Short list of scientists who believed in God (non-comprehensive)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_atheists_in_science_and_technology

Being a scientist doesn't save you from holding irrational beliefs. Just look at how many scientists believe in man made climate change. Or how many scientists of the past believed in creation or flat earth.

>denies meteorologist consensus
kek
keep trying "redpillman" kek

In the dark ages there was "consensus" on the earth being flat and humans being created.

>OP, i rename your list to people who were wrong about god.

>then, physics theories invalidated!
kek
Are you okay, friend?

>In the dark ages there was "consensus" on the earth being flat
You know very little history.Do you?Because this is one of the dumbest and more ill informed comments that I have read in a while

>Spinoza's 'god' == YHWH

Good one.

Did they all also believe that Noah carried every disease and STD known to mankind?

This board is full with fedora pseudointelectuals.I am not surprised desu

Spinoza was basically an atheist.His God was just the universe,as far as I remember

Notice how
A.) as time goes on the relevance of the people on that list goes down
B.) everyone on that list is dead

>A.) as time goes on the relevance of the people on that list goes down
Yes,society has been securalized slowly.Proves nothing really.It is a socail tendency,it is not really related to being more "enlighted"
>B.) everyone on that list is dead
Your point?

>it is not really related to being more "enlighted"
So I see they were sending satellites into orbit in the 1700's. Lol, get a load of this retard.

Yeah people like Laimaitre that basically formulated the Big Bang theory,didn't know about evolution or the big bang itself.Fedoralord,you are not nearly as smart as you think you are.Don't worry it is just a teenage phase.Soon you will realise that you are probably way dumber than you thought,and how retarded you sound,

Daily reminder that believing in God does not men taking the bible as truth
Daily reminder that the bible is reflective of the history of the jews and the tiny world view according to their perspective

>Noah's ark was probably the size of a small ship and consisted of two of every animal his wine-ridden ass could capture in a half mile radius

user, what are your qualifications? I'm a computer science researcher. I assume you attended the University of Mom's Basement, correct?

I am a computer engineer.You sound like an edgy kid.By the way downloading porn doesn't count as CS research.I am going to bed,dont bother to reply.

For one thing, even in the "Dark Ages" there was a consensus that the earth was round, as there had been a consensus among educated people since the Greeks. Flat Earth is a meme popularized by history classes who claim that Columbus was a flat-earther despite literally setting sail to sail around the world. Also, the idea of "consensus" in a pre-information era society is ridiculous because transfer of information and evidence was slow, there was no international community of scientists like there was now, and religion shaped science to a huge degree so regions with different religions would naturally have conflicting beliefs despite similar evidence.

For another, medieval scientists were cavemen compared to us. They fed people mercury because they didn't understand how the human body worked. We understand how the human body works now. They looked at the stars and said God because they didn't have telescopes or an understanding of astrophysics. We have both now. Comparing the ignorance of ignorant people to the ideas and facts given by genuinely educated people is asinine.

tl;dr Fuck outta here with your pseudoscientific redpill shit and accept the fact that science today knows enough to make rational judgements and that 99% of scientists have a universal consensus that climate change is happening and it is man-made. If you want to dispute it, then you're an egocentric asshole who thinks he's smarter than millions of the smartest people around the globe.

Nighty night kiddo. It's way past your bedtime anyway. :^)

There is bias and political agenda. I have yet to see convincing scientific data for your claims.

Same guy

And since I already did a rant here, its absurd and delusional to claim that religion makes a good scientist, or that lack thereof makes a good scientist. The literal cornerstone of all scientific method is to put belief aside when working on science. If they weren't able to do that, they wouldn't have been scientists. Every time people bring up "heres to people 200 years ago who were religious and also smart," all they're saying is that those people either 1) Worked in fields where belief in God didn't matter, or 2) Were smart enough to separate work from religion.

>inb4 hurr durr athecuck
By the same logic, people who shit on religion claiming it holds science back are stupid too. Anyone smart enough to do science is smart enough to either reconcile or separate them, so the religiosity of a given scientist shouldn't matter unless he's an idiot.

> I am a computer engineer.You sound like an edgy kid.By the way downloading porn doesn't count as CS research.I am going to bed,dont bother to reply.
> Who doesn't know how to space bar.
> I am going to bed,dont bother to reply.
> Because, I'll be busy being abused by my stepdad.

Well, shit, I guess your opinion matters more than millions of people who are smarter, better educated, and with access to better equipment and data than you. Your opinion doesn't matter if you don't know what you're talking about.

James Maxwell
Nikola Tesla
John C Lennox
James Maxwell

Basically every great scientist. It would be easier to create a list of great scientists who were atheists. Protip: there are none

>smarter
What makes you say that? You don't know me.

> better educated
You're clearly not one of them. :^D

>appeal to authority
And where's the science?

That's retarded, for many scientists their religious beliefs were the driving force for their discoveries - just ask Einstein and and Newton.

Anyways, you missed the entire point of the thread - it is saying that intelligent people who actually have scientific knowledge about how the universe works believe in God. This should give you a hint as to which worldview is better atheism or deism/theism. One of them is what scientists believe in, the other is what edgy teenagers believe in.

>except maybe evolution
that only works for weird christians
literally every other religion doesn't care.

> cherrypicks deists/agnostic deists, some who say the church is wrong
> thinks this is proof of a higher power
Pretty sure most atheists are "agnostic".
Personally I'm just against the idea of worship, even if there was a god.

Statistically, no matter how smart you are, there are hundreds or thousands of people who are smarter than you. You're outnumbered.
>where's the science
I assume the people who study science for a living have more of it than you. I could go google it and get charts or something, but you wouldn't believe it anyway, so what's the point?
>appeal to authority
I fucking hate when people copy/paste a fallacy and assume it applies and assume that makes a good argument. This is neither an appeal to authority or an appeal to populism nor a slipper slope or ad hominem or whatever else you want to throw at me. Its common sense and sound reasoning. Let's walk through this
>I do not know everything
>It is impossible to know everything
>I trust experts in their given fields to know relevant information
>Example: I trust airplane engineers to build airplanes, because I've ridden airplanes before and not died. I trust physicists to do physics right, even if theoretical, because 70 years ago theoretical physics gave us the atomic bomb. I trust computer scientists to make computers, because I'm on a computer right now. I usually trust doctors because they have helped me in the past and usually know enough not to kill people.
The list goes on
>Given that I trust experts in their given fields, because in our modern world it is silly and impossible to do so, I choose to trust that nearly every meteorologist, climatologist, geologist, etc etc aren't all simultaneously wrong on such a massive scale that it would imply that the entirety of earth and environmental science is entirely wrong.
>mfw you sit in an air-conditioned house, each component of which was designed by experts, typing on your computer designed by experts, in a world in which every single technological component is designed by experts in their field, to say "I think 99% of experts are completely wrong, and I am right because
>I have yet to see convincing scientific evidence"

Long list of the most influential scientists
>Cherrypicks
Uwotm8?

>Thinks this is proof of a higher power
It is

Most of them clearly JUST PRETENDED, they kind of had to, given the circumstances of their times.

*vapes fedora*

It would be easier to create a list of scientists who have nuanced beliefs that don't want to be taken out of context. It's all of them. And almost none of them prescribe to fundamentalist Abrahamic religion like the majority of the world does.

Also
>Tesla
>scientist
He was an inventor/engineer. His only science involved x-rays, and he did a really shitty job studying them.

Daily reminder that people that push shit like down your throat are arguing for biblical literalism.

*atheism/deism or theism

pewforum.org/2009/11/05/scientists-and-belief/
>only a third or less of scientists are part of an organized religion or could be classified as theists
>almost a fifth are deists
>rest are flat out atheist/agnostic
>half/half divide has remained fairly constant for the entire 20th century

>mfw "only edgy teenagers believe in atheism"
>mfw Einstein only cared about science because he was a deist who didn't believe in a personal god, and not because he was a brilliant physicist who was genuinely interested in learning how the world works
>mfw you still fucking think a list of what amounts to celebrity scientists is enough to dispute statistics and basic logic

>inb4 "But 51% of scientists are somewhat religious! That means God wins!"

...

>driving force for their discoveries
Source?. Naturalism (explicitely separating religion from science) has been a cornerstone of the scientific method since the enlightenment.