Can crime be stopped by science?

>Can we create a science approved Pre-Crime Unit?

The liberals would never let this happen. Dream on OP.

Kill everyone else until only I remain.

This is very infuriating. Libs are killing the American spirit.

They would definitely need to create a strong check and balance system for this, I agree desu...

I thought Trump wasn't liberal

>pre crime unit
Real world isnt an anime, son.

They still protest anything that's not benefiting them directly. Example stupid Black Lives Matter supporters who's supporting people that clearly break the law.

You should watch the, "Crime and Oracle" episode of Futurama. The creators of the show gave good reason as to why a pre-crime unit would not work.

I know right? Nothing can get done because they control the house, senate, executive, the courts, oh... wait...

Ok will do my intellectual user.

so what? they don't control anything directly now. /you/ are the establishment now, it's kind of cheap to rage against the broken machine

Just stop thinking, that would be great for the rest of us. Thank fuck you.

>pol is here gain

wat

>SJWtards are disgusted by people taking a stand against crime.
I want this """pol""" to be on every board.

>SJWtard
you forgot gif related

LMAO!!! I voted for my superior soon to be President Trump.

thx :^)

No

Statistical tools cannot be used on individuals

You can massively violate peoples rights to watch and listen to them 24/7. There will be an enormous decrease in crime rates if the higher ups aren't corrupt as well but you'd be trading off the whole worlds privacy.

>the republicans have blocked every attempt by the CDC to do an epidemiological study on gun crime
>literally the only thing that would give predictive power to any model for any attempt to reduce gun crime
>predictive modelling being literally the closest thing to pre-crime without actual precognition
FUCKING SJWS AMIRITE

Sorry, I meant, "Law and Oracle."

Don't pretend that isn't already true - even to an extent

>>the republicans have blocked every attempt by the CDC to do an epidemiological study on gun crime
No because it's not in the power of the CDC to study those things

The Fbi already made several gun crime studies over the course of the 1994 assault weapon ban and again in the late 2000's when Obama was hearing up for the 2013 assault weapon ban (that failed btw) and found that the bans did literally nothing to stop, prevent or reduce gun crime at all

Conservatards and the whiteys are guilty of the gun fascination menace in America and their easy distribution among the people
Libtards and nignogs are guilty of committing mass crime waves and trying to censor the life-saving statistical criminal profile due to "JUS CUZ HE BLACK" cancer

None of you are innocent.

do you actually know where that term is from?

Liberals crimes are excusing violence because it happens to fit their narrative. Conservatives crimes are wanting to uphold fundamental human rights. You can pick which one is worse.

Ok you're just the benchmark of stupidity

wtf i hate white people now

>Buy the new COD game every year
You're not human if you don't do that. You're literally subhuman filth no matter what race you are.

Naruto

I'm White from Texas actually with a Phd in Math. So fuck you!!

Don't know where race comes in but okay, buddy.

Easily, just make a virus that targets only nigs.

Crime almost completely eradicated

Seriously, all jokes aside.

Imagine being born non-white. I'd probably kill myself

jesus christ how old are you? please tell me you're kidding

They are sooooo white. I love them so dearly.

I love this, this SJW movie actually presents very well my view of social justice.

Racial minorities? Totally fine, lets be friends and lets be equal.

Non-christians? Sure, I'm not a christian myself so lets be friends.

LGBT people? Sure, you do what you want my man.

non binary? Ehh, you are kinda pushing it but desu I don't care so if I know your preferred pronouns I'll use it.

Fat people? No, fuck you. You disgusting piece of shit.

Look at that movie poster. The two black women look determined, strong and have an aura of strong leadership.

The fat woman? Her face looks like MEEP.

Like she is high or something. Fat people are incapable of showing any kind of skill at anything, even acting. It is like someone told the three women "For this shot you have to look like badasses!" and then the fat girl fucked up, as expected of fat thrash but the SJW movie studio was too ashamed to even ask her to do another shot.

Lol, fat people all deserve to die.

I'm 45

watch Minority Report.

They already have a working protoype for that.

We can't get rid of all crime but if we sterilized every race except for asians and whites there would be much less crime, a better distribution of resources, and a higher standard of living for us all.

Asians are mostly communist and are reproducing at an alarming rate. Keep in mind, most of them are strong leftist with Japan being the only country who lean more neutral. Places like Taiwan and other Asian countries are shit holes. When you say Asians are good, you're talking about the Japanese and they're only good because America backed millions into them.

Whites have been at the forefront of wars and controlling and manipulating various corporations that effect the world. While this isn't as bad as "street thugs", we're judging from a perspective of the elites who dictate what's right or wrong.

Is that what theyre calling the FBI Crime Statistics now?

>Whites have been at the forefront of wars and controlling and manipulating various corporations that effect the world.

If you consider jews white, then yes this is correct.

So basically the Jews are our real overlords and whites are not a special race? White nationalists are useful idiots who are allowed to think they've done something special, when really they're like labor mules?

b-but i want 4 kids

yes

Are you talking about government sanctioned prejudice? AKA racism

We have a realistic and functioning pre-crime system set up. It's called conspiracy to commit a crime which is based on evidence of intent and preparation to commit a crime. What more do you want?

Seeing as blacks would be targeted much more often than any other race there would be accusations of racism, and probably something something white-privilege.

also Psycho-Pass delves deep into the realistic ethical issues in pre-crime units.

One example of such is using statistics on a group of people to measure the likely hood of committing a crime. Simply being near that group increases your likely hood of being a criminal, thus making crime an contagious disease.
People, enemies or political figures, could intentionally be forced into being statistically prone criminals through a conspiracy or collusion of outside forces out of their control.

> Build civilizations.

Do you morons know that none of the early civilizations were primarily white ?

> America backed millions into them

You mean after nuking them. FU americunts.

And there are countries like India where shitty Right wing lunatic bastards are ruling.

>Asians are mostly communist
Get out, Unruhe

You know pre crime comes from a story about how it doesn't work, right?

Just put everyone in jail.

100% of crimes stopped.

shitposting and /pol/esmoker b8 aside, the closest we will probably come to it is using machine learning together with tons of data about individuals. I wouldn't be surprised if this is what the NSA has been working on.

I feel like this would be okay if we use the data to deter people from committing crime. I feel like if we find someone is predisposed to committing a crime (IE antisocial) and then cut off their access to the rest of society (like increasing police presence in their neighborhood, quarantining their neighborhood, or any other method of cutting them off and ostracizing them) that we will just end up pushing people to crime and our predictors will just end up getting fed information with a confirmation bias.

You would call the machine "polesmoker" as well after it shows the persistent ethnicities of the criminals like the dumbfuck you are. Thats why nobody cares about the opinions of crime fascinated libtards on anything.

>triggered

you really are ;)

I feel like using precrime analysis to stop criminals wont stop crime. It will just breed criminals who can pass the analysis methods. We are going to end up with a slew of super careful sociopaths running around committing crimes and we wont be able to identify them. People will always get mad, depressed, or have needs that need to be tended to that society is not helping them with. These people will always be willing to commit a crime for revenge or to survive. They are just going to start masterminding their moves instead of being blatant about the crimes they commit.

>we wuz kingzz

God that girl in your pic looks infuriating dude. Who is that?

Nope, if I knew that then I wouldn't have commented on the episode I watched on Futurama.

It wouldn't surprise me if they took elements from the story and incorporated it into their episode. That's what they usually do.

However, I am now curious as to what story you're speaking of.

/pol/esmoker:
>It's dem brown people wat are the criminals

Veeky Forumslon:
>After training the model on over over 9,0000 petabytes of data consisting of millions of features, we can deduce that these 50 features are the most important in determining if an individual is about to commit a violent crime. Moreover 30 of them are live biometric data consisting of stuff like heart rate and blood pressure.

This is getting good boyos

It's happening m8s!!!

>Meanwhile lets ignore the alarmingly proportional correlation between dark skin color and crime rates.
Let me know when that extreme AI comes into existence. We'll be using statistical analysis, gang affiliation, cultural influences, geo-profiling and background checks until that happens, no matter how much dem brown people tend to fall under that profile.

under rated post right here

>reminder that china's new state credit bureau will penalize you for associating with dissidents

Life follows animu

Correlation does not imply causation. It may simply be the fact that an overwhelming number of darker skin folk have been dealt a shittier hand or grow up exposed to shittier culture with low education. Plus if they were directly correlated with crime, crime rates would have increased following population growth among those communities since the 1990s rather than have fallen as it has.

>own all social mediums used to mock them

goy pls

...

>technocrats

yes...the A.I. tornated be strong and be quick!

...

> black or white fallacy

Please tell me you see the irony of this post user.

...

black people invented language so they have the reserved right to dismantle it if they so choose

Tbh it's pretty cap worthy.

>alarming rates
What? This is statistically untrue

The CDC can study whatever it likes and can come to whatever conclusions it likea. It cannot use those conclusions to push for gun control. They were caught red-handed doing that, so they had their federal funding for gun studies moved to traumatic brain injuries.

It's called Psycho-Pass.

Maybe we here at Veeky Forums should do it for shits and giggles. Like we amass raw data from all of our local/state precincts related to gun violence and find out the real numbers ourselves? I'd be down to do this over winter break if others are willing to join.

In principle, yes, Nature herself is the greatest illegitimate coercive authority of all, and generates much of the fundamental material conditions which shape the course of history. Failing to recognize this was Kaczynski's principal theoretical weakness.
But the transhumanist position is irredeemably utopian and often clung to not by working scientists but by popsci reddit "science fan" types with more enthusiasm than knowledge or theory.

Fuck you racist.

The outcome of that would be extremely racist.
If you ever tried to use those findings in anyway, you'd never find a job again

You're a prejudiced guy

Or we'd determine that it goes beyond race. We could look for statistical correlates by asking our departments for anonymized data they might have regarding blood alcohol content, blood pressures, mental illness, economic class, education, home neighborhood of suspects, etc.

You can't demarcate individuals as possible criminals effectively because anyone can commit an egregious crime, without prior, trackable notice.

You can't make a machine that recognises criminals because there is no such thing as 'a criminal'. There are only people who may or may not commit crimes, and there are legal activities that have more serious consequences than some crimes.

E T E R N A L
T
E
R
N
A
L

That's why we need a scientific pre-crime unity my brainless friend. Kek.

>trump is assassinated
>congress reacts by creating pre-crime unit to stop all crime before it happens
>Pence sworn into office
>99% of the population get arrested for the pre-crime of viewing illegal content on the internet
>pence later declares viewing pornography is illegal

They were saying there isn't a scientific way to evaluate precrime.