This type of people make me sick

this type of people make me sick

Other urls found in this thread:

philpapers.org/archive/SHATVO-2.pdf
physics.ohio-state.edu/~jay/880/moreisdifferent.pdf
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

scientologist detected

you mean scientist (a follower of the church of scientism)

Philosophy should stay out of science. Stick to your own problems, philosofags. For example work on new arguments to justify genocide.

sciensologist (a science cult member who narrow-mindedly worships science and puts his blind faith in scientific cardinals)

Well lad, there is trouble when people worship the institutions and people that do science instead of realizing that science is but a method of inquiry letting them get away with bad science for whatever sinister, profitable or lulz purpose they seek.
This is for you pop sci journalists too.

>justify
What is there to justify in a reality where there are no objective rights and wrongs? Big fish eats small fish and we relentlessly consume until our time ends on this mortal playground.

>i have never even come across the term 'scientism'

o

kay

For most people, science is a religion though. It's not like they've investigated everything themselves, but they're still confident enough to say anyone who disagrees with the current consensus is an idiot.

For most people, faith in modern science relies on little more than an appeal to authority.

But logical positivism IS dead, user.

maybe i didnt get the meaning of the comic. Im not a philosophy reader nor a fan.
I dont like what the guy from the left side said

The guy on the left is supposed to be saying reasonable stuff that the guy on the right "hand-waves" away. I think. It's a very shitty comic.

it was made simple for normies to understand

why is the guy on the right twitching?

>destroyed half a century ago
No. Mathematics still exists

Ideas don't die
People die
Simply because the created died does not mean the creation dies with it

You mean a scientismist

>i dont know what logical positivism is

Kill yourself.

Who are you quoting?

Well you are. People advocating for climate change without looking at the evidence doesn't mean the evidence isn't there. Trusting what most scientists say without verifying is much better than denying what they say without verifying. The former is based on trust while the latter is willful ignorance.

Nice rebuttal!

I'm pretty sure he's miming jerking off. The rest of the comics with that character in it usually involve a punchline with him either pissing or jerking off.
I don't think it's trying to present the whole "HURR SCIENCE IS A MYTH" group as right.

>but they're still confident enough to say anyone who disagrees with the current consensus is an idiot.
That's a very anti-intellectual position for a scientist to have.

Before making up stupid words for something, maybe spend thirty seconds checking if there's already one in use?

are you literally retarded

>It's not like they've investigated everything themselves
We actually have a specific system of ethics for exactly this, as there are serious practical limitations on the total amount of work one person can do.

Awww yeaaaa my niggas been reading Shackel

philpapers.org/archive/SHATVO-2.pdf
philpapers.org/archive/SHATVO-2.pdf
philpapers.org/archive/SHATVO-2.pdf
philpapers.org/archive/SHATVO-2.pdf

Sciensologist apologist detected

Many outside the sciences seem to chronically underestimate the nature and scope of what we might call "emergent properties" as well - insofar as they may, in so doing, conveniently misinterpret material reductionist arguments about the "nature of reality."
physics.ohio-state.edu/~jay/880/moreisdifferent.pdf

The crisis of society itself is unexplainable without the tools of historical materialism, consistently and oftentimes spectacularly so. Marx had it about as right as anyone could.

>I am implying that I could easily vanquish you should I ever decide to degrade myself by considering your point
>be thankful that I am as tactful as I am rational
>p-please?

if u are responding to me (OP) please I want to clarify that I DISSAGRE with what the guy talking on the comic said. The comment I made was misleading. I do not agree with this pseudo-philosophycal rants people have againts science and as soon as they throw word-salads like this I just tell them that I cant argue with such an stupid point.

Also you can investigates someones work if you find that it's unbelivable and they will have (hopefully) posted a referenced paper and emperical data set. (You won't find on those in the back of a bible. JS)
Also what this guy said

You can't escape the Christian cult

>SEXUAL GESTURES LOLREKT

What the fuck does the guy on right is doing on the 2nd panel?

Anyway philosofags, could you stay away from here, you literally have 3 fucking boards for this shit
But you better go to the first 2 so you don't kill the smart people on the 3rd just like you did here

if u are responding to me (OP) please I want to clarify that I DISSAGRE with what the guy talking on the comic said. The comment I made was misleading. I do not agree with this pseudo-philosophycal rants people have againts science and as soon as they throw word-salads like this I just tell them that I cant argue with such an stupid point.

>What the fuck does the guy on right is doing on the 2nd panel?

Masturbating his air guitar.