When the title of his PhD thesis begins with the word "On"

>when the title of his PhD thesis begins with the word "On"

Can we get a red flags in academia thread going?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_Bullshit
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>p

>Discussion section mentions "the mitochondria is the powerhouse of the cell..."

You're clearly op. Take the anime reaction pics back to /a/ dude

>Title of the paper begins with "Towards"

>null hypothesis
>Marxist framework
>cultural
>critical

Fucking this. My boss does this all the time. Seriously, fuck him!

There aren't as many people in on your conversation as you're pretending there is. Quit responding to yourself

>when the five page white paper has eight authors
>all from the same Chinese university

Nice meme

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_Bullshit

On OP and his homosexuality.

Why is this so common?

>dark matter

>when the paper's only citations are from the authors of the same paper

>pure math paper written for the sake of writing it, no interesting results, no discussion of philosophy, background, or even implications.

>p a r t i a l r e s u l t s

>wikipedia as source

>facile, green, enantioselective, novel, catalytic, photoredox, nanoparticle-promoted, ionic liquid based synthesis of a class of substrates so specific they are the subject of 10 papers in the history of chemistry
>Chang, Cheng, Xu, Yie, Cheng, Huang, Han et. al

>you can find the same article in different journals just with different pictures
Are you kidding me

>when the professor's only collaborators are from eastern europe/china/india

I'd also like to know why so many chinese researchers work on computer vision, and why it's almost always health related.

When the title of his PhD thesis begins with "Harry Potter and..."

GET THE FUCK OFF Veeky Forums AND NEVER COME BACK, YOU DISGUSTING HUMANITIES WANKER

>implying it's bad

> Unless you choose to pretend like you read the source cited by the wikipedia article, your research is trash

Eat a black dick

Take your pedophile cartoons back to .

Fucking degenerates.

>implying it's good working with third worlders with no funding who will submit your work to the Indian Journal of Applied Plumbing

On [math]O_n[/math]

>Cuntz

>when he puts an inside joke in the acknowledgements section of his thesis
ffs have some professionalism

Red flag meme is already bugging me and I've only seen it for two days.
EVERY FUCKING BOARD

Veeky Forums makes fun of "normies" and trends but has its own set of bandwagon stupidity

Right OP, Grothendieck's Tohoku paper was straight garbage.

>Veeky Forums makes fun of "normies" and trends but has its own set of bandwagon stupidity
It's almost as if all social groups are social groups.

>professionalism
I know right. I also hate when my roommates puts the silverware on the table before the plates. Or when he finishes eating and just throws his silverware on his plate randomly instead of the "I'm done" orientation.

Not really, just mocking you. Professionalism in a paper most likely esoteric is stupid. Especially if it's just a small inside joke.

Wish I was as smart as you

it's some kind of rule in their academia
the entire department where the author did the work is also listed as authors

Kek

>Be this guy
>Get employeed at a restaurant
>Tell the customers to take their hunger to a restaurant and kicks them out
>Get employeed as a police officer
>Tell the robbed person to take their problems to a police station
>Be on a anime related Imageboard
>Tell people who are posting anime related stuff to fuck off
>Die from terminal cancer

it depends. i clearly don't feel like i need to cite respectable source when i'm trying to point the reader to some kind of more or less inessential background information. e.g. when i'm using a football (for the US faggots: soccer) example which relies on the material of the ball and i want to provide the source where i have this from because i'm a nice person, i'll use wikipedia why not. it's not like my example is going to break down if the wikipedia page is wrong; i might just as well have defined the ball to be as such, i'm simply using the actual object as reference.

That's entirely possible if they are building upon a lot of past work they did

Spotted the literal newfag.

Jesus Christ

>Fock spaces

This isnt an anime image board you fucking retard. This is an image board.

There's the newfag meme

Fucking cringe. Please go back to where you cake from and stay with your intellectually inferior friends

>anime girl is posted
>poster isn't an anime girl themselves i can have sex with

...

This guy for real?
Calm down niga

I come from here. Never really post anywhere else. I am a product of people like you

I am more "degenerate" and less 'normal' than you for sure, I don't even hate anime, but I do hate people trowing their anime shit into non-anime boards

I was here before you, fucking pedophile.

Take your degeneracy over there

>When he cusses in a professional research paper
cuntz
Fock