Leave mathematics to me!--t.mochizuki

>leave mathematics to me!--t.mochizuki

Imagine getting one of the signs wrong in that

except that's from Alain Connes

how do you even grasp what's written here?

If you know what kinds of particles are in the standard model and how they interact it isn't that difficult to put it together.

PEMDAS NIGGA

what the fuck is this from, and why is it so god damn ugly.

I'ts Schlodingers Formula to hiz pu$$ycat!

>Veeky Forums doesn't recognise the pinnacle of modern physics

Is there any introduction to the standard model written for mathematicians?

the elegance of all of the generalizations of classical physics to higher order theories leads me to believe that the massive shitpile that is the standard model is just a special case of a more general, more beautiful thing

is this a common feeling or just
>math major tries to think about physics

>Is there any introduction to the standard model written for mathematicians?

Noncommutative Geometry and Particle Physics by Walter D. van Suijlekom

Well it is supposed to have context

What the fuck is this? Does it even have meaning?

It's literally bullshit. Just a mishmash of a bunch of equations that is completely meaningless. Wow, the linear combination of some random physical laws gives us some super special magic number. What a load of garbage. This is why nobody takes physicists seriously.

standard model of particle physics

you should probably commit sudoku bro

I have this same feeling, so I guess you're right
(I'm a math major too, heh)

It is the Lagrangian for the entire standard model.

It should be denoted though that not all terms in there are physical. Some are gauge fixing terms.

Thanks!

Why? I'm right.

every physics major and teacher that I've ever spoken to about these things believes this as well
granted that is anecdotal and i've only had had this conversation with a few dozen people, but still...