Can someone give me one good reason why this won't moon?
REQ
Jace Ward
Other urls found in this thread:
powh.io
twitter.com
Alexander Rogers
because it's a speculative asset in a speculative market with no functional use case to drive the price.
Lincoln Watson
Ok, agreed on the first part. How is there no use case? If it is used by vendors instant cheap payments are a pretty big deal.
Easton Wood
It has use case but it just isn't currently implemented. It's just speculation until it becomes reality. If it then gets used the price has to increase.
Nicholas Harris
How much it go up
Thomas Morgan
Depends on how much it's used. That will take awhile though unless there's major companies waiting to jump onboard. Wait to see if they get any major partnerships. If they don't just dump it on the next market bullrun.
Charles Turner
It won't moon because it will eventually burn all its tokens and then what?
Weird and creepy
Jose Brown
Buying coins on centralized exchanges is a meme, especially in this market. Always invest in the next big thing, which as of now is decentralized investment smart-contracts powh.io
Jason Reyes
REQ bagholders getting desperate roflmao
Those bags feeling heavy anons? kek
Xavier Price
>what is exponential decay.
Nathan Nelson
Basically, it's just too early. The real winners are going to those tokens/coins that work without your average Joe or Zhou realising.
Wyatt Bailey
ugh. it better make it or im a goner
Cameron Ward
>next bullrun
Kek. Never will happen
Jackson Sanders
So it will just burn even faster? Shitcoin
Matthew Lewis
that's what REQ will do
>normies send fiat over Request Network
>tokens get burned
>crypto neets win
Parker Walker
It is scaring me how close main net is, I'm intimidated, I think it's gonna dump...but it may do other things
Aaron Price
it'll probably go down a bit
really the moon mission should being when fiat implementation is added sometime in Q2 and advertising hopefully starts
or it won't cause Bitcoin will have another hissy fit, who knows
Jaxon Reyes
why would it?
sage this useless thread
Dominic Martin
when main net hits its gonna crash like a rock when people realize dev is further off than anticipated. this is a long hold though, wait until december
Ryder James
>dev is further off than anticipated
do you know how to speak English?
Evan Stewart
development you fucking retard.
Christian Taylor
Impossible. Unless never means less than a year to you.
Jace Bailey
there are 2 projects already named and being shown off built on top of the network, I don't know why their development would be off.
also using "dev" doesn't work for 'development' you fucking dumbass
"dev" is short for "developer"
Hunter Gray
dev can totally be short for development you small brained neanderthal. and yes their network will take years to develop.
Thomas Fisher
>will take years to develop
>literally pulling that out of his ass
adoption may take a while but I don't think the development of the network itself will
I've never seen 'dev' be short for 'development'