>is still biased against women.
wew big claims there my man, lets see how you explain yourself.
> Which is fucking bullshit
You are right about the point you are making but it is not bullshit. Someone who has been working constantly will know more than someone who worked for a while and then took a break.
Get a friend and both learn to play the piano. After you are both relatively good just stop playing but have your friend continue doing so. Then after 1 year have a piano competition and see how he beats you by a huge fucking margin.
>has proven time and again that they're capable of keeping up
Again, you are correct, but if everyone looking for the job is capable of doing it then why not try to look for the best one. After all, people hiring are a business first and foremost. A new employee is an investment and if they are all going to take the same pay then just pick the one that is the best and to do this you will have to pay close attention to detail and working constantly is one of the details that will make the difference.
It seems that you are just assuming that women have to take long leaves. Sexist much? This is the 21st century you fucking sexist, women can choose not to be housewives and not have children so that they can be competitive, shitlord.
> it's the childbearing woman
Indeed but welcome to human biology. All the woman has to do is say 'lets not have children' and then let it be. Do not have children and flourish in your career. It is literally that easy.
Boy oh boy, looks like the one biased against women here is you. Stop pretending you know how all women will act because you don't. Literally the solution to all your made up problems are
>DO NOT HAVE KIDS
>b-but I want to have kids
Then you never wanted a career in the first place.