Why is nuclear energy so bad? I'm pretty sure my country (Switzerland), France...

Why is nuclear energy so bad? I'm pretty sure my country (Switzerland), France, and Germany use it extremely successfully. You can occasionally even see these radioactive waste treatment centers from the highway.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=pVbLlnmxIbY
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

It isn't. It's just fear mongering by lobby groups that affects people who aren't educated on the topic.

I agree with you but then why do so called "educational channels" like kurzgesagt state otherwise?

It depends a lot on how it's regulated and how the companies maintaining the plants behave.

>France, and Germany use it extremely successfully

Germany is phasing it out. France's Areva Corp who is the state-monopoly for Nuclear is bankrupt and requires billions of taxpayer money to stay solvent.

Until Nuclear becomes cheaper it will stay dead. Some options:

1. Higher Efficiency turbines. Super-critical or Brayton cycle turbines can bring efficiency to +40%

2. Cheaper Fuels. Switching to lower enriched Uranium or Thorium can dramatically bring down costs by being more abundant and require little/lower processing.

3. Compact designs and Digital Controls. Self explanatory.

4. Standardization on fewer models. Stop trying to create a zoo with each reactor having unique and special supplier requirements.


All of these proposals are being worked on with Generation IV reactors.

I work in the united states nuclear industry, right now here is a mandatory push towards normalizing the procedural work and unifying the plants so that consultants can have some similarity between plants. The hope of this is to reduce costs of major projects by having a common process industry wide.

We'll see how much it really helps

Areva Corp is having problems because 2008 recession, fukushima, and problems with sand monkeys in north africa.

France pays 18 cents per kwh, compared to 35 cents in Germany.

It's not bad. It's demonized by pseudo-environmentalists because anything that doesn't come from nature = bad

Here in Switzerland nuclear energy costs twice as much as it would cost to buy energy from germany. It's being phased out by 2050 but some people are pushing for a vote to get rid of it sooner.
I think it has its importance due to its strategical role in making us energy self-reliant, but very expensive

As a suede o scientist I think nuclear is not a valid "green" energy source because of the complications around its explosive radioactivity. When there is a problem it is fucking huge and more or less permanently fucks shit up.
Why can we not utilise more wind turbines, geothermal, solar, magnetic Tesla magic?