Lets see how "sexist" you are

People of Veeky Forums, lets engage in some actual psychology pseudo science just for fun. If anything, this will be fucking interesting.

Here is an article that has two parts. First, it shortly describes what it calls 'hostile sexism' and benevolent sexism. If you don't want to read the horseshit author let me summarize

Hositle sexism: "Discimination" that supposedly harms women.
Benevolent sexism: "Discrimination" that supposedlt benefits women.

I'm sure you can construct your own examples.

Then it has a short personality test type quiz that rates your degree of hostile sexism and benevolent sexism.

Post your scores and feel free to criticize the questions (there's a lot of shitty ones), the methodology, etc. I got

2.83/5.00 of hostile sexism.
0.00/5.00 of benevolent sexism.

The 0/5 makes sense to me, over the years I've become pretty chill and I've grown out of the phase of being weirdly nice to women just so that they like you back. It is better to just be neutral and let things happen as they go, it takes less energy.

The 2.83/5 kinda outrages me because there is nothing I answered that could harm women. For example, one of the questions is 'Do you think women are morally superior to men' and I answered 'strongly disagree'. My logic is that women are not morally superior, we are all morally equal, but I get the feeling that the test interprets my answer as if I think women are morally inferior to men, which is fucking weird.

So yeah, it is pretty biased and made by feminists but who cares, it is science. Pseudoscience but still, science.

Also please don't start any of your comments with
>I am a girl and...
We don't give a shit about your gender, just go right to the substance of whatever point you want to get across.

Other urls found in this thread:

pbs.org/newshour/rundown/are-you-sexist-take-this-quiz/
nature.com/news/over-half-of-psychology-studies-fail-reproducibility-test-1.18248
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

What about sexism against men?

The author and the "researchers" (big quotes here) are obviously retarded feminists so what would you expect.

Plus, I think that when it comes to female on men sexism there is just hostile sexism. There is no sexism on men that could even be classified as positive.

>There is no sexism on men that could even be classified as positive.
Yes there is. The idea that men are always stronger, more rational, better at leadership etc is a form of benevolent sexism directed at men.

Women are the cancer of humanity. Parasitic fuck holes, psychopathic leeches, disgusting animals, disgusting human garbage. They are poisoning everything with their vagina-centered anti-intellectual materialism, their toxic hormone-induced horniness making them blind towards higher values in life.

>The idea that men are always stronger, more rational, better at leadership

I would think that the only people who believes these things are male supremacists, so that would be male on male sexism, not female on male.

But you do have a point but we have to clarify that at least on the point of stronger, men naturall grow more muscle.

When it comes to being rational and better at leadership that is obviously just sexist speculation from actual sexists and usually male ones.

I don't hold those believes as I know plenty of retarded men and women and I'm sure everyone here at Veeky Forums has similar experiences that would make them believe the same.

Heck, everyone knows retarded people in their life. No one who is intellectually honest would hold these baseless believes.

>8181622

Without women, there'd be no good porn, and we'd have no way to reproduce, so eventually we all get old and go extinct.

Nigga, the only way I won't believe you are a troll is if you screencap a fucking 5/5 hostile sexism score, faggot.

Go troll somewhere else or deliver the goods.

...

Read pic related. Written in 1903 but still the perfect red pill on gender.

I actually forgot to link to it.

FOR FUCKS SAKE.
pbs.org/newshour/rundown/are-you-sexist-take-this-quiz/

The true red pill is that you should judge people as individuals.

Lol. You've never had sex.
And you never will...

not remotely science. time to clean the garbage

Science is about valid generalizations. Take the laws of electromagnetism for example. We don't need to explore a new special case for every instance of electromagnetic phenomena because we already have a general theory. Same with gender.

The people who made it are actual psychologists, probably with PhDs.

That makes them for scientists than you. even if they are shit.

pbs.org/newshour/rundown/are-you-sexist-take-this-quiz/

this test is heavily biased

This the part where I make a generalization and refer you to

I've had too much sex when I was too young to fight against it. Sex is the most disgusting act and literally the source of all evil. Without women and without sex, humanity could live in peace.

But we are dealing with people here.

We can get statistics about women having lower average IQ but does this make it okay to start threating all women as being stupid?

All that we can record in human population are averages and those are fine but if you then take that women are in average less smart and then you apply that judgement on a woman who is smarter than you then you already fucked up.

So discrimination based on statistics is wrong and will be wrong until you can show that literally ALL WOMEN are stupid.

Yeah, I know. Don't you still want to know how sexist you are in the eyes of the average sjw cuckold?

Okay you are trolling. Thanks for making it obvious my man.

pbs.org/newshour/rundown/are-you-sexist-take-this-quiz/

Nahh this is trash tier 'personality testing' you find in Cosmo or 17.

Well,
>Peter Glick, PhD (University of Minnesota) is the Henry Merritt Wriston Professor in the Social Sciences at Lawrence University, where he has taught since 1985.

Is one of the guys involved. This proves that is is science.

Now can you just stop being a killjoy and go along. Check out just how supposedly sexist you are.

pbs.org/newshour/rundown/are-you-sexist-take-this-quiz/

This is not a Veeky Forums thread, this is /pol/ trash.
Although I dislike feministic propagande, this type of shit is as bad

>But we are dealing with people here.
Women are not exactly what I would consider "people".

>All that we can record in human population are averages
There are many more inferences one can make from statistical data you fucking pleb.

>until you can show that literally ALL WOMEN are stupid.
Intelligence wasn't the point here. Women are immature, animalistic and anti-intellectual. They themselves reduce their entire existence to their holes, while expressing open contempt for higher values in life.

The people behind this are PhDs in their respective fields of social science.

This is fucking science, just accept that science can also be flawed and play along.

pbs.org/newshour/rundown/are-you-sexist-take-this-quiz/

fucking lol

nah they will never get any sort of power so i don't give a fuck

> actual psychologists
Oh well there's no debate than

Psychology is NOT science, look it up. And this garbage belongs to or and definitely not to a science board.

'Social Science' is about as scientific as Scientology

Dumbass.

>Women are not exactly what I would consider "people".

This made me chucke, fucking hell. This shit takes me back to my /r9k/ shitposting days back in 2014. Great times. I have a lot of the sexist graphs and pictures to.

>There are many more inferences one can make from statistical data you fucking pleb.

Sure, whatever. You cannot judge individuals on average results. That would be dishonest and really retarded.

>Women are immature, animalistic and anti-intellectual.

Some women are (probably more than I'd like) but you should still not treat all women as if they are animalistic and immature, because some of them will not be.

pbs.org/newshour/rundown/are-you-sexist-take-this-quiz/

Qualitative research is not science
I studied political science before I did physics, how these ''scientists'' define reability and validity is absurd

I hope you're trolling and not actually this pathetic.

I feel bad for you user.

Hey, I am not too fond of psychology myself you know? This is all just good fun for the whole family.

Also, psychology is technically science so that makes it Veeky Forums material, regardless of how much you cry about it.

pbs.org/newshour/rundown/are-you-sexist-take-this-quiz/

A woman has literally nothing to offer to me. I'm not interested in her holes. In fact I consider them disgusting. And her personality is even more repulsive. Simply toxic.

Reliability* Sorry English is not my native language

I like when women suck my dick though. I wouldn't trade that for anything.

I am not too fond of their pussies though, but whatever.

JUST DO THE FUCKING TEST
pbs.org/newshour/rundown/are-you-sexist-take-this-quiz/

Oops.

nature.com/news/over-half-of-psychology-studies-fail-reproducibility-test-1.18248

Are you not getting it ? Philosophy topics do NOT belong to this board. If we wanted to talk about philosophy we would go to or where you should fuck off to right about now.

Philosophy is not psychology though. Psychology is a science.

THE FUCKING QUIZ FFS
pbs.org/newshour/rundown/are-you-sexist-take-this-quiz/

I don't need to take a test in order to know that I hate women.

what the fuck has been with all the sexism threads recently getting super busy

are we getting brigaded or something

I'm sure you faggot will score 5/5 in benevolent sexism, you fucking door holder.

Your hostility is just a facade, I bet you secretly want to lick women's toes.

Do the test my nigger to see if you are actually sexist

pbs.org/newshour/rundown/are-you-sexist-take-this-quiz/

>he fell for the "Not All Women" meem.

might as well say, "Not all dogs are dumber than me." Well, in your case, that might be true.

What kind of psychology are we talking about here? Freud or Psycho-neurology?

This is not a sexism thread, just general psychology.

Do the test and find out my man

pbs.org/newshour/rundown/are-you-sexist-take-this-quiz/

Modern (not that it matters) gender science

If you give an IQ tests to every dog on earth they would all score 0.

If you give an IQ tests to all women some would get 70, some would get 200.

That is the difference, fag.

Fuck if I know. I don't know shit about psychology, all I know is that the people are fucking PhDs.

pbs.org/newshour/rundown/are-you-sexist-take-this-quiz/

So are you gay or asexual?

I have one person saying gender which has nothing to do with psychology and another who has no idea what psychology is about, linking a page where no referenses whatsoever are given
This is not a Veeky Forums thread

> Psychology is a science.
Oh boy this meme is so hot right now.

Please show me the quantitive, measurable and falsifiable evidence that you use in your studies.

so would children, and i wouldn't take advice from an 8 year old no matter what a piece of paper said his intelligence was.

neither

>hostile sexism
5
>benevolent sexism
3

I'm fine with this.