I have a large stake in LINK on the off chance that they pull off their plan.
What I don't understand is, why is the team so small, when their goal is so significant and valuable to the entire cryptoassets space? Their are other, low value, simple projects with literally 10x the personnel.
Would more people not get them moving along quicker, or is their something my tiny brain doesn't get?
Additionally, why are their no true rivals trying to create a decentralised oracle
>why is the team so small They don't want to share when they exit scam > why are their no true rivals Cos they are trying to solve a glorified no-problem
David Scott
>on the off chance that they pull off their plan. You think these 2 guys have a plan? Tell me about their plan then. kek
Jaxson White
I would rather start a business with 5 lions vs 500 lambs
Wyatt White
Good analogy, also you don't want too many cooks in the kitchen.
Carter White
surely a lot of the work can be delegated to lesser team members with oversight at this stage.
Parker Sanchez
if you want to solve global problem, it's not possible for few
Lucas Hall
They released the alpha testnet *ahead of schedule* absolutely fine with the current number of team members.
Landon Lee
>nice larp 4/10 I refuse to believe that anybody could be stupid enogh to buy this glorified erc20 token.
Charles Taylor
This, chainlink is not needed
Grayson Rivera
Imagine being such a brainlet that you would actually believe that they only have 2 people on their team. There's obviously some heavy NDA shit at work, so you're never going to know until they feel like telling you. They don't pander to people on twitter, or telegram, or any other shit you can think of. They don't give a shit about you. They're courting the foundations of big money / big business - we are largely irrelevant but we can still pick up their pocket change.
Eli Perez
Crashing /biz, with no survivors.
Nathaniel Scott
Why do medical teams only have one or two MDs? Wouldn’t they be able to accomplish more if each team had 20 of them?
Justin Harris
>why are their no true rivals trying to create a decentralised oracle
Because the further you look into it, the more issues that arise. Also see pic related, do you understand it?? No? Neither does the vast majority of people, including a lot of those that claim to be programmers.
If you holding coin, can't not be rational about it. This is because your vision will be clouded. Delusional vision, basically same as living in fantasy world
William Murphy
There is a potential rival, Witnet
Brandon Thomas
Your pajeet is showing
Chase Brown
Ah, the classic norman thinking of "why don't big companies just hire 1000 coders to get everything done in 1 day dur" the answer is because more people does not equal more efficient work when it comes to computer projects
Ryan Walker
thanks, basically want I wanted to know
Tyler Clark
le mythical man month le 10x engineer xD
Jayden Hughes
Good one
Easton Murphy
There are competitors already that have surpassed chainlink
Camden Edwards
They obviously have a larger team not directly in the project
Cooper Russell
Wintnet is years behind though. Plus the CEO is a soy boy.
Blake Williams
Can they be a legitimate competitor once their product is out though? The market should be big enough for multiple oracles
Kevin Morales
Just fucking fuck off newfag.
Robert Robinson
it doesnt matter who they are. what matters is their plan
Carson Collins
>who are Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak >who is Bill Gates >who is Jeff Bezos
Matthew Scott
they can but their testnet is 2 years away, chainlink will probably release on mainnet this year it will be like ETH vs NEO or EOS, chainlink will absolutely dominate the oracle space
Hudson Ward
Sergey spent all the money on Big Macs and Thailand ladyboys. Chainlink is fucked
this is how you recognize a high quality whitepaper
Jaxon Phillips
>mcdonalds that's very clearly in-n-out, fren
Grayson Walker
They have to keep the team small, they only received $32,000,000 in ETH and only own the majority of all Link. Who is going to pay for additional staff?
Ian Campbell
>if you want to solve global problem, it's not possible for few
Satoshi Nakamoto worked alone and with Dave Kleiman, Nick Szabo, Hal Finney and Gavin Andresen.. The bitcoin team wasn't 1,000 people. Sergey apparently is the brain behind LINK. Not the only ones doing smart contracts.
Evan White
muh army of 400 pajeet codemonkey will deliver the next big project >ok
