Lets see how "sexist" you are

People of Veeky Forums, lets engage in some actual psychology pseudo science just for fun. If anything, this will be fucking interesting.

Here is an article that has two parts. First, it shortly describes what it calls 'hostile sexism' and benevolent sexism. If you don't want to read the horseshit author let me summarize

Hositle sexism: "Discimination" that supposedly harms women.
Benevolent sexism: "Discrimination" that supposedlt benefits women.

I'm sure you can construct your own examples.

Then it has a short personality test type quiz that rates your degree of hostile sexism and benevolent sexism.

Post your scores and feel free to criticize the questions (there's a lot of shitty ones), the methodology, etc. I got

2.83/5.00 of hostile sexism.
0.00/5.00 of benevolent sexism.

The 0/5 makes sense to me, over the years I've become pretty chill and I've grown out of the phase of being weirdly nice to women just so that they like you back. It is better to just be neutral and let things happen as they go, it takes less energy.

The 2.83/5 kinda outrages me because there is nothing I answered that could harm women. For example, one of the questions is 'Do you think women are morally superior to men' and I answered 'strongly disagree'. My logic is that women are not morally superior, we are all morally equal, but I get the feeling that the test interprets my answer as if I think women are morally inferior to men, which is fucking weird.

So yeah, it is pretty biased and made by feminists but who cares, it is science. Pseudoscience but still, science.

Also please don't start any of your comments with
>I am a girl and...
We don't give a shit about your gender, just go right to the substance of whatever point you want to get across.

Other urls found in this thread:

pbs.org/newshour/rundown/are-you-sexist-take-this-quiz/
nature.com/news/over-half-of-psychology-studies-fail-reproducibility-test-1.18248
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

What about sexism against men?

The author and the "researchers" (big quotes here) are obviously retarded feminists so what would you expect.

Plus, I think that when it comes to female on men sexism there is just hostile sexism. There is no sexism on men that could even be classified as positive.

>There is no sexism on men that could even be classified as positive.
Yes there is. The idea that men are always stronger, more rational, better at leadership etc is a form of benevolent sexism directed at men.

Women are the cancer of humanity. Parasitic fuck holes, psychopathic leeches, disgusting animals, disgusting human garbage. They are poisoning everything with their vagina-centered anti-intellectual materialism, their toxic hormone-induced horniness making them blind towards higher values in life.

>The idea that men are always stronger, more rational, better at leadership

I would think that the only people who believes these things are male supremacists, so that would be male on male sexism, not female on male.

But you do have a point but we have to clarify that at least on the point of stronger, men naturall grow more muscle.

When it comes to being rational and better at leadership that is obviously just sexist speculation from actual sexists and usually male ones.

I don't hold those believes as I know plenty of retarded men and women and I'm sure everyone here at Veeky Forums has similar experiences that would make them believe the same.

Heck, everyone knows retarded people in their life. No one who is intellectually honest would hold these baseless believes.

>8181622

Without women, there'd be no good porn, and we'd have no way to reproduce, so eventually we all get old and go extinct.

Nigga, the only way I won't believe you are a troll is if you screencap a fucking 5/5 hostile sexism score, faggot.

Go troll somewhere else or deliver the goods.

...

Read pic related. Written in 1903 but still the perfect red pill on gender.