Prove him wrong.
Protip: you can
Prove him wrong
Other urls found in this thread:
evolution.berkeley.edu
twitter.com
>implying that the earth is a closed thermodynamic system.
This. Don't forget about our big fusion reactor. It emits the energy that ultimately drives all living processes on earth (except for perhaps some deepsea extromophiles that are chemotrophs). It emits energy as visible light, light is used to drive some reactions and is converted by photsynthetic organisms into carbohydrates using H, C and O, the stored energy of which is used to make other complex macromolecules (amino/nucleic/fatty acids) that have given rise to enzymes to catalyze normally nonspontaneous reactions, leading to a more complex system of chemical reactions that is an organism. That organism emits heat the whole time, and may sometimes pass on genes to offspring. Those genes can undergo mutations, leading to different developements to maintain the organism system in a different, potentially more niche way. I'm not a smart cookie, but that's the gist of it. I wouldn't mind if someone corrected me or elaborated more. I'm just an undergrad who wants a decent job and doesn't usually concern himself with such matters.
no, it doesn't
where in the 2nd law does it say that entropy always locally increases at every step? where does it say that there can't be some intermediate step where entropy decreases in some local region?
>mfw took bait
i want to kill dumb motherfuckers like that inbred piece of shit. they are ruining the achievements of generations passed with their distorted "logic" if such disgusting behavior can ever be deemed as such
correct.
>does not the second law of thermodynamics disprove the concept of creation?
what achievements? a theory? has the discovery/study of evolution contributed to modern technology?
ftr I'm an agnostic as well but I think you're just mad because you're emotionally attached to macroevolution
does this guy even understand thermodynamics? the entropy argument is supposed to challenge the idea of organization, not energy. arguing about energy wouldn't even make sense since most of it comes from the sun
Are you from /r/atheism? Please go back.