Why have men contributed more to science and mathematics than women?
I know that scientifically, women are the inferior gender. But are they really that dumb?
Is there an evolutionary reason behind why women are stupid?
Women
Brayden Clark
Jonathan Thompson
>we won't teach you any math!
>why don't you know any math?
Kevin Thomas
Males are socially dominant.
The Greek aristocratic class were the most socially dominant members of society.
Due to this, women were not given much of a chance at contributing.
However, when women have been given a chance, or even taken th chance one could say, they have proven themselves to be equally as proficient.
Genetic and environmental (cultural) differences seem to be at the root of why women have not been afforded the same degree of opportunity, as well as why they might not wish to enter a realm such as professional critical thought and abstract conceptualisation.
However, whenever they are given the chance and actually have the desire to succeed in science, they tend to do equally well.
David Sanders
That's not even a viable argument, even in today's world, women are the ones who prefer remaining stupid and vapid rather than learning something. Men outnumber women in STEM fields.
James Collins
To clarify...
That is to say that genetic and environmental factors underly the sex disparity in the sciences and academia in general.
However, these factors primarily relate to dominance and ambition, as opposed to general intelligence.
Dominance and ambition were more favourable for males throughout human evolutionary history and male dominance has lead to the development of patriarchal societies in many parts of the world, which historically have prevented women from accessing academia.
So, yes it's genetic and environmental, but it's not because men are inherently smarter.
Easton Price
it is natural for men like you to crave the validation of their existence and get depressed if they fail to feel relevant, responsible.
The best way for a man to cater his need for approval is to serve some woman (and some of her children) through emotional&financial support.
Men are pleased to contribute to someone else life, to support their family.
Why women are a good way to feel relevant? Because women love to be provided for and each woman will always find a man ready to please her.
[for most men, the best feeling of feeling real is when the girl moans from your cock in her pussy]
THe problem for men is that they are disposable in the eyes of each woman, since all men wish to serve the few women who talk to them.
Men must thus invent several ways to please women, invention and creativity which strengthen their feeling of being worthy, relevant, in touch with reality.
Men are too impotent to find other way to feel real.
Once that the a woman replaces a man by another provider, the man gets very upset and depressed.
THis leads men to think that they are better than women, stronger, smarter and that they must built a life outside women. Some men manage to indeed built an empire, but they will always loose it for some women.
Women give meaning to men and betas, no matter how successful outside women, will always give up everything for some relationship with some woman who claim to fancy them.
Jason Gray
Why did you even post that pseudoscientific drivel?
Get out.
Asher Moore
women aren't "that dumb", they can be more or less capable than man. In general they're dumber because they're not driven to logical as much as guys (maybe different brain chem). There are many more guys studying the cool shit so they make the discoveries. Also imo they have a higher EQ. I don't know if that's very valuable in research though
Nathan Cooper
It is not only a viable argument, it is the main argument. Not enough time has passed to change how women are looked upon in today's society. Similar situation with black people.
Jacob Scott
1.Intelligence is distributed less evenly in men than in women, i.e. there are more geniuses but also more retards among men.
2. Men are more likely to take risks
3. Men are more likely to favor interacting with objects over interacting with people than women.