Hi, I have do a proof by induction and I just can't seem to get it. It's the induction step that's tricky.
Not sure on how to write equations here, so I have to prove that [PIC], for every n = {6, 7, 8,...}
Basic step I guess is to show that F_n0 is true, which is F_6. or 8 >= 7.59
Now for the induction step, where I assume that F(k) is true, but where do I start when I have to prove that it also counts for P(k+1)?
Anthony Young
what is Fn tho
Lucas Wright
Oh yeah sorry, forgot to mention that. It's with fibonacci numbers
Cooper Garcia
Its Fibonacci numbers.
You prove the base case where F(n) = 6 which you seem to have already done. Then you need to prove the F(n+1) case which is greater than or equal to (3/2) ^ (n)
You can break down F(n+1) to F(n) + f(n-1) because of the definition of Fibonacci numbers and you can use your assumption that the proof works for all 6,7,8,...,n to prove F(n+1)
Sorry I don't know latex hope this helps.
Jayden Wright
Start off by Substituting N+1 where N is into the equation. In this case, show that the equation with substitution > equation of just N. You have to manipulate the equation/function to show it has the function of the same form, just of [(N+1)-1]=N. In this case the last thing you show is the statement is true for the lowest N integer you consider, which makes it true for all N bigger than it.
Mason Anderson
I've gotten this far, only just reduced it a little. It's what I have to do next I don't really understand
Owen Flores
Use the definition of Fibonacci numbers you posted in this.To break down F(n+1) to F(n) + F(n-1)
Michael Ross
Alright, then I'll have to move F(n-1) somehow right? Isn't my goal to make it match the original statement?
David Wilson
Your goal with the induction step is to show that F(n+1) >= (3/2)^n.
This is generally done by changing things on the left side of the equation to match the right side of the equation. In this case after substituting F(n) + F(n-1) in for F(n+1), you use the fact that you proved the base case and are assuming the original formula holds for all 6, 7, 8, ... , n.
By doing this, you can substitute F(n) with (3/2)^(n-1) and F(n-1) with (3/2)^(n-2). And you do some algebra to show that this is less than or equal to (3/2)^n.
Landon Barnes
Ill try working on it with this in mind. How is it that I can substitute F(n-1) with (3/2)^(n-2)?