How come there are only 3 possible explanations for abiogenesis, "Primordial Soup" "Replication First (RNA World)" and "Metabolism First" and they have all been disproved.
How come there are only 3 possible explanations for abiogenesis...
Thomas Perry
Other urls found in this thread:
studytoanswer.net
scientificamerican.com
creation.com
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
quantamagazine.org
sciencedaily.com
twitter.com
Dominic Gutierrez
How have they been disproved? Not being deliberately obtuse, genuinely curious.
Tyler Barnes
please explain how RNA world has been disproved
Jaxon Rodriguez
"Primordial Soup" -
studytoanswer.net
"RNA World" - scientificamerican.com
"Metabolism First" - creation.com
Ignore the websites, but they have good facts.
Cooper Johnson
>study to answer
>creation.com
You seriously believe everything you read?
Jason Turner
>OP doesn't know of the protein world hypothesis aka the great juju's menstrual flood
Adam Hernandez
>ignore the fact that creation.com does nothing in science, uses nothing to do with any scientific shit at all and only believes and publishes shit from "scientists" that support their retarded "science"
>but they got good "facts" tho
Joshua James
the specific sites I listed do have good information.
Zachary Sanchez
RNA can function as an enzyme as well as an information molecule.
Isaac Ramirez
>creation.com
not biased at all