Darwin's bachelor's was in Theology at Christ's College

No one said they are mutually exclusive. No one said humans aren't hypocrites either.

Probably means he realized the flaws of his schooling during those studies.

It could be that his studies in theology (which he during the studies realized were wrong) provoked him to develop his ideas of natural selection.

>Actually, Darwin wasn't even a real scientist, he just drew pictures and made stuff up on a boat, but the darwinists don't want to hear that.

Exactly. He released his paper like 20 years earlier than Mendel's. He just thought of a theory he found interesting.

...

This was normal to study during his time period. His research would've probably led to his demise if he didn't say he believed in a God.

boi u did it

I know, right? Reminds me of something I discovered recently related to evolution: The main story people want us to believe is that 4-6 million years ago, humans didn't exist, and that we had a common ancestor with a chimpanzee. They say that this "wan't a chimp" but that it also "wasn't a human." So that means it would have to have features of both. The problem is, chimpanzees don't have features of both, and humans don't have features of both. If humans and chimps don't have features of both, then how could the common ancestor have features of both? That means either humans evoluved from chimps, or chimps evolved from humans. Obviously since humans are more advanced than chimps, the humans must have "evolved" from chimps. However, if chimps evolted into humans, then how are there still chimps? According to evolution, birds evolved from dinosaurs, therefore there are no dinosaurs left. If humans evolved from chimps, then IT MAKES NOT SENSE FOR THERE TO BE ANY CHIMPS

nice bait.

in future, dont waste so many words on a bait,

This has to beg the question, why do so many scientists believe in evolution? Even though many scientists do NOT believe in it, there is still a significant percent that does. If you think about it, the darwinists have the same evidence as us, but we can come to different conclusions because we don't have the bias of darwinism. Darwinism is the biased assumption that Richard Darwin had all the correct ideas about life science, based on the fact that he was a leading scientist of the time (the 19th century). Actually, Darwin wasn't even a real scientist, he just drew pictures and made stuff up on a boat, but the darwinists don't want to hear that. The bias of darwinism makes many people deluded into thinking that the evidence always points in favor of THEIR view, even though to an unbiased person that would not be the case. But the delusional/biased people aren't the only ones that make up believers in evolution. Since evolutionists have a monopoly on the media and on education, they are able to brainwash (for lack of a better word) aspiring students. That is how some people can continue to be deluded. However, science teachers also dismiss any evidence against evolution a priori, and even refuse to discuss it at all. Many students end up thinking that the only evidence out there is evidence IN FAVOR of evolution, and they're just ignorant of the facts that go against the mainstream theory.

But how long is "a bit"

>Richard Darwin

Definitely bait...

Nice try. Youre trying way too hard though dude.

It's a stale pasta

whats that?

oh it's stale huh? what makes you say that bro

you never been carp fishing? stale spaghetti is often considered the best.... bait.

wont let me post the link but true story.

...