theguardian.com
Is it over?
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
thanks just bought 100k hoping to get some pizza with it
>"child abuse" and "illegal content" in the URL
yeah not clicking that
>the guardian
yeah not clicking that
They found a fatal flaw. Pack it up boys, we're done. So what's our next get rich quick scheme?
you sick fuck!
get some hotdogs instead
better safe than sorry, gramps.
>bitcoin
Yeah not clicking that
here you fucking pussy
>hot dogs?
Yeah, not clicking that.
pedo pics on BTC chain ?
Fucking A!
this is pure FUD, there has been CP in the bitcoin blockchain since 2012. it's literally nothing, by their stupid logic you would have to ban all ones and zeroes because they can be arranged in a certain order to make a child porn image
Also this argument is retarded
>Video cameras become a breakthrough technology
>a small group of people use it to record child pornography while the vast majority use it for documenting life or creating movies
>Therefore, we should ban video cameras all together
exactly, it's also like saying we should ban the internet for the exact same reason
back to penny stocks we go
the ONLY solution is more low skilled immigrants and communism
>by their stupid logic you would have to ban all ones and zeroes because they can be arranged in a certain order to make a child porn image
It's not their logic, it's literally the law
This desu. Also we need lots of Pakistanis. Don't ask me why but they're absolutely critical. Also we have to melt down all guns into big black dildos while baking gay cakes.
>In 2017, far-right Slovak politician Marian Kotleba was criminally charged for donating 1,488 euro to a charity.
top kek
Not comparable, try harder
One should ban a blockchains with CP on it, not all blockchains that can have CP on it. Actuality, not potential.
retards
THIS
same thing with the internet
just because someone uploads cp to the internet doesn't fucking make me responsible.
And every camera bought comes with that cp video?