Was he right?

About what?

This is a textbook case of someone who's a genius at one thing thinking it means he's automatically right about everything and ending up with retarded views. See also: newton believing in alchemy and nontrinitarian christian mysticism, Chomsky being a retarded pro-commie, or Dawkins thinking philosophy is bullshit.

always give me a little kek

Dafuq...

Chomsky, on the same scale as Newton ?

Newton was a deep and proud christian, like every scientist who made great things in maths and physics.

>or Dawkins thinking philosophy is bullshit.
And that's wrong???

bump

Like so many before him, he is good at identifying problems in society but not so great at prescribing a viable and realistic solution.

At least he tried, unlike Marx.

You mean the opposite. Marx has provided the only viable and realistic alternative to capitalism available until today. It might be too early for communism, but still, you better hope he's right.

>Communism
>Viable
>Realistic