucking hell.

They're not the ones raiding every thread with gb2pol posts and thousands of SJWtard tier hitler memes and nazi references with absolutely zero scientific input on any topic.
Granted they know nothing about biology, genetics or anthropology due to their inexistant ecudation and think anything that doesn't depict different populations identical is racist but they just can't be in a science board.

GCSE is standardized test, nothing about bias. Your ability to get good grades is better indicator of what you are actually able to do. It requires some degree of both intelligence and not being a lazy piece of shit

I've been in school systems before, the bias is obvious and systemic

SJW is a pol meme.
No one else talks like this.

>Update
I've been in school systems before.

You are a retard and can suck my dick

nice le pol boogeyman

people with high IQ will have an easier time to succeed in their exams, i.e. less time to learn, on the other hand someone with a high IQ that doesn't learn or pay attention in class will have shit grades nonetheless

Or when the female teacher spends all her time with the dumb blacks/muslims that are struggling, and the rest with the girls, the boy stops caring much about school.

This hurts grades.

bill maher also ridicules the hell out of social justica warriors. i didn't know bill maher was a poltard.

now fuck off back to mouthbreather.

>le pol boogeyman
more memes.
This doesn't belong on this board.

>bill maher
/pol/ idol.
Still nothing to do with science.
Literally has a show called politically incorrect.
Remind me what it says on the top of your board?

>US black schools are criminally underfunded and understaffed
>This is not an argument for bad performance of black students
>UK white schools are criminally underfunded and understaffed
>This is an argument for bad performance of white students

>keeps spouting memes
>"it's probably a conspiracy!"
>"but muh pseudoscience!"
>"if you don't agree with "logic" kek, you are an SJW tard!"
Whiny faggot.

wow you're so mature on Veeky Forums

stop browsing this website if you can't handle opinions you don't like.

As an outsider I can conclude for this thread: /pol/ hasn't been btfo, but OP has made himself look even more stupid through it. Couldn't bring up a proper point on why the consensus on racial IQ difference isn't valid.

This board isn't called politically correct as nobody has the obligation to do so. If you want your kindergarten mentality politically correct autism heaven, go find one that says politically correct, unfortunately there is no board like that on Veeky Forums.

back to .

Schools are geared to being hostile towards whites, especially boys.
They are run by liberals, the politicians are liberals.

Irrelevant. Go discuss pseudoscience on Veeky Forums or /trash/.

> hasn't read the rules.
> still thinks everyone agrees with /pol/

>My politics define reality

This is what libs actually believe

> Schools are geared to being hostile towards whites, especially boys.
fucking what?
I'm a white boy and I did great.
Stop blaming your personal failures on the "system"

Keep telling yourself that.

Go discuss pseudoscience over there

you're the one disagreeing with mainstream science because it interferes with your perception of reality

> but muh liberal conspiracy

Show me right now the Veeky Forums rule that says posts must be politically correct.

oh wait...there is none.

now back to mouthbreather.

>Concensus and liberal politics defines reality

This is what liberals actually believe

>implying modern psych/sociology consensus isn't the actual pseudoscience

and keep spouting the boogeyman meme you little bitchboy

> politics
it's literally in the name
number 1 you fucking illiterate retard.

Stop spouting pseudoscience and boogeyman conspiracies over here. Go back to your hugbox

>prefers conspiracy over sociology
It doesn't matter go discuss non-science on Veeky Forums

KEK
This little boys will never learn won't they?

Yet whenever blacks point out that society is hostile to them they get told "No excuse! The Jews were gassed yet did fine!". But oh no, whites are allowed to whine about affirmative action as if it's equivalent to 200 years of genocide and oppression

You will not post any of the following outside of /b/: Trolls, flames, racism, off-topic replies, uncalled for catchphrases, macro image replies, indecipherable text (example: "lol u tk him 2da bar|?"), anthropomorphic ("furry") or grotesque ("guro") images, post number GETs ("dubs"), or loli/shota pornography.

>this little boys
learn english you illiterate retard

>non-science
Modern sociology is non-science on a wide scale, especially within american "universities" (whole liberal arts wing is unreliable due to modern-era subversion). Not my problem you were too dumb for actual science.

>Yet whenever blacks point out that society is hostile to them
Because they are lying delusional dumb NIGGERS
And if it was hostile to them, they would be LEAVING, since there is a whole continent of their own kind across the big lake.

>But oh no, whites are allowed to whine
Whites built this country for themselves & their posterity.
You're damn right I'll "whine" about you fucking marxists trying to destroy it.

>half his argument is a typo
KEK
>sociology blah blah
Go circlejerk about your "enlightement" on /pol/, redpillman KEK

>Whites built this country for themselves & their posterity.
By bringing over NIGGERS to build it for them.
What are you gonna say next, that they gladly immigrated to the US?

>history
Go discuss and circlejerk about not-science over there

>more strawmanning
q t

>keeps spouting memes
Go back to They will welcome any kind of shitpost.

been here longer than you though you evil meanie

Veeky Forums isn't for you, too "triggering" it seems

>It's funny that whenever whites get BTFO by IQ stats suddenly the "muh socioeconomics!" argument is suddenly valid again

Except we believe that socioeconomics does effect blacks too. Like everyone knows that a large part of the criminality of blacks is do to single motherhood mixed with the fact that they have higher average testosterone.

>US black schools are criminally underfunded and understaffed

I'm pretty sure when Title One is factored in black schools actually get more funding then private white schools. Like in my city public schools, almost entirely black, end up with the highest funding in the state. cleveland.com/metro/index.ssf/2012/10/cleveland_schools_spending_per.html

>Yet whenever blacks point out that society is hostile to them they get told "No excuse! The Jews were gassed yet did fine!". But oh no, whites are allowed to whine about affirmative action as if it's equivalent to 200 years of genocide and oppression

What do you think about the fact that blacks, when compared to whites, where more equal statistically under segregation. businessinsider.com/the-income-gap-between-blacks-and-whites-2013-8

I completely agree with you a white society is hostile to blacks because multi-culturalism doesn't work. This is why Jews who look white do so well in white societies. They pass off as white while still maintaining a strong ethic identity and being nepotistic.

People always talk about minorities being discriminated against and I agree but they're minorities for a reason, they don't belong here.

Whatever. Take the pseudoscience circlejerk to

>high testosterone dogs are dangerous
>blacks have higher testosterone
>They commit more crimes
This makes sense. I hope the genetic field keeps being funded well.

nice wahwahrgument, great contribution

Unlike you.

iirc it's not only testosterone levels but more so a combination (off the back of my head, estrogen-connected compound and a genetic component related to the warrior gene etc. (?, too tired to give all sources)), with those factors being prevalent in criminals.

I don't understand those concepts, but I know it's a interesting factor, which doesn't guarantee the fate of a criminal.

This is actually something discovered when looking into why blacks have such high prostate cancer rates. jnci.oxfordjournals.org/content/89/3/188.full

I actually don't believe that blacks are as stupid as /pol/ says they are , still believe they have lower IQ, but it has more to do with the fact that in America we try to raise blacks in a white system. I grew up next to section 8 housing and blacks are far more aggressive and need other blacks to put the rowdy ones in place. Except white liberals, mostly, think that some fucking white women can walk into a black classroom and teach them shit. You have to be forceful with them. Like take Ben Carson and his book like he had to forced by his mom to read books.

On a separate note the black community has been so destroyed that any successful blacks leave to join white liberal communities and in return those white liberals turn around and shit talk about how much racism has destroyed them. I would argue this false "equality" and desegregation has destroyed them.

Ya there are a few factors not just the testosterone,