Alternative Science Theories?

Old or alternative science theories thread. Different perceptions can be interesting.

Other urls found in this thread:

christies.com/lotfinder/Lot/paul-laffoley-american-b-1940-geochronmechane-5464364-details.aspx
books.google.com/books?id=SdpAB7sbkZwC&pg=PT88&lpg=PT88&dq=Geochronmechane: The Time Machine from the Earth&source=bl&ots=sowIrjm5_8&sig=-9KDVrC_-maQaV0CHp_8tqlLN70&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj9oem7xZXQAhXFiFQKHf4YAE8Q6AEIVTAO#v=onepage&q=Geochronmechane: The Time Machine from the Earth&f=false
youtube.com/watch?v=VYr21sQbuqs
phys.org/news/2016-11-theory-gravity-dark.html
arxiv.org/abs/1611.02269
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

How about TimeTravel?

where does that image com from? I love diagrams like this, I hope it's in a big fancy picture book ic an go buy.

No idea where the image is from, but there's a poster you can buy

christies.com/lotfinder/Lot/paul-laffoley-american-b-1940-geochronmechane-5464364-details.aspx

But as for a better quality, I don't think I was able to find anything better.

Shame there's no better version. Want to know what the "time antenna" did.

Here's the information I could find on that particular diagram.

books.google.com/books?id=SdpAB7sbkZwC&pg=PT88&lpg=PT88&dq=Geochronmechane: The Time Machine from the Earth&source=bl&ots=sowIrjm5_8&sig=-9KDVrC_-maQaV0CHp_8tqlLN70&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj9oem7xZXQAhXFiFQKHf4YAE8Q6AEIVTAO#v=onepage&q=Geochronmechane: The Time Machine from the Earth&f=false

youtube.com/watch?v=VYr21sQbuqs

It seems to be some kind of art mixed in with theory? I'm not sure.

What are these called? Alternative theories? Fringe science theories?

...

...

As long as we're posting this bullshit...

...

>handles the primary reason for amnesia on the whole track

What does this even mean?

What the fuck am I looking at

>string theorists actually believe this

>alternative
OK, how does this "Gordon Model" predict the paramagnetism of diatomic oxygen?

The standard model.

Just released today:
phys.org/news/2016-11-theory-gravity-dark.html

The paper:
arxiv.org/abs/1611.02269

I love how people with superficial knowledge crusade to defeat theories which aren't in vogue

That's not a theory it's a hypothesis.

Layers and layers of abstracted trust. Defending something you didn't prove
with work that isn't yours. Puppet regurgitation, circumscribing the anals of
academia. That's the bitter truth.

But really, that's the best you got? Semantics? I just prodded at your design flaw. Flicked at it with a blade to chip the paint and you want to argue definitions. Density is apparently shallow.