What are the odds Link plays out like Eth and takes a good 18 months after launch to see a break out?

What are the odds Link plays out like Eth and takes a good 18 months after launch to see a break out?

Attached: CC79E0F1-E142-484D-AC6E-083B27A29ADE.png (320x208, 13K)

Other urls found in this thread:

github.com/smartcontractkit/devnet/commit/5dbc7c369fc2115b62fc00f55e99a894ebfb2421
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

They have partners lined up. Blockchain has matured since Ethereum launched.
People will buy link to run nodes, companies will buy link to pay said nodes.
If launch is successful singularity will follow shortly.

Even if you think Link is a meme and garbage, it's garbage that will make you money regardless of absolutely anything else that happens to crypto.

Unironically hold forever.

Attached: 1520038804599.png (1000x800, 48K)

best investor of all time here.
link will breakput in 2 weeks.
screenshot this for maximum gains

100% and a lot of people will sell Vitalikque early

Dubs confirm

Attached: 1516934577525.jpg (2209x2921, 3.17M)

LINK is intrinsically worthless. Node operators can be paid in existing cryptocurrencies. Just look at the testnet right now, it only accepts ETH instead of LINK lmao. It means that ETH can easily be substituted for it, that is, if someone wants to fork the token to accept ETH (an established cryptocurrency instead of some fucking ERC20 token made with a two-man team), LINK is basically useless. That is besides the fact that everything LINK aims to do can be easily done by cryptographically signing the data from the API source.
>muh next ETH

Link, 5 months in: 35 cents (3.5x ICO)
Ethereum, 5 months in: $5.50 (17x ICO)

Uh oh, pissed stinker incoming HAHA.

Attached: 3.jpg (970x980, 222K)

Attached: 1516243457922.jpg (400x711, 205K)

You’re a MANIAC

Attached: 3288A181-E2B5-47DA-B845-C5CE2CDE044A.gif (177x210, 2.12M)

github.com/smartcontractkit/devnet/commit/5dbc7c369fc2115b62fc00f55e99a894ebfb2421

Just check this

What does that mean?

Moving it to ropsten

Just read rhe comment on top, it says : prepare for mainnet

>why is chainlink needed if centralized data providers can never be de-centralized

Attached: 1518263114235.png (640x640, 1.05M)

1,000 years from now Sergey will be hailed not only as the savior of the west, but of the entire world.

Attached: 1521057452220.jpg (800x600, 69K)

Running linknodes on the testnet is going to be a millennial soyboy's wet dream. You will get to feel like an early adopter in the next industrial revolution without really having to be able to program.
Labo BTFO

Let us pray
>Our Father who art in heaven
>Sergey be thy name
>Thy stinkies come
>Thy link become
>1k EOY

>Give us today our daily thread
>And forgive the weak hands
>As we forgive those who dump bags on us

>And lead us not unto JUSTing
>But deliver us from Jewery
>For thine is the link, the stink, and the big mac forever
>Amen

Amen brother

Attached: papa.png (375x472, 241K)

There is a possibility. Mainnet will roll out but I think there will be some time until it really blows up due to mainstream smart contract adoption.

>>why is chainlink needed if centralized data providers can never be de-centralized
>can never be
Not yet.

Chainlink can aggregate data from multiple sources into a single input. Yes, that's still not true decentralization but it's as good as it gets right now.
But we already know this. Chainlink is the bridge between blockchain and traditional systems. In a couple of decades when blockchains are mainstream and when most of the data is on the blockchain, we will have decentralized data providers. This is currently the most safest way to deploy self-executed smart contracts based on real life data.

LINK is intrinsically worthless. Node operators can be paid in existing cryptocurrencies. Just look at the testnet right now, it only accepts ETH instead of LINK lmao. It means that ETH can easily be substituted for it, that is, if someone wants to fork the token to accept ETH (an established cryptocurrency instead of some fucking ERC20 token made with a two-man team), LINK is basically useless. That is besides the fact that everything LINK aims to do can be easily done by cryptographically signing the data from the API source.
>muh next ETH

Link, 5 months in: 35 cents (3.5x ICO)
Ethereum, 5 months in: $5.50 (17x ICO)

Uh oh, pissed stinker incoming HAHA............

Attached: 5.jpg (970x980, 222K)

LET'S GO BOYS
1K EOY

Attached: 1505105419072.jpg (1000x1000, 532K)

This just doesn't make any sense.

Suppose we want to make a derivative based on the stock price of apple. For this to be compromised, the actual price at exchanges would need to be compromised. It's not happening.

Stop worshipping Sergey as Jesus this is sacrilege you are breaking the First Commandment. Pray to God to bless this man and his Big Macs or something will go horribly wrong thank you.