Prove me wrong that 97% of climate change scientists are not in fact suffering from the bandwagon effect...

You want us to prove that 97 % of climate change scientists are suffering from the bandwagon effect, peer pressure and group think?

That's impossible to do, even if it were true.

Other big environmental problem winch is real unlike global warming is space junk. Space junk is going to be a very big problem pretty soon, because day by day more satellites are launched, but when the satellite stop working/is not needed it become space junk orbiting the Earth at incredibility high speed. This space junk can slow the spatial exploration, and if we do nothing there is going to be too much space junk orbiting around earth that we are not going to be able to launch more satellites or spaceships because they are going to get destroyed by this space junk. Although countries are working on high power lasers to destroy this junk, but these lasers have second intentions that governments don't say and it's communication war (lasers can't shut down or even destroy enemies satellites), they are also creating missiles with orbital range or satellites armed with nukes or ballistic missiles, so if they work on it they can solve space junk problems, but no, the UN prefer to focus in global warming to get some good money for penalty fees.
Well, I'm part of the Ministry of Agriculture of some European country, I'm telling you that because I know what I'm talking about.

Regardless of whether or not climate change/global warming exists, why shouldn't measures be taken to reduce pollution? Pollution has immediate tangible effects beyond making it hotter/colder/whatever.

>Other big environmental problem winch is real
Which is real*
>This space junk can slow the spatial exploration
space exploration*
Sorry for the typos I'm working right now and gotta type fast. We are making the inform of the year 2016, so we are pretty busy in the Ministry of Agriculture. We need to inform about quality of food, economic spendings, ecosystem... We do more things that just talk about veggies, so if somebody wants to know more about ecosystem you can ask, but I will answer tomorrow

>why shouldn't measures be taken to reduce pollution?

why shouldn't measures be taken to reduce pollution?

What makes you think we're not. We've just about killed our economy trying to mitigate it already.

It doesn't effect temperature distribution within the atmosphere nor the outgoing radiation from the earth.

Litteraly the only reason climate change is a debate is because of the Koch brothers chokehold on the right

>It doesn't effect temperature distribution
It makes the average temperature higher.

>nor the outgoing radiation from the earth.
It lessens the outgoing radiation by absorbing infrared heat radiating from the earth and re-emitting some of it back towards the earth.

>Well, I'm part of the Ministry of Agriculture of some European country, I'm telling you that because I know what I'm talking about.
But you don't.

>Prove me wrong that 97% of climate change scientists are not in fact suffering from the bandwagon effect, peer pressure and group think in order to push this global warming meme.

Prove me wrong that 97% of rightwing fundie faggots are not in fact suffering from the bandwagon effect, peer pressure and group think in order to push this science denial meme.