What nonfiction/science books have red pilled you?

What nonfiction/science books have red pilled you?

Explain what they red pilled you on.

For me it's The Selfish Gene and The Extended Phenotype. Red pilled me on biology. The most interesting part of the extend phenotype was when the author was discussing how some organisms have genes for controlling the behavior of other organisms.

Lots of people seem to dislike Dawkins. I don't know if it's because of his involvement with atheists, or because they legitimately believe his writings on biology and evolution are bad.

>reads a book and thinks he knows shit
>uses the term "red pilled"
ugh grow up already you manchild

sage

>Uses the term manchild

Hello cuck, did you type this at chads apartment while you were streaming him fucking your wife at your house?.

>popsci

gtfo and read a freshman textbook

You should know that when you talk to people who actually know their stuff, when they close the conversation with a smile and a laugh they know that continuing the conversation is pointless because they already know they won't like you anyway.

I'm sorry user. People are not mentally equal. You can play your little game where you pretend that you're clever, and maybe you'll even get your friends to play along, if have any. Regardless, in the end you're only fooling yourself.

You didn't list any books faggot.

is this knowledge gained from experience?

lol you might as well have read fiction.
Dawkins is a joke in the scientific community.

>muh entry level books are popular and so they are wrong meme
>scientific community according to my fav prof and 3 friends.

What is it specifically that people dislike about Dawkins? People always say he's wrong but never elaborate on what he's wrong about.