If anyone was here for digibyte, this was chainlinks "citi" moment. Even Jonny from linkpool is saying smart contracts are 3-5 years away. Pivotal tracker says they're at least a year away from turning the main net on, they haven't started writing the contracts, Sergey is no longer doing conferences.
Hate to say it but this is over. Coins have one shot, like assblaster said sergey had one chance getting the code out there, but evidently it didn't get enough traction and there smart contracts are just not far along in adoption and interest for chainlink to matter much.
Let's all move on to something else and forget about this mistake.
>smart contracts are 3-5 years away smart contracts on ethereum run normally from quite a while rephrase what you wrote as it is pure gibberish
Aaron Lewis
I was in Chainlink presale, so I didn't lose any money, but this project taught me one of my biggest lessons ever in my five years in crypto. That is, never fall in love with projects, and above all, INVEST IN STRONG TEAMS. A two-man team (of which half in this case is a fat, useless, Big Mac eating retard) was NEVER going to pull this off. If almost any other team in crypto were running this project, this would already be a top 40 coin at least.
Should have been obvious right from the start, but lesson learned. Dump your bags while you still can anons.
Xavier Johnson
Whenever I read through these threads I always Ctrl+F Big Mac so I can see which posts are obvious posts that I can skip over.
Blake Morales
>going down with the ship Hey look on the bright side, at least you have SIBOS 2019 to look forward to, kek
Jeremiah Kelly
I learned to just invest in alts in accumulation, and until further notice these bullshit fundamentals people think they know about dont matter. I dont hold bags, Ive been making money the last month and a half while people have been losing like crazy. Why? Because I dont believe in speculative FA. Worst meme in crypto is FA.
Jeremiah Nelson
Checked
Link marines stay strong
Kevin Morales
Haha, Chainlink IS like DGB 2.0. Thanks for reminding me OP. Time to laugh at Linkies again.
Christopher Martin
>Chainlink IS like DGB 2.0. With the difference that it didn't went x130.
Leo Lee
Feels good dropping bags. Bought in at 0,70 sold at 0,40 and reinvested into something that will actually boom later this year
Gavin Campbell
Link might go down to $0.02 first though
Carson Hall
Of course. Too bad linkies didn't have their time to shine. Hell, DGB was a top 10 coin at one point.
Carter Anderson
Nice, you bought high and sold low.
Camden Sanchez
Copypasta and fud. Link is still the best project out there. Go take a nap, fudders
Eli Sanders
Wait what? You guys rly believe its dead?Dafuq
Kayden Brooks
Actually yes
Samuel Butler
No, people are just fudding either because they want it to dip a bit further or they just like to fud.
John Williams
You're right, but this won't stop the cult members from daily delusional posts
Henry Thomas
Sounds like DGB retardation earlier last year. Go back in the archive and read DGB threads around there, you'll get the same exact delusion. Might shine some light on your situation.
Gavin Rogers
hey faggot. how about you wait 12 months before you become a millionaire? ever think about that? whats so fucking difficult.
Adrian Turner
I remember DGB, I also remember buying eth at $6 and I'm all in Link now
Angel Roberts
Fundamentals between DGB and Link are VASTLY different.
Digibyte is yet another blockchain tech claiming to be better in some way than bitcoin.
Link is the market leader for a new product (decentralized oracles), that will itself lead to new products (smart contracts using external data)
Comparisons are invalid
Xavier Brooks
Best FUD yet. Impressive.
William Jackson
How about that 2 team member thing that sounds kinda tru if u think about it
Austin Hill
Pretty much all full altcoin implementations are years away. Yet they're doing very well, while Chainlink is back on its way to the 100th rank.
Face it, it doesn't matter if Chainlink is good or bad, it's damaged goods and will never moon like so many others did, regardless of how incredible its partnerships and use cases become.
Jacob Stewart
Yeah must feel real good to lose money...
Hunter Myers
Google, Microsoft, Apple, ... all started by two-man teams. Amazon trumps them all and was started by one guy.
Don't be dumb.
Tyler Gomez
I'll be holding my 90k Link until I'm a multimillionaire.
I know it will come, but I don't know when.
Could be this year or 3 years from now, but I will be laughing my ass off at the retards that sold Link below $10.
Hunter Hall
Here's some more golden autism for the archives. Keep 'em coming. I'm sure you'll be posting about how right you are 10 years from now when Chainlink gets pushed sideways for an eternity.
Samuel Barnes
>$.40 I fell for the fucking meme, even dogecoin is doing better than LINK. This coin is a joke, sergey is a joke. This project doesn’t announce anything because IT HAS NOTHING TO ANNOUNCE.
No partnerships, no roadmap, no new developments. Fuck this shitcoin and everyone who shilled it.
There's no doubt that Chainlink has one of the very biggest use cases, the very best industry exposure and connections, and the most ethical team (eschewing empty hype etc.).
But none of that matters, Chainlink got burnt at some point, and now nobody will touch it anymore.
I'm convinced that Swift could announce full Chainlink implementation tomorrow, and the price would barely crack $1.
Alexander James
>I am certain there will never be a competing product that will ever challenge ChainLink. It's literally impossible.
Robert Long
There are a bunch of mutual competitors among the top cryptos. Having competition doesn't mean you can't soar.
It sounds good on paper user I'll give it that But.... that is on paper This crypto market is dead for the time being, and even if it was alive Link was never.... that coin if you will I was going to buy the dip, but at this point i think i'm gonna cancel my buy orders Since that conference was an absolute fail
Henry Bailey
what do you mean "in accumulation"?
Oliver Hughes
Someone should really make a Veeky Forums indicator for TA. >buy when FUD on Veeky Forums is high >sell when FOMO on Veeky Forums is high
Cooper Long
>No partnerships They're still developing, major partnerships right now would make very little sense.
>no roadmap Only thing that matters is the release of the main net, the timing of which depends on many factors. If you want a flashy feelgood list of whimsical """milestones""" that read like a new age chakra index, go check out OMG's """roadmap""" lmao.
>no new developments Alpha release last month. 6 weeks ahead of deadline.
Jose Hill
Nothing has changed except the price, which is due to the entire market going bearish.
The fundamentals have actually gotten better, the team is getting bigger and they're constantly updating their github.
If you think smart contracts will be big, Link will be big
Jack Thompson
We told you autists yesterday that if you show up to SXSW and anger Sergey he will market dump his link. And what do you do? Take a picture with him with a fucking biz sign.
Cameron Allen
That's sucks user, donate your linkies to others before going to Vojakhalla
>They're still developing, major partnerships right now would make very little sense.
AKA they have nothing to show and no official partnerships. I don’t care if they are “in talks” that means nothing. I realize now the chainlink presentation picture with Swift was the equivalent of the OMG skateboard.
The team released alpha which barely sparked interest and mainnet beta/production could be years away. We know nothing as of now, the only reason to hold is blind hope that they announce something in the next year which we both know they won’t do.
Game over, the memes were fun but, that’s all they ever were.
Charles James
>AKA they have nothing to show and no official partnerships Startups that are still developing don't typically have many official partnerships. Chainlink does have a few notable ones, though.
And the word "partnership" is a crypto meme. Chainlink is a decentralized project, it has users. Not "partners" as such.
>I don’t care if they are “in talks” that means nothing Exactly. Yet many cryptos out there like to flaunt their "in talks with" as partnerships. Chainlink doesn't do that, which is a very good thing.
>I realize now the chainlink presentation picture with Swift was the equivalent of the OMG skateboard. That's because you're an idiot.
Jackson Reed
What's so fucking difficult? Jeez, I don't know. Maybe believing that I will get rich in 1 year when everything points in the opposite direction?
William Allen
Reminder that there is literally a "ChainLink Investment Fund" with at least 2.5 million.
Also even if you want to sell, selling in a bear market is retarded
Christopher Thomas
That has nothing to do with the Chainlink token.
Aaron Brown
hahaha are you crying because you weren't there and another user got a picture with the serg?
nothing has changed and the conference wasn't a complete fail, what the fuck are you even talking about? Just because it didn't go as YOU expected it haha You're such a puss
Robert Cox
They have an official partnership with Zeppelin OS which is an OS geared solely to individuals making smart contracts. They are still in the early phase but manage billions worth every day. They will be using Link as the SOLE PROVIDER OF EXTERNAL DATA TO THEIR CONTRACTS. That's just one of their confirmed official partnerships. Req will be using Chainlink, after Oraclize went down many companies were looking at Chainlink, the head of the fucking IMF mentioned SmartContract.com personally. That's not a partnership but it's pretty fucking big.
What happened:
>Veeky Forums is full of pathetic children who thought some panel discussion was a huge event >They hyped it up like it was a massive thing >They got mad after it was nothing >BTC is shitting itself so that made everything worse for Link >The devs are busy on git with the mainnet so there's really not much else to do >The price literally means nothing at this point is all just speculation
Look through the archives and the conclusion drawn back when we discussed it
Leo Gray
I was there when this "news" came out. It has nothing at all to do with the token.
Nolan Evans
hm.... put it like this Link will never, ever pass its all time high again The market may get another pump sure, but that thing that happened in 2017 That's not happening again, you have to be a complete fucking moron to think the market is getting pumped that hard again And the only way the coin that no one knows about will get pumped that hard again is when this market forms a bubble I'm buying some coins that have devs that can really shill, and has massive hype I want money
Brody Lewis
>tfw holding 30k link and comfy because I never planned to sell before a year anyways cause I don't want to pay short term taxes.
Same here actually. My country taxes 0% if you invest "prudently"; i.e. long-term hodling (over 1 year) and no speculative trading.
Noah Morales
Literally has the word crypto Capitalizes L in ChainLink Investors are involved in tech sector
There was a lot more, can't find atm because phone posting
Jackson Jenkins
Damn, here in the states it's like 15% after a year holding.
Probably 25% if I make millions though.
Samuel Peterson
partnerships don't mean shit and half assed announcements of "maybe partnerships" hurt any project more than they do good
Benjamin Stewart
Nothing to do with the token.
They named it chainlink, yet denied any involvement with the token. If they had copied the name of the token, they wouldn't be coy about it.
They just chose that name because it's a common and cool name that refers to blockCHAIN.
Levi Murphy
>They are still in the early phase but manage billions worth every day. They will be using Link as the SOLE PROVIDER OF EXTERNAL DATA TO THEIR CONTRACTS.
This is all inaccurate. 99% of zeppelin OS's billions are contracts representing scam tokens and overpriced vapor ware that represents far less fiat than the market caps of the coins. No serious legacy finance companies are writing smart contracts with the public ethereum blockchain.
Chainlink will be the DEFAULT oracle not the exclusive one. Oraclize will remain by far the cheapest option with api calls costing only 1c a piece compared to chainlink which will be several times more expensive.
Request MIGHT use chainlink and it itself might fail to become big which is very possible.
Klaus Schwaub has a one line throwaway about it in his book because his ghost writer was lazy and literally typed "smartcontract.com" into the address bar, there is otherwise no indication he knows or cares about chainlink.
Chainlink is like any other token. It will probably fail.
>yet denied any involvement with the token show me where they denied it
Carter Cox
>denied any involvement
I'm gonna need proof for that
ChainLink is "not" a common name referring to blockchain, wtf are you talking about
Noah Ortiz
People of the chainlink fund visited Sergeys Linkedin page repeatedly
Alexander Bell
Why have a fund that invests in Link but denies that it invests in Link? That makes no sense. If they denied investing in Link, then they likely are telling the truth.
Chase White
LINK MARINES Everyone ITT sounds like a bunch of broken souls The fundamentals have not changed. It was due for a dump after this conference, nothing besides a docusign partnership could have prevented that.
NONE of us even heard what they said in the panel due to lack of streams.
Link will dump to .28 as that is the whale target. No need to cry and whimper. This was always a hold until mainnet and beyond.
Have you wanted 10K link? If it dumps to .10 you can get it for just $1000! Look at the bright side. No need to grumble like a jaded roastie.
Nolan Hughes
someone called and they denied it.
How retarded do you have to be to believe that someone would name their hedge fund after the literal product name.
There are at least two other blockchain related entities with the name chainlink and chainlink crypto fund makes three. Chainlink Research and Chainlink some blockchain identity company. It's just a word you faggots.
William Lee
All of this is going to be handled on chain by EOS without fees
chainlink will bleed hard for months but thats good i can buy more cheap
Lincoln Edwards
um, yeah. i do.
Noah Sanchez
I'm searching through the archives, but this was a while ago. Feel free to get in touch with them and ask.
And there is no way someone would create an investment fund for a specific token without coming right out in support of said token. Yet they haven't uttered a word.
"Chainlink" is just a cool-sounding word that relates to block"chain".
Brody Campbell
Glad that you guys are being a bit more serious again and with less memes. Most of those who have done well on the big bears believe in the tech but you have to learn to adapt. If you really consider yourself an investor in a market you have to learn to adapt.
Gets more complex than pic related but general idea.
nope, OracleChain is basically a chainlink clone on EOS because EOS does not have oracles natively either.
Mason Baker
Reddit is even pissed now because the official Chainlink subreddit just copied the theme from the Linktrader subreddit.
Logan Parker
I'll look through it myself.
Aiden Jones
Feeling great love when there's a bloodbath it feels good to see my port -34k I can't wait to add to my stack to move up in the wallet rankings. My goal is to be in top 100 wallets. Honestly if Sergey would just move on and everyone abandon ship it would make my life easier. I'd accumulate link even if the project was completely over
