Holy shit Sir Gay just got absolutely bitchslapped, this must be so humiliating. This well and truly puts an end to the Stinky Linky. Time to dump those heavy ass bags.
CHAINLINK ABSOLUTELY BTFO BY WITNET CHADS
Jeremiah Turner
David Sullivan
Carter Lee
waiting for testnet in late 2019.
yeah, no.
Isaac Powell
Oliver Price
That cuck believed the Veeky Forums fud that nodes can get paid in all ERC20 tokens and not Link
Ryder Sanchez
>muh tokenomics
Kayden Williams
You can’t deny it would’ve been better if Chainlink (LINK) was a token native to its own blockchain.
Juan Cox
why though. the heavy lifting is all done off chain the token isnt doing anything complex enough to need its on blockchain
Hunter White
>"Moreover,"
A sure sign of an idiot
Lincoln Sanders
Also
>Chad
>Calls himself lecturer, amateur ukulele player and politically aware citizen.
Robert Rogers
chainlink is garbage vaporware but even i can deny it
rolling your own blockchain for something that can be done with a token is "not invented here" syndrome at its finest, you're giving up billion dollar security for the illusion of finer control
Julian Davis
I dont understand this at all. What is the point of being on its own chain? The link network already functions separately from its ethereum foundation. You understand that ethereum is just a VM right?
Angel White
Brody Rivera
I don't even hold LINK and this is ridiculous!
>tokenomics
HAHAHAHAHA
Cameron Williams
Spectre has been patched in software. Intel is releasing new hardware in the next months to address the issue permanently.
Nice FUD though.
Carson Johnson
>PoW chain like Ethereum or Bitcoin
Niggers haven't heard of ETH switching to POS soon, haven't they!?
So anoying....
Sebastian Wilson
>muh SGX is vulnerable
>muh ETH won't scale enough to process the tokens
This fud was stale in October 2017.
Jaxson Adams
>soon
never ever
Oliver Scott
underrated
Nicholas Watson
>witnet
Luke Walker
lol wut
Easton Parker
>the "Ethereum has scaling issues and ERC-20 tokens will suffer" FUD all over again
Dominic Harris
>You can’t deny it would’ve been better if Chainlink (LINK) was a token native to its own blockchain.
wrong. Why force people into using a specific blockchain? Nobody knows what will happen with this shit even one week from now, so it is much wiser to be agnostic about it.
Tyler Collins
>politically aware citizen
Why would you even mention this. Is it an achievement to *think* that you're aware what's going on in the political sphere?
Anyone on any part of the political spectrum would feel embarrassment for stating this
Hudson Lee
>havent been on biz in a few weeks
>in the mood for some link fud
>this thread
>"Wit"
>tokenomics
>"Moreover, "
Lmfao the fud is as pathetic and desparate as ever.
Thomas White
(You)
hastily kill yourself
Ryder Cook
we already know link is not reliant on SGX, it's a supplement.
but it's good to know other companies are afraid of LINK, they know its the best
That's why they keep copying it
Easton Bennett
Chainlink BTFO
Jose Adams
if anything, this is a buy signal for chain link. for a company to take time out and try to FUD another is only done out of fear that the FUDDED is prepping to leave it’s competition in the gutter
Eli Myers
Had to look into this project after hearing about it.
Literally as shit as it gets, you fucking brainlet.